Does participation in ethics discussions have an impact on ethics decision-making? A cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals in paediatric oncology.


Journal

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society
ISSN: 1532-2122
Titre abrégé: Eur J Oncol Nurs
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 100885136

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 26 06 2020
revised: 24 02 2021
accepted: 14 03 2021
pubmed: 17 4 2021
medline: 3 8 2021
entrez: 16 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The overall aim of this study was to describe perceptions of the decision-making process in relation to participation/non-participation in ethics discussions among healthcare professionals in paediatric oncology. Healthcare professionals, working at three paediatric units where ethics discussions where performed answered a study-specific questionnaire focusing on perceptions of involvement, influence, responsibility and understanding of ethics decision-making. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, non-parametric paired t-tests and correlation tests. Participation in ethics discussions was related to perceptions of greater involvement and the possibility of influencing decisions, as well as formal/shared responsibility for the ethics decisions related to patient care. Medical doctors and registered nurses perception of involvement in decisions, possibility to influence and responsibility decreased when they were not present during the ethics discussion or when no ethics discussion was conducted at all. Healthcare professionals had a generally good understanding of the ethical issues and the ethics decisions. The whole group considered medical doctors to be the most important participants in the ethics discussions, followed by patients/family. Healthcare professionals wanted more teamwork and viewed ethics discussions as very helpful for teamwork when dealing with ethical issues in paediatric oncology. Ethics discussions in paediatric oncology practice increases the involvement within and the understanding of the decision-making process about ethical decisions. The understanding is not always dependent on participation, indicating a great trust in team members. Based on these findings the implementation of a structure for ethics support in paediatric oncology where patients/families are integrated is recommended.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33862416
pii: S1462-3889(21)00056-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101950
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101950

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Cecilia Bartholdson (C)

Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's & Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Paediatric Neurology and Musculokeletal Disorders and Homecare, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: cecilia.bartholdson@ki.se.

Margareta Af Sandeberg (MA)

Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's & Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Bert Molewijk (B)

Dep. Ethics, Law & Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Norway.

Pernilla Pergert (P)

Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's & Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH