A randomized controlled trial of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging system on duration of surgery and mental workload for laparoscopic gastropexies in dogs.
Journal
Veterinary surgery : VS
ISSN: 1532-950X
Titre abrégé: Vet Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8113214
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
revised:
01
03
2021
received:
25
08
2020
accepted:
04
04
2021
pubmed:
18
4
2021
medline:
14
7
2021
entrez:
17
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the effect of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy compared to two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy when evaluating duration of surgery for canine intracorporeally sutured gastropexy. Randomized controlled clinical trial. Thirty client-owned dogs. Dogs were randomized into 2D or 3D groups and underwent a three-port laparoscopic intracorporeally sutured incisional gastropexy with barbed suture. Procedures were performed by a single board-certified surgeon. Duration of surgery was recorded and workload was assessed immediately after surgery using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX). Median duration of surgery was 3 min shorter for 3D versus 2D (95%CI -10 to 13; p = .51). Surgical component durations, total and component TLX scores, and intraoperative complications also did not differ between groups. In a subgroup analysis excluding the first eight cases due to presumption of a learning curve with suturing technique, total TLX score (p = .004) and all component scores were lower for 3D as compared to 2D laparoscopy, although duration of surgery did not differ (p = .20). The use of 3D laparoscopy was not associated with shorter duration of surgery when compared to 2D laparoscopy. 3D laparoscopy requires further investigation in veterinary medicine to determine its utility in decreasing surgical duration, surgical complications or surgeon mental or physical workload.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
944-953Subventions
Organisme : UC Davis Center for Companion Animal Health
ID : 2018-26-F
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Références
Healy MA, Regenbogen SE, Kanters AE, et al. Surgeon variation in complications with minimally invasive and open colectomy: results from the Michigan surgical quality collaborative. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(9):860-867.
Scott DJ, Dunnington GL. The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(2):213-221.
Fergo C, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Kildebro N, Rosenberg J. Three-dimensional laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional laparoscopy with high-definition technology for abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2017;213(1):159-170.
Dodwell PC, Engel GR. A theory of binocular fusion. Nature. 1963;198(4875):39-40.
Schwab K, Smith R, Brown V, Whyte M, Jourdan I. Evolution of stereoscopic imaging in surgery and recent advances. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9(8):368-377.
Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, et al. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22(9):865-870.
Ozsoy M, Kallidonis P, Kyriazis I, et al. Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy? Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(4):1325-1333.
Sinha R, Sundaram M, Raje S, Rao G, Sinha M, Sinha R. 3D laparoscopy: technique and initial experience in 451 cases. Gynecol Surg. 2013;10(2):123-128.
Curro G, La Malfa G, Caizzone A, Rampulla V, Navarra G. Three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a single-surgeon prospective randomized comparative study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(11):2120-2124.
Komaei I, Navarra G, Curro G. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(8):790-794.
Koppatz H, Harju J, Siren J, Mentula P, Scheinin T, Sallinen V. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3725-3731.
Majeed AW, Jacob G, Reed MW, Johnson AG. Laparoscopist's thumb: an occupational hazard. Archiv Surg (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 1993;128(3):357.
Zhang J-Y, Liu S-L, Feng Q-M, Gao J-Q, Zhang Q. Correlative evaluation of mental and physical workload of laparoscopic surgeons based on surface electromyography and eye-tracking signals. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11095.
Klein MI, Warm JS, Riley MA, et al. Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces. J Endourol. 2012;26(8):1089-1094.
Ellison EC, Pawlik TM, Way DP, Satiani B, Williams TE. Ten-year reassessment of the shortage of general surgeons: increases in graduation numbers of general surgery residents are insufficient to meet the future demand for general surgeons. Surgery. 2018;164(4):726-732.
Donna B. B. A Cross-Sectional Study on Resilience to Burnout in Veterinary Surgeons in the United Kingdom. [master's thesis]. Leicester, United Kingdom: University of Leicester; 2019.
Dawson BFY, Thompson NJ. The effect of personality on occupational stress in veterinary surgeons. J Vet Med Educ. 2017;44(1):72-83.
Yurko YY, Scerbo MW, Prabhu AS, Acker CE, Stefanidis D. Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(5):267-271.
Mayhew PD, Brown DC. Prospective evaluation of two intracorporeally sutured prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy techniques compared with laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs. Vet Surg. 2009;38(6):738-746.
Spah CE, Elkins AD, Wehrenberg A, et al. Evaluation of two novel self-anchoring barbed sutures in a prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy compared with intracorporeal tied knots. Vet Surg. 2013;42(8):932-942.
Regier PJ, Smeak DD, McGilvray KC. Security and biomechanical strength of three end-pass configurations for the terminal end of intradermal closures performed with unidirectional barbed suture material in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2016;77(12):1392-1400.
Rosenthal R, Hoffmann H, Clavien PA, Bucher HC, Dell-Kuster S. Definition and classification of intraoperative complications (CLASSIC): Delphi study and pilot evaluation. World J Surg. 2015;39(7):1663-1671.
Follette CM, Giuffrida MA, Balsa IM, et al. A systematic review of criteria used to report complications in soft tissue and oncologic surgical clinical research studies in dogs and cats. Vet Surg. 2020;49(1):61-69.
Wacker CA, Weber UT, Tanno F, Lang J. Ultrasonographic evaluation of adhesions induced by incisional gastropexy in 16 dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 1998;39(8):379-384.
Takacs JD, Singh A, Case JB, et al. Total laparoscopic gastropexy using 1 simple continuous barbed suture line in 63 dogs. Vet Surg. 2017;46(2):233-241.
Runge JJ, Boston RC, Ross SB, Brown DC. Evaluation of the learning curve for a board-certified veterinary surgeon performing laparoendoscopic single-site ovariectomy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014;245(7):828-835.
Nguyen DH, Nguyen BH, van Nong H, Tran TH. Three-dimensional laparoscopy in urology: initial experience after 100 cases. Asian J Surg. 2019;42(1):303-306.
Rawlings CA, Foutz TL, Mahaffey MB, Howerth EW, Bement S, Canalis C. A rapid and strong laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62(6):871-875.
Hardie RJ, Flanders JA, Schmidt P, Credille KM, Pedrick TP, Short CE. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of a laparoscopic stapled gastropexy technique in dogs. Vet Surg. 1996;25(2):127-133.
Steelman-Szymeczek SM, Stebbins ME, Hardie EM. Clinical evaluation of a right-sided prophylactic gastropexy via a grid approach. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2003;39(4):397-402.
Benitez ME, Schmiedt CW, Radlinsky MG, Cornell KK. Efficacy of incisional gastropexy for prevention of GDV in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2013;49(3):185-189.
Schulman A, Lusk R, Lippincott C, Ettinger S. Muscular flap gastropexy: a new surgical technique to prevent recurrences of gastric dilatation-volvulus syndrome. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1986;22(3):339-346.
Fransson B. The future: taking veterinary laparoscopy to the next level. J Feline Med Surg. 2014;16(1):42-50.
Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D. Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(3):306-313.
Esposito C, el Ghoneimi A, Yamataka A, et al. Work-related upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in paediatric laparoscopic surgery. A multicenter survey. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(8):1750-1756.
Janhofer DE, Lakhiani C, Song DH. Addressing surgeon fatigue: current understanding and strategies for mitigation. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2019;144(4):693e-699e.
Liu J, Cui F, Li J, et al. Development and clinical applications of glasses-free three-dimensional (3D) display technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(11):214-214.