3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ radiotherapy
Contrast Media
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Female
Gingiva
/ radiation effects
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
/ radiation effects
Middle Aged
Mucositis
/ etiology
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Quality of Life
Radiation Injuries
Radiation Oncology
Radiotherapy
/ instrumentation
Risk
Salivary Gland Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Tooth
/ anatomy & histology
Treatment Outcome
Xerostomia
/ etiology
Young Adult
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Particle therapy
Radiation-induced oral mucositis
Salivary gland tumor
Squamous cell carcinoma
Toxicity
Xerostomia
Journal
Radiation oncology (London, England)
ISSN: 1748-717X
Titre abrégé: Radiat Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Apr 2021
17 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
05
01
2021
accepted:
07
04
2021
entrez:
18
4
2021
pubmed:
19
4
2021
medline:
21
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite modern treatment techniques, radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) may be associated with high rates of acute and late treatment-related toxicity. The most effective approach to reduce sequelae after RT is to avoid as best as possible healthy tissues and organs at risk from the radiation target volume. Even small geometric changes can lead to a significant dose reduction in normal tissue and better treatment tolerability. The major objective of the current study is to investigate 3D printed, tooth-borne tissue retraction devices (TRDs) compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck RT. In the current two-arm randomized controlled phase II trial, a maximum of 34 patients with HNC will be enrolled. Patients will receive either TRDs or conventional dental splints (randomization ratio 1:1) for the RT. The definition of the target volume, modality, total dose, fractionation, and imaging guidance is not study-specific. The primary endpoint of the study is the rate of acute radiation-induced oral mucositis after RT. The quality of life, local control and overall survival 12 months after RT are the secondary endpoints. Also, patient-reported outcomes and dental status, as well as RT plan comparisons and robustness analyzes, will be assessed as exploratory endpoints. Finally, mesenchymal stem cells, derived from the patients' gingiva, will be tested in vitro for regenerative and radioprotective properties. The preliminary clinical application of TRD showed a high potential for reducing acute and late toxicity of RT in patients with HNC. The current randomized study is the first to prospectively investigate the clinical tolerability and efficacy of TRDs for radiation treatment of head and neck tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04454697; July 1
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite modern treatment techniques, radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) may be associated with high rates of acute and late treatment-related toxicity. The most effective approach to reduce sequelae after RT is to avoid as best as possible healthy tissues and organs at risk from the radiation target volume. Even small geometric changes can lead to a significant dose reduction in normal tissue and better treatment tolerability. The major objective of the current study is to investigate 3D printed, tooth-borne tissue retraction devices (TRDs) compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck RT.
METHODS
METHODS
In the current two-arm randomized controlled phase II trial, a maximum of 34 patients with HNC will be enrolled. Patients will receive either TRDs or conventional dental splints (randomization ratio 1:1) for the RT. The definition of the target volume, modality, total dose, fractionation, and imaging guidance is not study-specific. The primary endpoint of the study is the rate of acute radiation-induced oral mucositis after RT. The quality of life, local control and overall survival 12 months after RT are the secondary endpoints. Also, patient-reported outcomes and dental status, as well as RT plan comparisons and robustness analyzes, will be assessed as exploratory endpoints. Finally, mesenchymal stem cells, derived from the patients' gingiva, will be tested in vitro for regenerative and radioprotective properties.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The preliminary clinical application of TRD showed a high potential for reducing acute and late toxicity of RT in patients with HNC. The current randomized study is the first to prospectively investigate the clinical tolerability and efficacy of TRDs for radiation treatment of head and neck tumors.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04454697; July 1
Identifiants
pubmed: 33865401
doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01803-8
pii: 10.1186/s13014-021-01803-8
pmc: PMC8052727
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04454697']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
75Références
Head Neck. 2009 Nov;31(11):1528-30
pubmed: 19283842
Radiother Oncol. 2019 May;134:1-9
pubmed: 31005201
Radiother Oncol. 2010 Oct;97(1):127-31
pubmed: 20541272
Cancer Lett. 2015 Oct 1;366(2):133-40
pubmed: 26166559
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):21-8
pubmed: 19897418
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):219-42
pubmed: 17621469
Oral Dis. 2008 Jan;14(1):40-4
pubmed: 18173447
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):576-580
pubmed: 30598305
Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Jul/Aug;31(4):338-341
pubmed: 29953563
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Jan;64(1):104-108
pubmed: 31104945
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul;78(7):1214.e1-1214.e8
pubmed: 32165135
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Aug 25;4(1):15-19
pubmed: 30706004
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar - Apr;8(2):e27-e31
pubmed: 29291964
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 6;350(19):1945-52
pubmed: 15128894
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):1110-20
pubmed: 17398022
Acta Oncol. 1994;33(8):879-85
pubmed: 7818919
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Jan;130:25-31
pubmed: 30005953
Cancer. 2014 Dec 15;120(24):3994-4002
pubmed: 25143048
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S3-9
pubmed: 20171515
Front Oncol. 2017 May 22;7:89
pubmed: 28589080
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):127-36
pubmed: 21236730
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S10-9
pubmed: 20171502
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:67-73
pubmed: 27249687
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jan;126(1):3-24
pubmed: 29180076
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 6;350(19):1937-44
pubmed: 15128893
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jul 15;11(14):5121-7
pubmed: 16033826
Neoplasia. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):423-31
pubmed: 15548350