Survey of musculoskeletal disorders among US ophthalmologists.
Journal
Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO
ISSN: 1542-8958
Titre abrégé: Digit J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9605355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
entrez:
19
4
2021
pubmed:
20
4
2021
medline:
20
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To characterize the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), symptoms, and risk factors among ophthalmologists. An online survey was distributed to ophthalmologist members of the Maryland Society of Eye Physicians and Surgeons. The survey consisted of 34 questions on respondent demographics, practice characteristics, pain, and effects of MSD on their practice patterns. Participants were excluded if they were not ophthalmologists or if they had MSD symptoms prior to the start of their ophthalmology career. Demographics and practice patterns were compared for those with or without MSD symptoms using the Welch t test and the Fisher exact test. The survey was completed by 127 of 250 active members (response rate, 51%). Of the 127, 85 (66%) reported experiencing work-related pain, with an average pain level of 4/10. With regard to mean age, height, weight, years in practice, number of patients seen weekly, and hours worked weekly, there was no difference between respondents reporting pain and those without. Those reporting MSD symptoms spent significantly more time in surgery than those who did not (mean of 7.9 vs 5.3 hours/week [ A majority of respondents experienced work-related MSD symptoms, which was associated with time spent in surgery. Modifications to the workplace environment focusing on ergonomics, particularly in the operating room, may benefit ophthalmologists.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33867881
doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2020.02.001
pii: djo-19-100
pmc: PMC8031955
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
36-45Informations de copyright
Copyright ©2020. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without expressed written permission of the Digital Journal of Ophthalmology is prohibited.
Références
Ophthalmology. 2012 Feb;119(2):211-2
pubmed: 22305308
MedGenMed. 2004 Dec 13;6(4):1
pubmed: 15775828
Work. 2010;35(4):419-29
pubmed: 20448321
Ophthalmology. 2012 Feb;119(2):213-20
pubmed: 21925736
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan-Feb;27(1):28-32
pubmed: 20859236
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;65(8):678-682
pubmed: 28820152
Int J Surg. 2010;8(2):118-20
pubmed: 19944192
J Surg Res. 2014 Jun 15;189(2):207-212.e6
pubmed: 24721601
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;111(1):52-8
pubmed: 23794645
Can J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;54(3):314-322
pubmed: 31109470
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Feb;88(2):317-26
pubmed: 21187801
Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;52(3):302-307
pubmed: 28576213
J Community Health. 2015 Aug;40(4):670-9
pubmed: 25663369
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1051-5
pubmed: 24232047
Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;35(6):769-75
pubmed: 25609503
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0175737
pubmed: 28441403
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):179-81
pubmed: 15652844
Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Dec;65(9):753-7
pubmed: 26416844