Feature tracking myocardial strain analysis in patients with bileaflet mitral valve prolapse: relationship with LGE and arrhythmias.
Cardiac arrhythmias
Magnetic resonance imaging cine
Mitral valve prolapse
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
01
08
2020
accepted:
12
03
2021
revised:
06
03
2021
pubmed:
20
4
2021
medline:
23
9
2021
entrez:
19
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anatomical substrate and mechanical trigger co-act in arrhythmia's onset in patients with bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (bMVP). Feature tracking (FT) may improve risk stratification provided by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim was to investigate differences in CMR and FT parameters in bMVP patients with and without complex arrhythmias (cVA and no-cVA). In this retrospective study, 52 patients with bMVP underwent 1.5 T CMR and were classified either as no-cVA (n = 32; 12 males; 49.6 ± 17.4 years) or cVA (n = 20; 3 males; 44.7 ± 11.2 years), the latter group including 6 patients (1 male; 45.7 ± 12.7 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (SVT-FV). Twenty-four healthy volunteers (11 males, 36.2 ± 12.5 years) served as control. Curling, prolapse distance, mitral annulus disjunction (MAD), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were recorded and CMR-FT analysis performed. Statistical analysis included non-parametric tests and binary logistic regression. LGE and MAD distance were associated with cVA with an odds ratio (OR) of 8.51 for LGE (95% CI 1.76, 41.28; p = 0.008) and of 1.25 for MAD (95% CI 1.02, 1.54; p = 0.03). GLS 2D (- 11.65 ± 6.58 vs - 16.55 ± 5.09 1/s; p = 0.04), PSSR longitudinal 2D (0.04 ± 1.62 1/s vs - 1.06 ± 0.35 1/s; p = 0.0001), and PSSR radial 3D (3.95 ± 1.97 1/s vs 2.64 ± 1.03 1/s; p = 0.0001) were different for SVT-VF versus the others. PDSR circumferential 2D (1.10 ± 0.54 vs. 0.84 ± 0.34 1/s; p = 0.04) and 3D (0.94 ± 0.42 vs. 0.69 ± 0.17 1/s; p = 0.04) differed between patients with and without papillary muscle LGE. CMR-FT allowed identifying subtle myocardial deformation abnormalities in bMVP patients at risk of SVT-VF. LGE and MAD distance were associated with cVA. • CMR-FT allows identifying several subtle myocardial deformation abnormalities in bMVP patients, especially those involving the papillary muscle. • CMR-FT allows identifying subtle myocardial deformation abnormalities in bMVP patients at risk of SVT and VF. • In patients with bMVP, the stronger predictor of cVA is LGE (OR = 8.51; 95% CI 1.76, 41.28; p = 0.008), followed by MAD distance (OR = 1.25; 95% CI 1.02, 1.54; p = 0.03).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33870458
doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07876-z
pii: 10.1007/s00330-021-07876-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Gadolinium
AU0V1LM3JT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7273-7282Informations de copyright
© 2021. European Society of Radiology.
Références
Hayek E, Gring CN, Griffin BP (2005) Mitral valve prolapse. Lancet 365:507–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17869-6
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17869-6
pubmed: 15705461
Delling FN, Vasan RS (2014) Epidemiology and pathophysiology of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 129:2158–2170. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006702
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006702
pubmed: 24867995
pmcid: 4052751
Jeresaty RM (1986) Mitral valve prolapse: definition and implications in athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80286-8
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80286-8
pubmed: 3510235
Basso C, Iliceto S, Thiene G, Perazzolo Marra M (2019) Mitral valve prolapse, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death. Circulation 140:952–964. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034075
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034075
pubmed: 31498700
Barlow JB, Pocock WA (1963) The significance of late systolic murmurs and mid-late systolic clicks. Md State Med J 12:76–77
pubmed: 13966713
Sriram CS, Syed FF, Ferguson ME et al (2013) Malignant bileaflet mitral valve prolapse syndrome in patients with otherwise idiopathic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.060
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.060
pubmed: 23563135
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. Circulation 129:2440–2492. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029
pubmed: 24589852
Basso C, Perazzolo Marra M, Rizzo S et al (2015) Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse and sudden cardiac death. Circulation 132:556–566. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016291
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016291
pubmed: 26160859
Dejgaard LA, Skjølsvik ET, Lie ØH et al (2018) The mitral annulus disjunction arrhythmic syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 72:1600–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.070
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.070
pubmed: 30261961
Pradella S, Grazzini G, Brandani M et al (2019) Cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with mitral valve prolapse: focus on late gadolinium enhancement and T1 mapping. Eur Radiol 29:1546–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5634-5
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5634-5
pubmed: 30088066
Bui AH, Roujol S, Foppa M et al (2017) Diffuse myocardial fibrosis in patients with mitral valve prolapse and ventricular arrhythmia. Heart 103:204–209. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309303
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309303
pubmed: 27515954
Chitiboi T, Axel L (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial strain: a review of current approaches. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:1263–1280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25718
doi: 10.1002/jmri.25718
pubmed: 28471530
Ermakov S, Gulhar R, Lim L et al (2019) Left ventricular mechanical dispersion predicts arrhythmic risk in mitral valve prolapse. Heart 105:1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314269
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314269
pubmed: 30755467
Han Y, Peters DC, Salton CJ et al (2008) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of mitral valve prolapse. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.01.013
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.01.013
pubmed: 19356441
Gatti M, Palmisano A, Faletti R et al (2019) Two-dimensional and three-dimensional cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking myocardial strain analysis in acute myocarditis patients with preserved ejection fraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 35:1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01588-8
doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01588-8
pubmed: 30929101
Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD et al (2013) Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:91. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-91
doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-91
pubmed: 24103764
pmcid: 3851953
Nacif MS, Barranhas AD, Türkbey E et al (2012) Left atrial volume quantification using cardiac MRI in atrial fibrillation: comparison of the Simpson’s method with biplane area-length, ellipse, and three-dimensional methods. Diagn Interv Radiol. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2012.002
Perazzolo Marra M, Basso C, De Lazzari M et al (2016) Morphofunctional abnormalities of mitral annulus and arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005030
Gilbert BW, Schatz RA, VonRamm OT et al (1976) Mitral valve prolapse. Two-dimensional echocardiographic and angiographic correlation. Circulation 54:716–723. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.54.5.716
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.54.5.716
pubmed: 975465
Eriksson MJ, Bitkover CY, Omran AS et al (2005) Mitral annular disjunction in advanced myxomatous mitral valve disease: echocardiographic detection and surgical correction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2005.06.013
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.06.013
pubmed: 16198877
Kitkungvan D, Nabi F, Kim RJ et al (2018) Myocardial fibrosis in patients with primary mitral regurgitation with and without prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol 72:823–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.048
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.048
pubmed: 30115220
Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542
doi: 10.1161/hc0402.102975
Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2013) Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-35
doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-35
pubmed: 23634753
pmcid: 3695769
Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2020) Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6
doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6
pubmed: 32160925
pmcid: 7066763
Di Leo G, Sardanelli F (2020) Statistical significance: p value, 0.05 threshold, and applications to radiomics—reasons for a conservative approach. Eur Radiol Exp 4:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-0145-y
doi: 10.1186/s41747-020-0145-y
pubmed: 32157489
pmcid: 7064671
Bennett S, Thamman R, Griffiths T et al (2019) Mitral annular disjunction: a systematic review of the literature. Echocardiography 36:1549–1558. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14437
doi: 10.1111/echo.14437
pubmed: 31385360
Slavich M, Palmisano A, Pannone L et al (2019) Hidden danger behind the prolapse. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 12. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009639
Kalam K, Otahal P, Marwick TH (2014) Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction. Heart 100:1673–1680. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305538
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305538
pubmed: 24860005
Huttin O, Pierre S, Venner C et al (2016) Interactions between mitral valve and left ventricle analysed by 2D speckle tracking in patients with mitral valve prolapse: one more piece to the puzzle. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew075
Wang J, Khoury DS, Thohan V et al (2007) Global diastolic strain rate for the assessment of left ventricular relaxation and filling pressures. Circulation 115:1376–1383. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.662882
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.662882
pubmed: 17339549
Ruivo C, Vilela EM, Ladeiras-Lopes R et al (2019) Myocardial deformation measures by cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking in myocarditis: relationship with systolic function and myocardial damage. Rev Port Cardiol 38:767–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2019.01.008
doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2019.01.008
pubmed: 31982265
Kempny A, Fernández-Jiménez R, Orwat S et al (2012) Quantification of biventricular myocardial function using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking, endocardial border delineation and echocardiographic speckle tracking in patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot and healthy controls. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-32
doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-32
pubmed: 22650308
pmcid: 3464868