A meta-analysis of the activity, stability, and mutational characteristics of temperature-adapted enzymes.


Journal

Bioscience reports
ISSN: 1573-4935
Titre abrégé: Biosci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8102797

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 04 2021
Historique:
received: 04 02 2021
revised: 29 03 2021
accepted: 19 04 2021
pubmed: 20 4 2021
medline: 24 12 2021
entrez: 19 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Understanding the characteristics that define temperature-adapted enzymes has been a major goal of extremophile enzymology in recent decades. In the present study, we explore these characteristics by comparing psychrophilic, mesophilic, and thermophilic enzymes. Through a meta-analysis of existing data, we show that psychrophilic enzymes exhibit a significantly larger gap (Tg) between their optimum and melting temperatures compared with mesophilic and thermophilic enzymes. These results suggest that Tg may be a useful indicator as to whether an enzyme is psychrophilic or not and that models of psychrophilic enzyme catalysis need to account for this gap. Additionally, by using predictive protein stability software, HoTMuSiC and PoPMuSiC, we show that the deleterious nature of amino acid substitutions to protein stability increases from psychrophiles to thermophiles. How this ultimately affects the mutational tolerance and evolutionary rate of temperature adapted organisms is currently unknown.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33871022
pii: 228416
doi: 10.1042/BSR20210336
pmc: PMC8150157
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s).

Références

Protein Eng. 2001 Mar;14(3):141-8
pubmed: 11342709
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 17;92(2):452-6
pubmed: 7831309
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 18;6:23257
pubmed: 26988870
Nat Commun. 2020 May 26;11(1):2644
pubmed: 32457471
BMC Genomics. 2009 Jan 08;10:11
pubmed: 19133128
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001 Mar;65(1):1-43
pubmed: 11238984
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Nov 13;374(2080):
pubmed: 27698032
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000520
pubmed: 19543367
Biophys J. 2009 Feb 18;96(4):1586-96
pubmed: 19217874
Extremophiles. 2008 Jan;12(1):51-9
pubmed: 17849082
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 15;95(19):11476-81
pubmed: 9736762
Biochemistry. 1996 Feb 27;35(8):2597-609
pubmed: 8611563
PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Jun 23;2(6):e69
pubmed: 16789817
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2001;36(1):39-106
pubmed: 11256505
Structure. 2000 May 15;8(5):493-504
pubmed: 10801491
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 9;104(41):16152-7
pubmed: 17913881
J Mol Biol. 1992 Jun 5;225(3):585-9
pubmed: 1602471
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2016 Jun;38:37-43
pubmed: 27288744
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Sep;63(9):3577-84
pubmed: 9293009
J Biol Chem. 2003 Mar 7;278(10):7891-6
pubmed: 12511577
J Biol Chem. 2014 Mar 14;289(11):7994-8006
pubmed: 24448805
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2017 Feb;42:117-128
pubmed: 28040640
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Oct 3;374(4):725-30
pubmed: 18667161
Nature. 2008 Feb 7;451(7179):704-7
pubmed: 18256669
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003 Dec;1(3):200-8
pubmed: 15035024
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7709):324-328
pubmed: 29875414
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Aug;59(8):2614-21
pubmed: 16349019
J Bacteriol. 2005 Sep;187(17):6197-205
pubmed: 16109961
J Biol Chem. 2004 Jul 2;279(27):28202-8
pubmed: 15100224
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51761
pubmed: 23284762
Biochemistry. 2016 Mar 29;55(12):1681-8
pubmed: 26881922
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 21;9(1):1177
pubmed: 29563521
J Mol Biol. 2002 Aug 9;321(2):285-96
pubmed: 12144785
Protein Eng. 2000 Mar;13(3):179-91
pubmed: 10775659
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019 Sep 1;366(18):
pubmed: 31626298
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11;103(15):5869-74
pubmed: 16581913
Protein Sci. 2007 Sep;16(9):1887-95
pubmed: 17766385
Scientifica (Cairo). 2013;2013:512840
pubmed: 24278781
Amino Acids. 2008 Jan;34(1):25-33
pubmed: 17710363
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0131495
pubmed: 26177372
ACS Chem Biol. 2013 Nov 15;8(11):2388-93
pubmed: 24015933
J Mol Biol. 2007 Sep 7;372(1):130-49
pubmed: 17632124
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 May 13;12:151
pubmed: 21569468
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 4;10(1):1822
pubmed: 32020026
Sci Rep. 2014 Aug 27;4:6205
pubmed: 25158668

Auteurs

Stewart Gault (S)

UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, U.K.

Peter M Higgins (PM)

UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, U.K.
Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, U.K.

Charles S Cockell (CS)

UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, U.K.

Kaitlyn Gillies (K)

UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, U.K.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages

Exploring blood-brain barrier passage using atomic weighted vector and machine learning.

Yoan Martínez-López, Paulina Phoobane, Yanaima Jauriga et al.
1.00
Blood-Brain Barrier Machine Learning Humans Support Vector Machine Software
Cephalometry Humans Anatomic Landmarks Software Internet
Humans Algorithms Software Artificial Intelligence Computer Simulation

Classifications MeSH