Image Quality Assessment for Clinical Cadmium Telluride-Based Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Detector in Cadaveric Wrist Imaging.
Journal
Investigative radiology
ISSN: 1536-0210
Titre abrégé: Invest Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0045377
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2021
01 12 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
22
4
2021
medline:
15
4
2022
entrez:
21
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Detailed visualization of bone microarchitecture is essential for assessment of wrist fractures in computed tomography (CT). This study aims to evaluate the imaging performance of a CT system with clinical cadmium telluride-based photon-counting detector (PCD-CT) compared with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner with energy-integrating detector technology (EID-CT). Both CT systems were used for the examination of 8 cadaveric wrists with radiation dose equivalent scan protocols (low-/standard-/full-dose imaging: CTDIvol = 1.50/5.80/8.67 mGy). All wrists were scanned with 2 different operating modes of the photon-counting CT (standard-resolution and ultra-high-resolution). After reformatting with comparable reconstruction parameters and convolution kernels, subjective evaluation of image quality was performed by 3 radiologists on a 7-point scale. For estimation of interrater reliability, we report the intraclass correlation coefficient (absolute agreement, 2-way random-effects model). Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated to provide semiquantitative assessment of image quality. Subjective image quality of standard-dose PCD-CT examinations in ultra-high-resolution mode was superior compared with full-dose PCD-CT in standard-resolution mode (P = 0.016) and full-dose EID-CT (P = 0.040). No difference was ascertained between low-dose PCD-CT in ultra-high-resolution mode and standard-dose scans with either PCD-CT in standard-resolution mode (P = 0.108) or EID-CT (P = 0.470). Observer evaluation of standard-resolution PCD-CT and EID-CT delivered similar results in full- and standard-dose scans (P = 0.248/0.509). Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.876 (95% confidence interval, 0.744-0.925; P < 0.001), indicating good reliability. Between dose equivalent studies, signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were substantially higher in photon-counting CT examinations (all P's < 0.001). Superior visualization of fine anatomy is feasible with the clinical photon-counting CT system in cadaveric wrist scans. The ultra-high-resolution scan mode suggests potential for considerable dose reduction over energy-integrating dual-source CT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33882030
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000789
pii: 00004424-202112000-00001
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cadmium Compounds
0
Tellurium
NQA0O090ZJ
cadmium telluride
STG188WO13
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
785-790Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: J.P.G. was financially supported by the Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research Würzburg (grant number Z-2/CSP-06). J.P.G. and B.P. received speaker honoraria from Siemens Healthcare GmbH. M.P. and T.A. are employees of Siemens Healthcare GmbH. For the remaining authors, no conflicts of interest were declared. The Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology of the University Hospital Würzburg receives research funding from Siemens Healthcare GmbH outside of the submitted work.
Références
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury . 2006;37:691–697.
Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin . 2012;28:113–125.
Torabi M, Lenchik L, Beaman FD, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute hand and wrist trauma. J Am Coll Radiol . 2019;16:S7–S17.
Grunz JP, Pennig L, Fieber T, et al. Twin robotic x-ray system in small bone and joint trauma: impact of cone-beam computed tomography on treatment decisions. Eur Radiol . 2020.
Müller FC, Gosvig KK, Børgesen H, et al. Dual-energy CT for suspected radiographically negative wrist fractures: a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study. Radiology . 2020;296:596–602.
Zhou W, Lane JI, Carlson ML, et al. Comparison of a photon-counting-detector CT with an energy-integrating-detector CT for temporal bone imaging: a cadaveric study. Am J Neuroradiol . 2018;39:1733–1738.
Flohr T, Petersilka M, Henning A, et al. Photon-counting CT review. Phys Med . 2020;79:126–136.
McCollough CH, Boedeker K, Cody D, et al. Principles and applications of multienergy CT: Report of AAPM Task Group 291. Med Phys . 2020;47:e881–e912.
Wildberger JE, Prokop M. Hounsfield's Legacy. Invest Radiol . 2020;55:556–558.
Willemink MJ, Persson M, Pourmorteza A, et al. Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology . 2018;289:293–312.
Von Spiczak J, Mannil M, Peters B, et al. Photon counting computed tomography with dedicated sharp convolution kernels: tapping the potential of a new technology for stent imaging. Invest Radiol . 2018;53:486–494.
Sartoretti T, Eberhard M, Rüschoff JH, et al. Photon-counting CT with tungsten as contrast medium: experimental evidence of vessel lumen and plaque visualization. Atherosclerosis . 2020;310:11–16.
Klein L, Dorn S, Amato C, et al. Effects of detector sampling on noise reduction in clinical photon-counting whole-body computed tomography. Invest Radiol . 2020;55:111–119.
Huber FA, Becce F, Gkoumas S, et al. Differentiation of crystals associated with arthropathies by spectral photon-counting radiography: a proof-of-concept study. Invest Radiol . 2021;56:147–152.
Rajendran K, Voss BA, Zhou W, et al. Dose reduction for sinus and temporal bone imaging using photon-counting detector CT with an additional tin filter. Invest Radiol . 2020;55:91–100.
Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V, et al. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. Am J Roentgenol . 2014;203:123–130.
Alkadhi H, Euler A. The future of computed tomography: personalized, functional, and precise. Invest Radiol . 2020;55:545–555.
Symons R, Reich DS, Bagheri M, et al. Photon-counting computed tomography for vascular imaging of the head and neck: first in vivo human results. Invest Radiol . 2018;53:135–142.
Yel I, Booz C, Albrecht MH, et al. Optimization of image quality and radiation dose using different cone-beam CT exposure parameters. Eur J Radiol . 2019;116:68–75.
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med . 2016;15:155–163.
Leng S, Yu Z, Halaweish A, et al. Dose-efficient ultrahigh-resolution scan mode using a photon counting detector computed tomography system. J Med Imaging . 2016;3:043504.
Gutjahr R, Halaweish AF, Yu Z, et al. Human imaging with photon counting-based computed tomography at clinical dose levels: contrast-to-noise ratio and cadaver studies. Invest Radiol . 2016;51:421–429.
Bornefalk H, Danielsson M. Photon-counting spectral computed tomography using silicon strip detectors: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol . 2010;55:1999–2022.
Flohr T, Ulzheimer S, Petersilka M, et al. Basic principles and clinical potential of photon-counting detector CT. Chin J Acad Radiol . 2020;3:19–34.
Leng S, Rajendran K, Gong H, et al. 150-μm spatial resolution using photon-counting detector computed tomography technology: technical performance and first patient images. Invest Radiol . 2018;53:655–662.
Pourmorteza A, Symons R, Henning A, et al. Dose efficiency of quarter-millimeter photon-counting computed tomography: first-in-human results. Invest Radiol . 2018;53:365–372.
Fonseca AA, Cherubini K, Veeck EB, et al. Effect of 10% formalin on radiographic optical density of bone specimens. Dentomaxillofac Radiol . 2008;37:137–141.