Auditory cues facilitate object movement processing in human extrastriate visual cortex during simulated self-motion: A pilot study.
Adult
Auditory Cortex
/ physiology
Auditory Perception
/ physiology
Cues
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Magnetoencephalography
/ methods
Male
Motion
Motion Perception
/ physiology
Movement
/ physiology
Optic Flow
/ physiology
Photic Stimulation
/ methods
Pilot Projects
Visual Cortex
/ physiology
Visual Perception
/ physiology
Young Adult
Auditory
Crossmodal
Magnetoencephalography
Motion processing
Multisensory
Object motion
Optic flow
Self-motion
Visual
Journal
Brain research
ISSN: 1872-6240
Titre abrégé: Brain Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0045503
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 08 2021
15 08 2021
Historique:
received:
04
09
2020
revised:
12
04
2021
accepted:
13
04
2021
pubmed:
22
4
2021
medline:
22
1
2022
entrez:
21
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Visual segregation of moving objects is a considerable computational challenge when the observer moves through space. Recent psychophysical studies suggest that directionally congruent, moving auditory cues can substantially improve parsing object motion in such settings, but the exact brain mechanisms and visual processing stages that mediate these effects are still incompletely known. Here, we utilized multivariate pattern analyses (MVPA) of MRI-informed magnetoencephalography (MEG) source estimates to examine how crossmodal auditory cues facilitate motion detection during the observer's self-motion. During MEG recordings, participants identified a target object that moved either forward or backward within a visual scene that included nine identically textured objects simulating forward observer translation. Auditory motion cues 1) improved the behavioral accuracy of target localization, 2) significantly modulated the MEG source activity in the areas V2 and human middle temporal complex (hMT+), and 3) increased the accuracy at which the target movement direction could be decoded from hMT+ activity using MVPA. The increase of decoding accuracy by auditory cues in hMT+ was significant also when superior temporal activations in or near auditory cortices were regressed out from the hMT+ source activity to control for source estimation biases caused by point spread. Taken together, these results suggest that parsing object motion from self-motion-induced optic flow in the human extrastriate visual cortex can be facilitated by crossmodal influences from auditory system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33882297
pii: S0006-8993(21)00346-2
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147489
pmc: PMC8206020
mid: NIHMS1698637
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
147489Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : P41 EB015896
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC016765
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC016915
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC017991
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Oct;24(8):2389-405
pubmed: 17042793
J Vis. 2010 Apr 22;10(4):9.1-16
pubmed: 20465329
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Apr;30(2):330-45
pubmed: 15053692
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 22;278(1719):2840-7
pubmed: 21307050
Nature. 1988 Mar 10;332(6160):154-5
pubmed: 3347252
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 3;36(31):8093-102
pubmed: 27488630
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 21;4:70
pubmed: 23439729
Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Jan;224(1):111-131
pubmed: 30288557
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Aug;221(2):177-89
pubmed: 22811215
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 1;55(3):1208-18
pubmed: 21195781
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Mar;47(4):1045-52
pubmed: 19041883
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 26;99(24):15755-7
pubmed: 12429855
J Neurosci. 2013 May 15;33(20):8841-9
pubmed: 23678126
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(13):1847-62
pubmed: 14527547
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jul;20(7):1529-38
pubmed: 19875677
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:446-60
pubmed: 24161808
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Dec;25(3):650-8
pubmed: 16298112
J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 4;29(44):13809-14
pubmed: 19889992
J Comp Neurol. 2007 Jun 20;502(6):894-923
pubmed: 17447261
Science. 1987 Jul 24;237(4813):400-2
pubmed: 3603025
Hear Res. 2014 Jan;307:86-97
pubmed: 23886698
Multisens Res. 2018 Jan 1;31(3-4):251-272
pubmed: 31264625
Perception. 1972;1(4):371-94
pubmed: 4377168
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Jan;27(1):1-13
pubmed: 16082624
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:31-41
pubmed: 28082107
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Mar;83:161-169
pubmed: 26275965
Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):279-85
pubmed: 16443376
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 12;28(11):2690-7
pubmed: 18337398
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 3;109(27):11019-24
pubmed: 22699495
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Mar;41(4):1084-1111
pubmed: 31713304
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 14;38(7):1737-1743
pubmed: 29229707
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1053-65
pubmed: 18823194
J Vis. 2012 Mar 12;12(3):
pubmed: 22410584
J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 15;30(37):12329-39
pubmed: 20844129
Neuroimage. 1999 Jul;10(1):1-5
pubmed: 10385576
Percept Psychophys. 1981 Jun;29(6):578-84
pubmed: 7279586
Neuroimage. 2020 Mar;208:116436
pubmed: 31809885
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Mar;83:170-178
pubmed: 26072092
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 27;8(1):3742
pubmed: 29487374
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 06;9(10):e107715
pubmed: 25285560
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80
pubmed: 16530430
Nature. 1986 Mar 20-26;320(6059):264-5
pubmed: 3960106
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998 Aug;8(4):494-502
pubmed: 9751663
Multisens Res. 2019;32(1):45-65
pubmed: 30613468
Iperception. 2017 May 18;8(3):2041669517708206
pubmed: 28567272
Curr Biol. 2020 Jun 22;30(12):2289-2299.e8
pubmed: 32442465
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90
pubmed: 17517438
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Apr;19(2):185-94
pubmed: 15019714
J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;22(13):5749-59
pubmed: 12097528
Percept Mot Skills. 1973 Dec;37(3):967-79
pubmed: 4764534
Nature. 2000 Oct 19;407(6806):906-8
pubmed: 11057669
Brain Res. 1971 Aug 7;31(1):85-105
pubmed: 4998922
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):358-69
pubmed: 16075294
Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 15;65:13-22
pubmed: 23032489
Brain Res. 1971 Dec 24;35(2):528-32
pubmed: 5002708
Prog Neurobiol. 2020 Dec;195:101824
pubmed: 32446882
Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1431-56
pubmed: 21324335
Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 29;19(18):1555-60
pubmed: 19699091
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Sep;237(9):2137-2143
pubmed: 31201472
Brain Res. 2012 Jul 23;1466:99-111
pubmed: 22617375
Neuroreport. 2001 Aug 8;12(11):2557-60
pubmed: 11496148
J Neurophysiol. 1991 Jun;65(6):1329-45
pubmed: 1875243
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Feb 23;20(3):327-339
pubmed: 28230841
Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 26;15(14):R542-3
pubmed: 16051158
Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Oct;50(1-2):19-26
pubmed: 14511833
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Sep;11(5):473-90
pubmed: 10511637
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):255-66
pubmed: 18354398
Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(5):655-63
pubmed: 18243274
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e63198
pubmed: 23646195
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 May;31(10):1772-82
pubmed: 20584181
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1989 Feb;36(2):165-71
pubmed: 2917762
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Mar;24(3):575-87
pubmed: 22126670