Psychiatric readmission rates in a multi-level mental health care system - a descriptive population cohort study.
Multi-level mental health care system
Psychiatry
Readmission
Survival analysis
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Apr 2021
23 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
16
10
2020
accepted:
14
04
2021
entrez:
24
4
2021
pubmed:
25
4
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Readmission rates are frequently used as a quality indicator for health care, yet their validity for evaluating quality is unclear. Published research on variables affecting readmission to psychiatric hospitals have been inconsistent. The Norwegian specialist mental health care system is characterized by a multi-level structure; hospitals providing specialized -largely unplanned care and district psychiatric centers (DPCs) providing generalized -more often planned care. In certain service systems, readmission may be an integral part of individual patients' treatment plan. The aim of the present study was to describe and examine the task division in a multi-level health care system. This we did through describing differences in patient population (age, sex, diagnosis, substance abuse comorbidity and length of stay) and admissions types (unplanned vs. planned) treated at different levels (hospital, DPC or both), and by examining whether readmission risk differ according to type and place of treatment of index-admission and travel-time to nearest hospital and DPC. In this population-based cohort study using administrative data we included all individuals aged 18 and older who were discharged from psychiatric inpatient care with an ICD-10 diagnosis F2-F6 ("functional mental disorders") in 2012. Selecting each individual's first discharge during 2012 as index gave N = 16,185 for analyses following exclusions. Analysis of readmission risk were done using Kaplan-Maier failure curves. Overall, 15.1 and 47.7% of patients were readmitted within 30 and 365 days, respectively. Unplanned admission patients were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days than planned patients. Those transferred between hospital and DPC during index admission were more likely to be readmitted within 365 days, and to experience planned readmission. Patients with short travel time were more likely to have unplanned readmission, while patients with long travel time were more likely to have planned readmission. DPCs and hospitals fill different purposes in the Norwegian health care system, which is reflected in different patient populations. Differences in short term readmission rates between hospitals and DPCs disappeared when type of admission (unplanned/planned) was considered. The results stress the importance of addressing differences in organisation and task distribution when comparing readmission rates between mental health systems.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Readmission rates are frequently used as a quality indicator for health care, yet their validity for evaluating quality is unclear. Published research on variables affecting readmission to psychiatric hospitals have been inconsistent. The Norwegian specialist mental health care system is characterized by a multi-level structure; hospitals providing specialized -largely unplanned care and district psychiatric centers (DPCs) providing generalized -more often planned care. In certain service systems, readmission may be an integral part of individual patients' treatment plan. The aim of the present study was to describe and examine the task division in a multi-level health care system. This we did through describing differences in patient population (age, sex, diagnosis, substance abuse comorbidity and length of stay) and admissions types (unplanned vs. planned) treated at different levels (hospital, DPC or both), and by examining whether readmission risk differ according to type and place of treatment of index-admission and travel-time to nearest hospital and DPC.
METHODS
METHODS
In this population-based cohort study using administrative data we included all individuals aged 18 and older who were discharged from psychiatric inpatient care with an ICD-10 diagnosis F2-F6 ("functional mental disorders") in 2012. Selecting each individual's first discharge during 2012 as index gave N = 16,185 for analyses following exclusions. Analysis of readmission risk were done using Kaplan-Maier failure curves.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 15.1 and 47.7% of patients were readmitted within 30 and 365 days, respectively. Unplanned admission patients were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days than planned patients. Those transferred between hospital and DPC during index admission were more likely to be readmitted within 365 days, and to experience planned readmission. Patients with short travel time were more likely to have unplanned readmission, while patients with long travel time were more likely to have planned readmission.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
DPCs and hospitals fill different purposes in the Norwegian health care system, which is reflected in different patient populations. Differences in short term readmission rates between hospitals and DPCs disappeared when type of admission (unplanned/planned) was considered. The results stress the importance of addressing differences in organisation and task distribution when comparing readmission rates between mental health systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33892715
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06391-7
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06391-7
pmc: PMC8067649
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
378Subventions
Organisme : Seventh Framework Programme
ID : 603264
Références
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 7;16(1):376
pubmed: 27821155
J Ment Health. 2020 Oct;29(5):532-540
pubmed: 29701489
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):2
pubmed: 28049441
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;46(9):881-91
pubmed: 20577712
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2002 Feb;16(1):16-24
pubmed: 11877602
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 24;20(1):454
pubmed: 32448201
Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;30(2):258-70
pubmed: 25278422
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;44(7):550-7
pubmed: 19096743
World Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;15(1):13-20
pubmed: 26833597
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 24;17(1):227
pubmed: 28646857
Health Policy. 2019 Nov;123(11):1028-1035
pubmed: 31405616
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;70(8):633-40
pubmed: 27348629
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Apr;25(2):181-93
pubmed: 25703270
Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):135-55
pubmed: 15663706
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;52(11):1405-1413
pubmed: 28849245
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Aug 03;5:2050312117724311
pubmed: 28839939
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2010 Mar 31;4:5
pubmed: 20356355
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;53(2):139-149
pubmed: 29124290
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015 Jul 23;17(4):
pubmed: 26693047
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2018 Jul-Sep;40(3):193-201
pubmed: 30304116
N Z Med J. 2009 Feb 13;122(1289):63-70
pubmed: 19305451
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 May;47(5):487-96
pubmed: 8740489
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Oct 30;209(3):691-8
pubmed: 23528520
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(2):361-76
pubmed: 15110426
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Sep;18 Suppl 1:31-8
pubmed: 16954514
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2009 Dec 25;3(1):28
pubmed: 20035623
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:205-13
pubmed: 25537450
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr;34(2):137-50
pubmed: 17437186
Nord J Psychiatry. 2002;56(1):23-8
pubmed: 11869461
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):81
pubmed: 29402266
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 10;14:64
pubmed: 24506810
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999 Sep;100(3):212-9
pubmed: 10493088
Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Jul;51(7):885-9
pubmed: 10875952
Health Policy. 2018 Apr;122(4):359-366
pubmed: 29277424
Int J Integr Care. 2011 Oct;11:e142
pubmed: 22359521
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;63(6):404-409
pubmed: 29409334