Hemodynamic clinical phenotyping in septic shock.


Journal

Current opinion in critical care
ISSN: 1531-7072
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Crit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9504454

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 06 2021
Historique:
entrez: 26 4 2021
pubmed: 27 4 2021
medline: 21 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recent studies have failed to show significant benefit from a uniform strategy, suggesting that hemodynamic management must be individually adapted in septic shock depending on different phenotypes. Different approaches that may be used to this end will be discussed. Fluid management is a cornerstone of resuscitation, as the positive fluid balance has been associated with higher mortality and right ventricular failure. Myocardial evaluation is mandatory, as sepsis patients may present with a hyperkinetic state, left ventricular (systolic and diastolic) and/or right ventricular dysfunction, the latter being associated with higher mortality. Statistical approaches with the identification of hemodynamic clusters based on echocardiographic and clinical parameters might be integrated into daily practice to develop precision medicine. Such approaches may also predict the progression of septic shock. Different hemodynamic phenotypes can occur at any stage of sepsis and be associated with one another. The clinician must regularly assess dynamic changes in phenotypes in septic shock patients. Statistical approaches based on machine learning need to be validated by prospective studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33899819
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000834
pii: 00075198-202106000-00013
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

290-297

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315:801–810.
Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020; 395:200–211.
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Eng J Med 2001; 345:1368–1377.
Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Eng J Med 2014; 371:1496–1506.
Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Eng J Med 2014; 370:1683–1693.
Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock. JAMA 2016; 315:762–774.
Hess ML, Hastillo A, Greenfield LJ. Spectrum of cardiovascular function during gram-negative sepsis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1981; 23:279–298.
Vieillard-Baron A, Prin S, Chergui K, et al. Hemodynamic instability in sepsis: bedside assessment by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168:1270–1276.
Greyson CR. Pathophysiology of right ventricular failure. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: (Suppl): S57–S65.
Messmer AS, Zingg C, Müller M, et al. Fluid overload and mortality in adult critical care patients – a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:1862–1870.
Bentzer P, Griesdale DE, Boyd J, et al. Will this hemodynamically unstable patient respond to a bolus of intravenous fluids? JAMA 2016; 316:1298–1309.
Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care 2016; 6:111doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7
Bégot E, Repessé X, Prat G, et al. Evaluation comparative des indices échocardiographiques de précharge-dépendance chez les patients en défaillance circulatoire: étude prospective multicentrique HEMOPRED. Anesth Réanim 2015; 1: (Suppl): A139–A140.
Vieillard-Baron A, Evrard B, Repessé X, et al. Limited value of end-expiratory inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness, impact of intra-abdominal pressure. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:197–203.
Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul JL, et al. Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:1529–1537.
Schumer W. Physiopathology and treatment of septic shock. Am J Energ Med 1984; 2:74–77.
Edul VSK, Ince C, Vazquez AR, et al. Similar microcirculatory alteration in patients with normodynamic and hyperdynamic septic shock. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016; 13:240–247.
Chauvet JL, El-Dash S, Delastre O, et al. Early dynamic left ventricular obstruction is associated with hypovolemia and high mortality in septic shock patients. Crit Care 2015; 19:262.
Baumgartner JD, Vaney C, Perret C. An extreme form of the hyperdynamic syndrome in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 1984; 10:245–249.
Vieillard-Baron A, Schmitt JM, Beauchet A, et al. Early preload adaptation in septic shock? A transesophageal echocardiographic study. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:400–406.
Jardin F, Fourme T, Page B, et al. Persistent preload defect in severe sepsis despite fluid loading. Chest 1999; 116:1354–1359.
Poelaert J, Declerck C, Vogelaers D, et al. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23:553–560.
Kakihana Y, Ito T, Nakahara M, et al. Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction: pathophysiology and management. J Intensive Care 2016; 4:22doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0148-1.
doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0148-1
Huang SJ, Nalos M, McLean AS. Is early ventricular dysfunction or dilation associated with lower mortality rate in adult severe sepsis and septic shock? A meta-analysis. Crit Care 2013; 17:R96.
Berrios RAS, O’Horo JC, Velagapudi V, Pulido JN. Correlation of left ventricular systolic dysfunction determined by low ejection fraction and 30-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care 2014; 29:495–499.
Landesberg G, Gilon D, Meroz Y, et al. Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock. Eur Heart J 2012; 33:895–903.
Mawri S, Alsafadi MY, Jain T, et al. Diastolic dysfunction in septic shock: insights from echocardiography. Chest 2016; 150:335A.
Kimchi A, Ellrodt AG, Berman DS, et al. Right ventricular performance in septic shock: a combined radionuclide and hemodynamic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4:945–951.
Lanspa MJ, Cirulis MM, Wiley BM, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction in early sepsis and septic shock. Chest 2020; 159:1055–1063.
Kim J, Kim Y, Kim M, et al. Association between right ventricle dysfunction and poor outcome in patients with septic shock. Heart 2020; 106:1665–1671.
Vallabhajosyula S, Kumar M, Pandompatam G, et al. Prognostic impact of isolated right ventricular dysfunction in sepsis and septic shock: an 8-year historical cohort study. Ann Intensive Care 2017; 7:94doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0319-9.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0319-9
Harjola VP, Mebazaa A, Čelutkienė J, et al. Contemporary management of acute right ventricular failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Association and the Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18:226–241.
Lahm T, Douglas IS, Archer SL, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function in the research setting: knowledge gaps and pathways forward. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 198:e15–e43.
Vieillard-Baron A, Prigent A, Repessé X, et al. Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness. Critical Care 2020; 24:630doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03345-z.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03345-z
Sanchez-Pinto LN, Luo Y, Churpek MM. Big data and data science in critical care. Chest 2018; 154:1239–1248.
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2016; 43:304–377.
Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:925–928.
Gordon AC, Perkins GD, Singer M, et al. Levosimendan for the prevention of acute organ dysfunction in sepsis. New Engl J Med 2016; 375:1638–1648.
Geri G, Vignon P, Aubry A, et al. Cardiovascular clusters in septic shock combining clinical and echocardiographic parameters: a posthoc analysis. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:657–667.
Husson F, Josse J, Pagès J. Principal component methods—hierarchical clustering—partitional clustering: why would be need to choose for visualizing data? Technical report 2010; 1–17.
Forte JC, Perner A, Van der Horst ICC. The use of clustering algorithms in critical care research to unravel patient heterogeneity. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:1025–1028.
Liu R, Greenstein JL, Granite SJ, et al. Data-driven discovery of a novel sepsis preshock state predicts impending septic shock in the ICU. Nature 2019; 9:6145.
Knox DB, Lanspa MJ, Kuttler KG, et al. Phenotypic clusters within sepsis-associated multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:814–822.
Seymour CW, Kennedy JN, Wang S, et al. Derivation, validation, and potential treatment implications of novel clinical phenotypes for sepsis. JAMA 2019; 321:2003–2017.

Auteurs

Anousone Daulasim (A)

Medical Intensive Care Unit, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, INSERM UMR 1018, Clinical Epidemiology Team, CESP, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH