Lymph node positivity and association with long-term survival for different histologies of appendiceal cancer.


Journal

Journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1096-9098
Titre abrégé: J Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0222643

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 24 02 2021
accepted: 02 04 2021
pubmed: 27 4 2021
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 26 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Appendiceal cancers represent a diverse group of malignancies with varying biological behavior. The significance of lymph node metastases in relation to long-term survival and chemotherapy response is poorly defined. The National Cancer Database was queried to find patients diagnosed with appendiceal cancer from 1998 to 2012. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to study the association between lymph node status and overall survival. Stage IV patients were excluded. The rate of nodal positivity of the 9841 patients with known node status was: signet ring 47.4%, carcinoid 42.3%, nonmucinous adenocarcinoma 28.8%, goblet cell 21.9%, and mucinous adenocarcinoma 20.4%. Node-positive patients had worse long-term survival for all subtypes with the exception of carcinoid tumors (p < 0.001). The strongest association was for signet cell and goblet cell. Adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive patients improved survival for mucinous, nonmucinous, and signet ring cell histology (p < 0.01), but not for goblet cell. Nodal involvement in patients with appendiceal cancer varies in incidence, association with adverse survival, and response to systemic therapy. Individualized treatment algorithms for the management of the subtypes of appendiceal cancer are needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Appendiceal cancers represent a diverse group of malignancies with varying biological behavior. The significance of lymph node metastases in relation to long-term survival and chemotherapy response is poorly defined.
METHODS METHODS
The National Cancer Database was queried to find patients diagnosed with appendiceal cancer from 1998 to 2012. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to study the association between lymph node status and overall survival. Stage IV patients were excluded.
RESULTS RESULTS
The rate of nodal positivity of the 9841 patients with known node status was: signet ring 47.4%, carcinoid 42.3%, nonmucinous adenocarcinoma 28.8%, goblet cell 21.9%, and mucinous adenocarcinoma 20.4%. Node-positive patients had worse long-term survival for all subtypes with the exception of carcinoid tumors (p < 0.001). The strongest association was for signet cell and goblet cell. Adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive patients improved survival for mucinous, nonmucinous, and signet ring cell histology (p < 0.01), but not for goblet cell.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Nodal involvement in patients with appendiceal cancer varies in incidence, association with adverse survival, and response to systemic therapy. Individualized treatment algorithms for the management of the subtypes of appendiceal cancer are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33902156
doi: 10.1002/jso.26493
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

88-96

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Marmor S, Portschy PR, Tuttle TM, Virnig BA. The rise in appendiceal cancer incidence: 2000-2009. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(4):743-750.
Norman J. Carr TDC, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, et al. A consensus for classification and pathologic reporting of pseudomyxoma peritonei and associated appendiceal neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:14-26.
Percy C, Holten V, Van M, Calum S. World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990.
McGory ML, Maggard MA, Kang H, O'Connell JB, Ko CY. Malignancies of the appendix: beyond case series reports. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(12):2264-2271.
Asare EA, Compton CC, Hanna NN, et al. The impact of stage, grade, and mucinous histology on the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the appendix: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2016;122(2):213-221.
Widmann B, Warschkow R, Schmied BM, Marti L, Steffen T. Impact of mucinous histology on the prognosis of stage I-III adenocarcinomas of the appendix: a population-based, propensity score-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(8):1493-1502.
Turaga KK, Pappas SG, Gamblin T. Importance of histologic subtype in the staging of appendiceal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(5):1379-1385.
McCusker ME, Cote TR, Clegg LX, Sobin LH. Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: a population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973-1998. Cancer. 2002;94(12):3307-3312.
Mullen JT, Savarese DM. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104(1):41-44.
Trivedi AN, Levine EA, Mishra G. Adenocarcinoma of the appendix is rarely detected by colonoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(4):668-675.
Weiser MR. AJCC 8th edition: colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(6):1454-1455.
National Cancer Database. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/ncdb. Accessed November 2019.
Celina S-P, Ang JPS, Hardy-Abeloos CJ, et al. Millis, Olivier Harismendy. Genomic Landscape of Appendiceal Neoplasms. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2:1-18.
Legue LM, Creemers GJ, De Hingh I, Lemmens V, Huysentruyt CJ. Review: pathology and its clinical relevance of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019;18(1):1-7.
Kelly KJ. Management of appendix cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2015;28(4):247-255.
Nussbaum DP, Speicher PJ, Gulack BC, et al. Management of 1- to 2-cm carcinoid tumors of the appendix: using the National Cancer Data Base to address controversies in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(5):894-903.
Groth SS, Virnig BA, Al-Refaie WB, Jarosek SL, Jensen EH, Tuttle TM. Appendiceal carcinoid tumors: predictors of lymph node metastasis and the impact of right hemicolectomy on survival. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103(1):39-45.
Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas. 2013;42(4):557-577.
Tang LH, Shia J, Soslow RA, et al. Pathologic classification and clinical behavior of the spectrum of goblet cell carcinoid tumors of the appendix. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(10):1429-1443.

Auteurs

Christopher Webb (C)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.

Yu-Hui Chang (YH)

Department of Surgery, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Surgical Outcomes Program, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.

Barbara A Pockaj (BA)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.

Richard J Gray (RJ)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.

Chee-Chee Stucky (CC)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.

Nabil Wasif (N)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH