Natural History of Post-Treatment Kidney Stone Fragments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
lithotripsy
nephrolithotomy, percutaneous
treatment outcome
ureteroscopy
urolithiasis
Journal
The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
28
4
2021
medline:
31
8
2021
entrez:
27
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We assessed the literature around post-treatment asymptomatic residual stone fragments and performed a meta-analysis. The main outcomes were intervention rate and disease progression. We searched Ovid®, MEDLINE®, Embase™, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov using search terms: "asymptomatic", "nephrolithiasis", "ESWL", "PCNL", "URS" and "intervention." Inclusion criteria were all studies with residual renal fragments following treatment (shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy). Analysis was performed using 'metafor' in R and bias determined using Newcastle-Ottawa scale. From 273 articles, 18 papers (2,096 patients) had details of intervention rate for residual fragments. Aggregate intervention rates for ≤4 mm fragments rose from 19% (20 months) to 22% (50 months), while >4 mm fragments rose from 22% to 47%. Aggregate disease progression rates for ≤4 mm rose from 25% to 47% and >4 mm rose from 26% to 88%. However, there was substantial difference in definition of "disease progression." Meta-analysis comparing >4 mm against ≤4 mm fragments: intervention rate for >4 mm (vs ≤4 mm): OR=1.50 (95% CI 0.70-2.30), p <0.001, I Larger post-treatment residual fragments are significantly more likely to require further intervention especially in the long term. Smaller fragments, although less likely to require further intervention, still carry that risk. Notably, there is no significant difference in disease progression between fragment sizes. Patients with residual fragments should be appropriately counselled and informed decision-making regarding further management should be done.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33904756
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001836
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
526-538Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn