Efficacy of an implementation package on documentation of central venous catheter insertions: an observational study.
critical care
healthcare quality improvement
patient safety
Journal
BMJ open quality
ISSN: 2399-6641
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Qual
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101710381
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
09
08
2020
revised:
05
04
2021
accepted:
19
04
2021
entrez:
29
4
2021
pubmed:
30
4
2021
medline:
30
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proper documentation of central venous catheter (CVC) insertions in electronic healthcare records is the basis for good follow-up and quality assurance. We have noted serious deficiencies in the documentation of CVC insertions and introduced an implementation package with the purpose of increasing the completeness of this documentation. The aim of the present study was to estimate the effect of the implementation package by assessing the proportion of missing data before and after the introduction of the implementation package. In this single centre observational study, data from CVC insertion templates in a common electronic health record were extracted and analysed after introducing the implementation package. The package included adoption of new local CVC-directions, a new updated CVC-insertion template in the regional common electronic health record and a review of all CVC-insertion templates with a reminder to the inserting physician to supplement missing data. The proportion of terms with missing data was reviewed and also compared with the proportion of missing data in a study prior to the introduction of the package. In total, 7126 CVC-insertion templates were included. Of these 5539 (78%) were without missing data for any of the 13 predefined variables. Completed insertion templates for three common terms increased from 38% prior to the introduction of the implementation package to 93%, which represents an absolute reduction for missing data of 55% (95% CI 53% to 56%, p<0.0001). The implementation package was highly effective in increasing the proportion of fully documented CVC insertions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Proper documentation of central venous catheter (CVC) insertions in electronic healthcare records is the basis for good follow-up and quality assurance. We have noted serious deficiencies in the documentation of CVC insertions and introduced an implementation package with the purpose of increasing the completeness of this documentation. The aim of the present study was to estimate the effect of the implementation package by assessing the proportion of missing data before and after the introduction of the implementation package.
METHODS
In this single centre observational study, data from CVC insertion templates in a common electronic health record were extracted and analysed after introducing the implementation package. The package included adoption of new local CVC-directions, a new updated CVC-insertion template in the regional common electronic health record and a review of all CVC-insertion templates with a reminder to the inserting physician to supplement missing data. The proportion of terms with missing data was reviewed and also compared with the proportion of missing data in a study prior to the introduction of the package.
RESULTS
In total, 7126 CVC-insertion templates were included. Of these 5539 (78%) were without missing data for any of the 13 predefined variables. Completed insertion templates for three common terms increased from 38% prior to the introduction of the implementation package to 93%, which represents an absolute reduction for missing data of 55% (95% CI 53% to 56%, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION
The implementation package was highly effective in increasing the proportion of fully documented CVC insertions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33910958
pii: bmjoq-2020-001155
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001155
pmc: PMC8094360
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Feb;26(1):60-4
pubmed: 26136462
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jan;28(1):18-28
pubmed: 11818995
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 19;9(10):e029301
pubmed: 31630102
Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35
pubmed: 18049195
Anaesthesia. 2016 May;71(5):573-85
pubmed: 26888253
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Jan;63(1):61-68
pubmed: 29992634
Anesthesiology. 2020 Jan;132(1):8-43
pubmed: 31821240
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Feb;64(2):224-231
pubmed: 31523802
BMJ. 2015 Sep 04;351:h4672
pubmed: 26341898
J Hosp Med. 2017 Jul;12(7):551-557
pubmed: 28699944
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jan;28(1):1-17
pubmed: 11818994
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Dec;42(12):555-AP11
pubmed: 28334559