Producers of Engineered Nanomaterials-What Motivates Company and Worker Participation in Biomonitoring Programs?
engineered nanomaterials
exposure assessment
human biomonitoring programs
occupational exposure
online survey
participation propensity
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 04 2021
07 04 2021
Historique:
received:
22
02
2021
revised:
02
04
2021
accepted:
03
04
2021
entrez:
30
4
2021
pubmed:
1
5
2021
medline:
25
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Production and handling of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) can yield worker exposure to these materials with the potential for unforeseen negative health effects. Biomonitoring enables regular exposure and health assessment and an effective risk management. We aimed to identify factors influencing biomonitoring acceptance according to hierarchical positions of ENM producers. Managers and workers were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Forty-three companies producing or handling ENMs such as titanium dioxide (61%) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (44%) participated. The majority of managers (72%) and all workers responded positively to participating in biomonitoring studies. The main reasons for refusing participation included concerns about data confidentiality and sufficient knowledge about ENM health and safety. Acquisitions of individual study results, improvement of workers' safety, and help to the development of ENM-specific health and safety practice were among the most valuable reasons for positively considering participation. All workers indicated feeling comfortable with biomonitoring procedures of exhaled air sampling-about half were similarly comfortable with exhaled breath condensate, urine, and buccal cell sampling. The majority of both workers and managers stated that participation in a biomonitoring program should take place during working hours. Although our survey only had limited participation, our results are useful in designing appropriate biomonitoring programs for workers exposed to ENMs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33916897
pii: ijerph18083851
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083851
pmc: PMC8067629
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nanotubes, Carbon
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 Jun;222(5):727-737
pubmed: 31176761
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Oct;60(8):916-35
pubmed: 27422281
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Jan 1;61(1):87-97
pubmed: 28395313
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Oct;220(7):1089-1097
pubmed: 28711303
Nanotoxicology. 2016 Sep;10(7):1013-9
pubmed: 26865347
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 May 1;45(3):217-238
pubmed: 30653633
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Feb;72(2):148-153
pubmed: 29203525
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Jun;12(2):227-37
pubmed: 25672617
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008 Jan;27(1):5-21
pubmed: 18480145
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0166071
pubmed: 27829014
Can J Public Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;101(2):159-64
pubmed: 20524383
Epidemiology. 2016 Sep;27(5):765-8
pubmed: 27054652
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Apr;7(4):224-32
pubmed: 20155559
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002 Mar-Apr;63(2):205-12
pubmed: 11975658
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 07;16(18):
pubmed: 31500229
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Feb;59(1):125-32
pubmed: 20933039
Environ Int. 2018 Jul;116:214-228
pubmed: 29698898
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016 Mar;219(2):166-75
pubmed: 26752069
Toxicol Lett. 2018 Dec 1;298:112-124
pubmed: 29920308