Assessing the suitability of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA genetic markers for molecular systematics and species identification of helminths.
Genetic marker
Helminth
K-means
Molecular identification
Molecular systematics
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2021
01 May 2021
Historique:
received:
13
02
2021
accepted:
21
04
2021
entrez:
2
5
2021
pubmed:
3
5
2021
medline:
8
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Genetic markers are employed widely in molecular studies, and their utility depends on the degree of sequence variation, which dictates the type of application for which they are suited. Consequently, the suitability of a genetic marker for any specific application is complicated by its properties and usage across studies. To provide a yardstick for future users, in this study we assess the suitability of genetic markers for molecular systematics and species identification in helminths and provide an estimate of the cut-off genetic distances per taxonomic level. We assessed four classes of genetic markers, namely nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers, nuclear rRNA, mitochondrial rRNA and mitochondrial protein-coding genes, based on certain properties that are important for species identification and molecular systematics. For molecular identification, these properties are inter-species sequence variation; length of reference sequences; easy alignment of sequences; and easy to design universal primers. For molecular systematics, the properties are: average genetic distance from order/suborder to species level; the number of monophyletic clades at the order/suborder level; length of reference sequences; easy alignment of sequences; easy to design universal primers; and absence of nucleotide substitution saturation. Estimation of the cut-off genetic distances was performed using the 'K-means' clustering algorithm. The nuclear rRNA genes exhibited the lowest sequence variation, whereas the mitochondrial genes exhibited relatively higher variation across the three groups of helminths. Also, the nuclear and mitochondrial rRNA genes were the best possible genetic markers for helminth molecular systematics, whereas the mitochondrial protein-coding and rRNA genes were suitable for molecular identification. We also revealed that a general gauge of genetic distances might not be adequate, using evidence from the wide range of genetic distances among nematodes. This study assessed the suitability of DNA genetic markers for application in molecular systematics and molecular identification of helminths. We provide a novel way of analyzing genetic distances to generate suitable cut-off values for each taxonomic level using the 'K-means' clustering algorithm. The estimated cut-off genetic distance values, together with the summary of the utility and limitations of each class of genetic markers, are useful information that can benefit researchers conducting molecular studies on helminths.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Genetic markers are employed widely in molecular studies, and their utility depends on the degree of sequence variation, which dictates the type of application for which they are suited. Consequently, the suitability of a genetic marker for any specific application is complicated by its properties and usage across studies. To provide a yardstick for future users, in this study we assess the suitability of genetic markers for molecular systematics and species identification in helminths and provide an estimate of the cut-off genetic distances per taxonomic level.
METHODS
METHODS
We assessed four classes of genetic markers, namely nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers, nuclear rRNA, mitochondrial rRNA and mitochondrial protein-coding genes, based on certain properties that are important for species identification and molecular systematics. For molecular identification, these properties are inter-species sequence variation; length of reference sequences; easy alignment of sequences; and easy to design universal primers. For molecular systematics, the properties are: average genetic distance from order/suborder to species level; the number of monophyletic clades at the order/suborder level; length of reference sequences; easy alignment of sequences; easy to design universal primers; and absence of nucleotide substitution saturation. Estimation of the cut-off genetic distances was performed using the 'K-means' clustering algorithm.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The nuclear rRNA genes exhibited the lowest sequence variation, whereas the mitochondrial genes exhibited relatively higher variation across the three groups of helminths. Also, the nuclear and mitochondrial rRNA genes were the best possible genetic markers for helminth molecular systematics, whereas the mitochondrial protein-coding and rRNA genes were suitable for molecular identification. We also revealed that a general gauge of genetic distances might not be adequate, using evidence from the wide range of genetic distances among nematodes.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study assessed the suitability of DNA genetic markers for application in molecular systematics and molecular identification of helminths. We provide a novel way of analyzing genetic distances to generate suitable cut-off values for each taxonomic level using the 'K-means' clustering algorithm. The estimated cut-off genetic distance values, together with the summary of the utility and limitations of each class of genetic markers, are useful information that can benefit researchers conducting molecular studies on helminths.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33933158
doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04737-y
pii: 10.1186/s13071-021-04737-y
pmc: PMC8088577
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Mitochondrial
0
Genetic Markers
0
RNA, Ribosomal
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
233Références
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Mar;42(3):622-36
pubmed: 17084644
Parasitol Res. 2019 Jan;118(1):203-217
pubmed: 30552574
Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;3(5):294-9
pubmed: 7881515
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992 Sep;54(2):165-73
pubmed: 1435857
Nature. 1998 Mar 5;392(6671):71-5
pubmed: 9510248
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jul 20;13(1):364
pubmed: 32690073
Syst Parasitol. 2016 Mar;93(3):295-306
pubmed: 26898592
J Helminthol. 2019 May;93(3):260-276
pubmed: 30973318
Int J Parasitol. 1996 Jul;26(7):687-704
pubmed: 8894760
Gene. 2014 Sep 15;548(2):277-84
pubmed: 25042163
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;89(3):185-190
pubmed: 28865743
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9 Suppl s1:75-82
pubmed: 21564967
Parasitol Res. 2012 Oct;111(4):1467-72
pubmed: 22669693
Int J Parasitol. 2002 May;32(5):527-31
pubmed: 11943225
BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):121
pubmed: 31195978
Sci Rep. 2014 Feb 13;4:4089
pubmed: 24522485
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36(2):290-302
pubmed: 25430893
Parasitol Int. 2011 Dec;60(4):521-3
pubmed: 21798366
J Hered. 2017 Jun 1;108(4):431-437
pubmed: 28379490
Mol Ecol. 2018 Oct;27(20):3968-3975
pubmed: 30129071
J Helminthol. 2020 Mar 06;94:e136
pubmed: 32138801
Int J Parasitol. 2007 Oct;37(12):1401-18
pubmed: 17570370
Korean J Parasitol. 1999 Dec;37(4):215-28
pubmed: 10634037
J Parasitol. 2019 Feb;105(1):102-112
pubmed: 30807727
Parasitol Int. 2010 Mar;59(1):35-9
pubmed: 19800982
Parasitol Int. 2012 Mar;61(1):90-3
pubmed: 21740979
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
pubmed: 11524383
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017 Feb;107:404-414
pubmed: 27940331
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jan 9;10(1):17
pubmed: 28069063
Parasitol Res. 2013 Nov;112(11):3933-49
pubmed: 24018707
Vet Parasitol. 2007 Sep 1;148(2):161-5
pubmed: 17614204
Syst Biol. 2006 Aug;55(4):595-609
pubmed: 16967577
Acta Trop. 2000 Dec 1;77(3):243-56
pubmed: 11114386
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9
pubmed: 24132122
Front Zool. 2005 Mar 16;2(1):5
pubmed: 15771783
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Dec;31(12):3125-35
pubmed: 25274273
Int J Parasitol. 2003 Jul;33(7):733-55
pubmed: 12814653
Int J Parasitol. 1999 Dec;29(12):1965-70
pubmed: 10961852
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Oct;45(1):311-25
pubmed: 17485227
Parasitology. 2005 Dec;131(Pt 6):839-46
pubmed: 16336737
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jan 17;13(1):32
pubmed: 31952539
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2002 Aug;Chapter 2:Unit 2.3
pubmed: 18792934
Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19 Suppl 1:4-20
pubmed: 20331766
Bioinformatics. 2013 Nov 15;29(22):2869-76
pubmed: 23990417
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Nov 1;34(11):2762-2772
pubmed: 28981721
Parasitol Res. 2007 Oct;101(5):1251-5
pubmed: 17605007
Parasitol Int. 2008 Jun;57(2):191-7
pubmed: 18276183
Acta Trop. 2020 Nov;211:105645
pubmed: 32702297
Adv Parasitol. 2005;60:101-63
pubmed: 16230103
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Jun;63(3):834-47
pubmed: 22406529
Syst Biol. 2007 Dec;56(6):875-8
pubmed: 18027280
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Sep;23(9):1792-800
pubmed: 16790472
Int J Parasitol. 1998 Dec;28(12):1931-4
pubmed: 9925274
Parasitol Int. 2019 Aug;71:121-125
pubmed: 30980897
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Feb 10;15:13
pubmed: 25887041