Beyond the single average tumor: Understanding IO combinations using a clinical QSP model that incorporates heterogeneity in patient response.
Journal
CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology
ISSN: 2163-8306
Titre abrégé: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101580011
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
revised:
17
03
2021
received:
11
01
2021
accepted:
18
03
2021
pubmed:
4
5
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
3
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A quantitative systems pharmacology model for metastatic melanoma was developed for immuno-oncology with the goal of predicting efficacy of combination checkpoint therapy with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab. This literature-based model is developed at multiple scales: (i) tumor and immune cell interactions at a lesion level; (ii) multiple heterogeneous target lesions, nontarget lesion growth, and appearance of new metastatic lesion at a patient level; and (iii) interpatient differences at a population level. The model was calibrated to pembrolizumab and ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with melanoma from Robert et al., specifically, waterfall plot showing target lesion response and overall response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1), which additionally considers nontarget lesion growth and appearance of new metastatic lesions. We then used the model to predict waterfall and RECIST version 1.1 for combination treatment reported in Long et al. A key insight from this work was that nontarget lesions growth and appearance of new metastatic lesion contributed significantly to disease progression, despite reduction in target lesions. Further, the lesion level simulations of combination therapy show substantial efficacy in warm lesions (intermediary immunogenicity) but limited advantage of combination in both cold and hot lesions (low and high immunogenicity). Because many patients with metastatic disease are expected to have a mixture of these lesions, disease progression in such patients may be driven by a subset of cold lesions that are unresponsive to checkpoint inhibitors. These patients may benefit more from the combinations which include therapies to target cold lesions than double checkpoint inhibitors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33938166
doi: 10.1002/psp4.12637
pmc: PMC8302246
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Ipilimumab
0
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
684-695Subventions
Organisme : Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation & Vantage Research LLC. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;62:138-45
pubmed: 27237360
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016 May;5(5):235-49
pubmed: 27299936
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71
pubmed: 25428505
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;21(19):4286-93
pubmed: 25977344
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Jul 10;14:221
pubmed: 23841912
Front Immunol. 2019 Apr 30;10:924
pubmed: 31134058
J Clin Invest. 2016 Sep 1;126(9):3447-52
pubmed: 27525433
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):134-44
pubmed: 23724846
Ann Biomed Eng. 2008 Feb;36(2):321-34
pubmed: 18046647
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1202-1210
pubmed: 28729151
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1109-17
pubmed: 25034862
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;39(1):98-106
pubmed: 26558876
Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 1;72(5):1070-80
pubmed: 22266112
Am J Dermatopathol. 2003 Aug;25(4):291-9
pubmed: 12876486
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 20;37(36):3546-3555
pubmed: 31675272
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;5(3):140-6
pubmed: 27069777
JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1600-9
pubmed: 27092830
Nature. 2017 May 4;545(7652):60-65
pubmed: 28397821
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;109(3):605-618
pubmed: 32686076
Front Oncol. 2018 Mar 28;8:86
pubmed: 29644214
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2521-32
pubmed: 25891173