Neural substrates of neuropsychological profiles in dystrophynopathies: A pilot study of diffusion tractography imaging.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
24
12
2020
accepted:
06
04
2021
entrez:
3
5
2021
pubmed:
4
5
2021
medline:
8
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cognitive difficulties and neuropsychological alterations in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD, BMD) boys are not yet sufficiently explored, although this topic could have a relevant impact, finding novel biomarkers of disease both at genetics and neuroimaging point of view. The current study aims to: 1) analyze the neuropsychological profile of a group of DMD and BMD boys without cognitive impairment with an assessment of their executive functions; 2) explore the structural connectivity in DMD, BMD, and age-matched controls focusing on cortico-subcortical tracts that connect frontal cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum via the thalamus; 3) explore possible correlations between altered structural connectivity and clinical neuropsychological measures. This pilot study included 15 boys (5 DMD subjects, 5 BMD subjects, and 5 age-matched typically developing, TD). They were assessed using a neuropsychological assessment protocol including cognitive and executive functioning assessment and performed a 1.5T MRI brain exam including advance Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) method for tractography. Structural connectivity measurements were extracted along three specific tracts: Cortico-Ponto-Cerebellar Tract (CPCT), Cerebellar-Thalamic Tract (CTT), and Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF). Cortical-Spinal Tract (CST) was selected for reference, as control tract. Regarding intellectual functioning, a major impairment in executive functions compared to the general intellectual functioning was observed both for DMD (mean score = 86.20; SD = 11.54) and for BMD children (mean score = 88; SD = 3.67). Mean FA resulted tendentially always lower in DMD compared to both BMD and TD groups for all the examined tracts. The differences in FA were statistically significant for the right CTT (DMD vs BMD, p = 0.002, and DMD vs TD, p = 0.0015) and the right CPCT (DMD vs TD, p = 0.008). Concerning DMD, significant correlations emerged between FA-R-CTT and intellectual quotients (FIQ, p = 0.044; ρs = 0.821), and executive functions (Denomination Total, p = 0.044, ρs = 0.821; Inhibition Total, p = 0.019, ρs = 0.900). BMD showed a significant correlation between FA-R-CPCT and working memory index (p = 0.007; ρs = 0.949). In this pilot study, despite the limitation of sample size, the findings support the hypothesis of the involvement of a cerebellar-thalamo-cortical loop for the neuropsychological profile of DMD, as the CTT and the CPCT are involved in the network and the related brain structures are known to be implied in executive functions. Our results suggest that altered WM connectivity and reduced fibre organization in cerebellar tracts, probably due to the lack of dystrophin in the brain, may render less efficient some neuropsychological functions in children affected by dystrophinopathies. The wider multicentric study could help to better establish the role of cerebellar connectivity in neuropsychological profile for dystrophinopathies, identifying possible novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33939732
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250420
pii: PONE-D-20-40464
pmc: PMC8092766
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0250420Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016 Apr;37(3):239-44
pubmed: 26836830
Am J Med Genet. 1998 Oct 30;80(1):32-41
pubmed: 9800909
Metab Brain Dis. 2017 Apr;32(2):307-310
pubmed: 28130616
Neurol Clin. 2014 Aug;32(3):671-88, viii
pubmed: 25037084
Neurology. 2000 Aug 22;55(4):559-64
pubmed: 10953192
Neurosci Lett. 1992 Mar 16;137(1):105-8
pubmed: 1625810
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 May;30(5):1017-21
pubmed: 19386732
Neurology. 2013 Mar 5;80(10):926-32
pubmed: 23390172
Lancet Neurol. 2003 Dec;2(12):731-40
pubmed: 14636778
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 27;9:278
pubmed: 29997534
Psychiatr Hung. 2019;34(3):300-310
pubmed: 31570661
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 May;38(5):2333-2344
pubmed: 28094463
Nature. 1990 Dec 20-27;348(6303):725-8
pubmed: 2259381
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Mar;4(6):109
pubmed: 27127762
Child Neuropsychol. 2013;19(4):350-69
pubmed: 22385039
J Radiol Case Rep. 2012 Aug;6(8):1-7
pubmed: 23365711
Cortex. 2012 Nov-Dec;48(10):1262-87
pubmed: 22995574
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014 Mar;18(2):150-6
pubmed: 24149099
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;28(10):1929-33
pubmed: 17898198
Arch Pediatr. 2015 Dec;22(12 Suppl 1):12S58-62
pubmed: 26773588
Am J Ment Retard. 1989 Mar;93(5):544-7
pubmed: 2706122
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(3):486-96
pubmed: 18022230
Neuromuscul Disord. 2021 Apr;31(4):319-327
pubmed: 33658162
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 20;5(1):e8803
pubmed: 20098710
NMR Biomed. 2011 Apr;24(3):253-62
pubmed: 21404337
Brain Struct Funct. 2014 Jan;219(1):269-81
pubmed: 23288254
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68
pubmed: 23020641
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):917-23
pubmed: 26659337
Front Neurosci. 2018 Feb 06;12:33
pubmed: 29467603
J Child Neurol. 2008 Feb;23(2):155-62
pubmed: 18056690
J Neurol Sci. 1998 Oct 8;160(2):148-57
pubmed: 9849797
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jun;51(7):1361-9
pubmed: 22634247
Brain Lang. 2007 Jul;102(1):1-12
pubmed: 17428527
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102078
pubmed: 31795042
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1560-70
pubmed: 21907811
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jun 04;5:84-92
pubmed: 25003031
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Oct-Nov;45-46:168-77
pubmed: 26255617
Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Oct 15;18(20):3779-94
pubmed: 19602481
Neurology. 2017 Aug 29;89(9):960-969
pubmed: 28768849
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 May;31(5):730-753
pubmed: 30726177
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 10;4(8):e6574
pubmed: 19649270
Brain. 2002 Jan;125(Pt 1):4-13
pubmed: 11834588
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 16;13(1):e0191164
pubmed: 29338029
Neurosci Lett. 1995 Oct 27;199(3):175-8
pubmed: 8577391
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 16;39(42):8362-8375
pubmed: 31444243
Autism Res. 2016 Mar;9(3):382-92
pubmed: 26280255
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998 Jan;40(1):12-20
pubmed: 9459212
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1566-76
pubmed: 21262366
Neuromuscul Disord. 1994 Jul;4(4):359-69
pubmed: 7981593
Ann Neurol. 2014 Sep;76(3):403-11
pubmed: 25043804
J Pers Med. 2020 Dec 12;10(4):
pubmed: 33322765
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Dec;32(11):2196-200
pubmed: 21960496
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):11787-11792
pubmed: 29078281
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 2;39(1):3-14
pubmed: 30389839
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001 Jul;43(7):497-501
pubmed: 11463183
Neuromuscul Disord. 2015 Oct;25(10):764-72
pubmed: 26236031
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Nov;34:92-100
pubmed: 30114552
Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 Feb;28(2):122-128
pubmed: 29305139
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Jun;3(3):484-90
pubmed: 8353425
J Nat Sci. 2017 Nov;3(11):
pubmed: 29104930
Muscle Nerve. 2002 Oct;26(4):506-12
pubmed: 12362416
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 12;13:180
pubmed: 31244625
Dev Rev. 2019 Jun;52:42-62
pubmed: 31417205
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101740
pubmed: 30870736
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;25(8):1359-77
pubmed: 21999586
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;21:101615
pubmed: 30522973
Brain Dev. 2007 Jun;29(5):317-21
pubmed: 17113260
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Oct;32(4):809-17
pubmed: 20882611
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Feb-Mar;115(2-3):271-89
pubmed: 14962404
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573
Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Mar;4(3):329-35
pubmed: 7795584
Neuromuscul Disord. 2017 Jan;27(1):29-37
pubmed: 27927595