Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental health personnel in Norway.
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 May 2021
03 May 2021
Historique:
received:
20
01
2021
accepted:
22
04
2021
entrez:
4
5
2021
pubmed:
5
5
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic put a pressure on all healthcare professionals and has affected the delivery of health care services globally. There is a need to understand the impact on different health care professionals in different countries. The aim of the present study was to explore the psychological impact of the pandemic among dental staff in Norway in relation to background characteristics, work situation and preparedness of the service. A structured questionnaire sent electronically to dentists, dental hygienists and dental assistants inquired information about the lockdown period in Norway (13 March-17 April 2020). Distributions of background characteristics, perceptions of preparedness and psychological impact were calculated. Exploratory factor analysis was performed, and Structural Equation Models (SEMs) were used to compare psychological impact between dental professionals treating patients versus not during lockdown. Among the 1237 respondents, 58.8% worked clinically with patients. The majority were concerned of becoming infected (71.9%), of infecting others (85.4%) and/or of their family becoming infected (76.9%). Respondents who treated patients felt significantly more insecure about whether having become infected or not. The minority felt discriminated (6.7%), worried about death (11.7%), felt that life was threatening (9.8%) or felt loss of control of their lives (8.9%). More than 80% agreed that their workplace handled the situation well. Four factors were retrieved from the factor analysis. SEMs showed that gender and work experience had a significant effect on the factors Instability, Infection and Concerns. Respondents with work experience ≥10 years were less likely to express fear about Instability and Infection. Personnel reporting that their workplace had adequate equipment were also less concerned, however having adequate equipment did not reduce the factor Loss of control. The present study showed a considerable psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental personnel in Norway regardless of working clinically with patients or not. However, working with patients increased the insecurity about own infection status and of infecting people close to them. A safe working environment and adequate infection control measures are associated with less fear of infection and feeling of instability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic put a pressure on all healthcare professionals and has affected the delivery of health care services globally. There is a need to understand the impact on different health care professionals in different countries. The aim of the present study was to explore the psychological impact of the pandemic among dental staff in Norway in relation to background characteristics, work situation and preparedness of the service.
METHODS
METHODS
A structured questionnaire sent electronically to dentists, dental hygienists and dental assistants inquired information about the lockdown period in Norway (13 March-17 April 2020). Distributions of background characteristics, perceptions of preparedness and psychological impact were calculated. Exploratory factor analysis was performed, and Structural Equation Models (SEMs) were used to compare psychological impact between dental professionals treating patients versus not during lockdown.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 1237 respondents, 58.8% worked clinically with patients. The majority were concerned of becoming infected (71.9%), of infecting others (85.4%) and/or of their family becoming infected (76.9%). Respondents who treated patients felt significantly more insecure about whether having become infected or not. The minority felt discriminated (6.7%), worried about death (11.7%), felt that life was threatening (9.8%) or felt loss of control of their lives (8.9%). More than 80% agreed that their workplace handled the situation well. Four factors were retrieved from the factor analysis. SEMs showed that gender and work experience had a significant effect on the factors Instability, Infection and Concerns. Respondents with work experience ≥10 years were less likely to express fear about Instability and Infection. Personnel reporting that their workplace had adequate equipment were also less concerned, however having adequate equipment did not reduce the factor Loss of control.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The present study showed a considerable psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental personnel in Norway regardless of working clinically with patients or not. However, working with patients increased the insecurity about own infection status and of infecting people close to them. A safe working environment and adequate infection control measures are associated with less fear of infection and feeling of instability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33941194
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06443-y
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06443-y
pmc: PMC8092364
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
420Références
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 06;11:564083
pubmed: 33123045
CMAJ. 2003 May 13;168(10):1245-51
pubmed: 12743065
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64
pubmed: 32799105
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:552305
pubmed: 33071872
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113190
pubmed: 32563745
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560
pubmed: 32304649
Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(4):242-250
pubmed: 32272480
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):
pubmed: 32806769
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Dec;76:102307
pubmed: 32937259
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):1230
pubmed: 32787815
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14):
pubmed: 32674416
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 04;11:2166
pubmed: 33013555
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2020 Oct;8:100144
pubmed: 32959031
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Jan;59(1):91-5
pubmed: 18182545
J Endod. 2020 May;46(5):584-595
pubmed: 32273156
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 15;17(10):
pubmed: 32429193
Int J Oral Sci. 2020 Mar 3;12(1):9
pubmed: 32127517
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12168
pubmed: 32951286
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 19;17(8):
pubmed: 32325888
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):e14
pubmed: 32035030
Eur J Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(1):13-8
pubmed: 15674079
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Apr;73(2):344-9
pubmed: 15796643
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;17(8):
pubmed: 32331401
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(3):315-318
pubmed: 32277578
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 23;11:1540
pubmed: 32655463
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;41(10):1192-1193
pubmed: 32580790
Br Dent J. 2020 Apr;228(7):503-505
pubmed: 32277203
Psychol Med. 2021 Jan;51(2):201-211
pubmed: 33436130
Eur J Dent. 2020 Dec;14(S 01):S91-S96
pubmed: 33368064
BMJ. 2020 May 5;369:m1642
pubmed: 32371466