Estrogenicity of chemical mixtures revealed by a panel of bioassays.
Bioassay
Chemical mixture
Endocrine disrupting compound (EDC)
Environmental quality standard (EQS)
Estrogenicity
Hormone mixture
Journal
The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2021
01 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
21
02
2021
revised:
15
04
2021
accepted:
16
04
2021
pubmed:
7
5
2021
medline:
11
6
2021
entrez:
6
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Estrogenic compounds are widely released to surface waters and may cause adverse effects to sensitive aquatic species. Three hormones, estrone, 17β-estradiol and 17α-ethinylestradiol, are of particular concern as they are bioactive at very low concentrations. Current analytical methods are not all sensitive enough for monitoring these substances in water and do not cover mixture effects. Bioassays could complement chemical analysis since they detect the overall effect of complex mixtures. Here, four chemical mixtures and two hormone mixtures were prepared and tested as reference materials together with two environmental water samples by eight laboratories employing nine in vitro and in vivo bioassays covering different steps involved in the estrogenic response. The reference materials included priority substances under the European Water Framework Directive, hormones and other emerging pollutants. Each substance in the mixture was present at its proposed safety limit concentration (EQS) in the European legislation. The in vitro bioassays detected the estrogenic effect of chemical mixtures even when 17β-estradiol was not present but differences in responsiveness were observed. LiBERA was the most responsive, followed by LYES. The additive effect of the hormones was captured by ERα-CALUX, MELN, LYES and LiBERA. Particularly, all in vitro bioassays detected the estrogenic effects in environmental water samples (EEQ values in the range of 0.75-304 × EQS), although the concentrations of hormones were below the limit of quantification in analytical measurements. The present study confirms the applicability of reference materials for estrogenic effects' detection through bioassays and indicates possible methodological drawbacks of some of them that may lead to false negative/positive outcomes. The observed difference in responsiveness among bioassays - based on mixture composition - is probably due to biological differences between them, suggesting that panels of bioassays with different characteristics should be applied according to specific environmental pollution conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33957588
pii: S0048-9697(21)02355-X
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147284
pmc: PMC8210648
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Endocrine Disruptors
0
Estrogens
0
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Estrone
2DI9HA706A
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
147284Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019 Apr;411(10):2057-2069
pubmed: 30734083
Luminescence. 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):153-8
pubmed: 11312541
Environ Int. 2014 Mar;64:98-109
pubmed: 24384232
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 12;21(6):
pubmed: 32178293
J Environ Monit. 2008 May;10(5):612-21
pubmed: 18449398
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991 Sep;39(3):291-7
pubmed: 1911419
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012 Feb;19(2):585-91
pubmed: 21833630
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014 Sep;21(18):10970-82
pubmed: 24870285
Toxicol Sci. 2014 Sep;141(1):218-33
pubmed: 24958932
Aquat Toxicol. 2007 Nov 30;85(2):113-23
pubmed: 17875331
Water Res. 2018 Aug 1;139:10-18
pubmed: 29621713
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 30;9(7):e102658
pubmed: 25075862
Environ Int. 2017 Feb;99:107-119
pubmed: 28040262
Environ Pollut. 2020 Dec;267:115405
pubmed: 32866865
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Sep;37(9):2273-2280
pubmed: 29846006
Chemosphere. 2019 Jul;227:334-344
pubmed: 30999174
Toxicol Sci. 2005 Jan;83(1):136-48
pubmed: 15483189
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 Dec;39(12):2496-2508
pubmed: 32926747
Water Res. 2017 Oct 15;123:734-750
pubmed: 28728110
J Appl Toxicol. 2011 May;31(4):285-311
pubmed: 21462230
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(3):1940-56
pubmed: 24369993
Environ Int. 2019 Sep;130:104896
pubmed: 31195222
Comp Hepatol. 2004 May 2;3(1):2
pubmed: 15119955
Anal Chem. 2013 Aug 6;85(15):7248-56
pubmed: 23799293
Chemosphere. 2004 Dec;57(11):1649-55
pubmed: 15519410
Water Res. 2017 Mar 1;110:378-388
pubmed: 27836174
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Apr 12;19(4):
pubmed: 29649157
Sci Total Environ. 2008 Sep 1;402(2-3):318-29
pubmed: 18550148
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Nov;145:111602
pubmed: 32738369
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36069
pubmed: 22586461
Sci Total Environ. 1999 Aug 15;233(1-3):47-56
pubmed: 10492897
Environ Pollut. 2017 Jan;220(Pt B):1220-1230
pubmed: 27884472
J Chromatogr A. 2017 Dec 29;1530:185-191
pubmed: 29146425
Water Res. 2015 Oct 15;83:303-9
pubmed: 26177482
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 May 15;44(10):3853-60
pubmed: 20423077
Chem Res Toxicol. 2019 Aug 19;32(8):1646-1655
pubmed: 31313575
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 1;628-629:748-765
pubmed: 29454215