Patient delay and benefit of timely reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
acute coronary syndrome
chest pain
myocardial infarction
Journal
Open heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Titre abrégé: Open Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
31
03
2021
revised:
02
04
2021
accepted:
06
04
2021
entrez:
7
5
2021
pubmed:
8
5
2021
medline:
30
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), it is unknown how patient delay modulates the beneficial effects of timely reperfusion. To assess the prognostic significance of a contact-to-balloon time of less than 90 min on in-hospital mortality in different categories of symptom-onset-to-first-medical-contact (S2C) times. A total of 20 005 consecutive patients from the Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FITT-STEMI) programme treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. There were 1554 deaths (7.8%) with a J-shaped relationship between mortality and S2C time. Mortality was 10.0% in patients presenting within 1 hour, and 4.9%, 6.0% and 7.3% in patient groups with longer S2C intervals of 1-2 hours, 2-6 hours and 6-24 hours, respectively. Patients with a short S2C interval of less than 1 hour (S2C<60 min) had the highest survival benefit from timely reperfusion with PCI within 90 min (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.31, p<0.0001) as compared with the three groups with longer S2C intervals of 1 hour<S2C≤2 hours (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.59, p<0.0001), 2 hours<S2C≤6 hours (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.64, p<0.0001) and 6 hours<S2C≤24 hours (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.58, p<0.0001). Timely reperfusion with a contact-to-balloon time of less than 90 min is most effective in patients presenting with short S2C intervals of less than 1 hour, but has also beneficial effects in patients with S2C intervals of up to 24 hours. NCT00794001.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), it is unknown how patient delay modulates the beneficial effects of timely reperfusion.
AIMS
To assess the prognostic significance of a contact-to-balloon time of less than 90 min on in-hospital mortality in different categories of symptom-onset-to-first-medical-contact (S2C) times.
METHODS
A total of 20 005 consecutive patients from the Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FITT-STEMI) programme treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included.
RESULTS
There were 1554 deaths (7.8%) with a J-shaped relationship between mortality and S2C time. Mortality was 10.0% in patients presenting within 1 hour, and 4.9%, 6.0% and 7.3% in patient groups with longer S2C intervals of 1-2 hours, 2-6 hours and 6-24 hours, respectively. Patients with a short S2C interval of less than 1 hour (S2C<60 min) had the highest survival benefit from timely reperfusion with PCI within 90 min (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.31, p<0.0001) as compared with the three groups with longer S2C intervals of 1 hour<S2C≤2 hours (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.59, p<0.0001), 2 hours<S2C≤6 hours (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.64, p<0.0001) and 6 hours<S2C≤24 hours (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.58, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
Timely reperfusion with a contact-to-balloon time of less than 90 min is most effective in patients presenting with short S2C intervals of less than 1 hour, but has also beneficial effects in patients with S2C intervals of up to 24 hours.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT00794001.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33958491
pii: openhrt-2021-001650
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001650
pmc: PMC8103948
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00794001']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: TF reports personal fees for consultancies (including data monitoring committees) from Novartis, Bayer, Biogen, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Grünenthal, Pharmalog, SGS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Mediconomics and Roche, all outside the submitted work. Furthermore, he has received research funding by the European Commission for statistical analyses on the EUTrigTreat (NCT01209494) and EU-CERT-ICD (NCT02064192) clinical studies. All relationships declared are modest.
Références
J Cardiol. 2017 Jan;69(1):377-382
pubmed: 27720323
Circulation. 2004 Jun 8;109(22):2737-43
pubmed: 15159293
BMJ. 2012 May 23;344:e3257
pubmed: 22623632
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 1;101(1):46-52
pubmed: 18157964
JAMA. 2005 Jun 15;293(23):2865-72
pubmed: 15956631
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug;5(8):848-57
pubmed: 22917457
JAMA. 2010 Aug 18;304(7):763-71
pubmed: 20716739
Heart. 2006 Nov;92(11):1577-82
pubmed: 16740918
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;118(9):1334-1339
pubmed: 27666173
Coron Artery Dis. 2009 Sep;20(6):415-21
pubmed: 19641460
Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 1;39(13):1065-1074
pubmed: 29452351
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;87(7):1194-200
pubmed: 26332101
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177
pubmed: 28886621
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 1;44(5):980-7
pubmed: 15337207
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jun 6;47(11):2180-6
pubmed: 16750682
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013 Jan;28(1):30-6
pubmed: 22983884
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29;61(4):485-510
pubmed: 23256913
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Dec 1;108(11):1536-41
pubmed: 21906710
J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 11;8(1):
pubmed: 30641925
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Feb;29(1):24-32
pubmed: 27728959
Circulation. 1998 Mar 24;97(11):1042-5
pubmed: 9531250
Eur Heart J. 2013 Jan;34(2):121-9
pubmed: 22961945
Br Heart J. 1981 Mar;45(3):271-80
pubmed: 7470340
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 1;105(11):1528-34
pubmed: 20494656
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):599-604
pubmed: 21700244
Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 1;39(13):1075-1077
pubmed: 29452358
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e012188
pubmed: 31041869