CRISPR-Cas-mediated chromosome engineering for crop improvement and synthetic biology.
Journal
Nature plants
ISSN: 2055-0278
Titre abrégé: Nat Plants
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101651677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
15
02
2021
accepted:
31
03
2021
pubmed:
8
5
2021
medline:
5
8
2021
entrez:
7
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Plant breeding relies on the presence of genetic variation, as well as on the ability to break or stabilize genetic linkages between traits. The development of the genome-editing tool clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) has allowed breeders to induce genetic variability in a controlled and site-specific manner, and to improve traits with high efficiency. However, the presence of genetic linkages is a major obstacle to the transfer of desirable traits from wild species to their cultivated relatives. One way to address this issue is to create mutants with deficiencies in the meiotic recombination machinery, thereby enhancing global crossover frequencies between homologous parental chromosomes. Although this seemed to be a promising approach at first, thus far, no crossover frequencies could be enhanced in recombination-cold regions of the genome. Additionally, this approach can lead to unintended genomic instabilities due to DNA repair defects. Therefore, efforts have been undertaken to obtain predefined crossovers between homologues by inducing site-specific double-strand breaks (DSBs) in meiotic, as well as in somatic plant cells using CRISPR-Cas tools. However, this strategy has not been able to produce a substantial number of heritable homologous recombination-based crossovers. Most recently, heritable chromosomal rearrangements, such as inversions and translocations, have been obtained in a controlled way using CRISPR-Cas in plants. This approach unlocks a completely new way of manipulating genetic linkages, one in which the DSBs are induced in somatic cells, enabling the formation of chromosomal rearrangements in the megabase range, by DSB repair via non-homologous end-joining. This technology might also enable the restructuring of genomes more globally, resulting in not only the obtainment of synthetic plant chromosome, but also of novel plant species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33958776
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00910-4
pii: 10.1038/s41477-021-00910-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
566-573Références
Bailey-Serres, J., Parker, J. E., Ainsworth, E. A., Oldroyd, G. E. D. & Schroeder, J. I. Genetic strategies for improving crop yields. Nature 575, 109–118 (2019).
pubmed: 31695205
pmcid: 7024682
Wolter, F., Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. Plant breeding at the speed of light: the power of CRISPR/Cas to generate directed genetic diversity at multiple sites. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 176 (2019).
pubmed: 31046670
pmcid: 6498546
Lewis, R. S. & Rose, C. Agronomic performance of tobacco mosaic virus-resistant tobacco lines and hybrids possessing the resistance gene N introgressed on different chromosomes. Crop Sci. 50, 1339–1347 (2010).
Li, J., Chitwood, J., Menda, N., Mueller, L. & Hutton, S. F. Linkage between the I-3 gene for resistance to Fusarium wilt race 3 and increased sensitivity to bacterial spot in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 131, 145–155 (2018).
pubmed: 28986627
Zhang, Y., Pribil, M., Palmgren, M. & Gao, C. A CRISPR way for accelerating improvement of food crops. Nat. Food 1, 200–205 (2020).
Zaidi, S. S.-E.-A., Mahas, A., Vanderschuren, H. & Mahfouz, M. M. Engineering crops of the future: CRISPR approaches to develop climate-resilient and disease-resistant plants. Genome Biol. 21, 289 (2020).
pubmed: 33256828
pmcid: 7702697
Schindele, A., Dorn, A. & Puchta, H. CRISPR/Cas brings plant biology and breeding into the fast lane. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 61, 7–14 (2020).
pubmed: 31557657
Atkins, P. A. & Voytas, D. F. Overcoming bottlenecks in plant gene editing. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 54, 79–84 (2020).
pubmed: 32143167
Zhang, Y., Malzahn, A. A., Sretenovic, S. & Qi, Y. The emerging and uncultivated potential of CRISPR technology in plant science. Nat. Plants 5, 778–794 (2019).
pubmed: 31308503
Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
pubmed: 22745249
pmcid: 6286148
Puchta, H. The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 1–14 (2004).
pubmed: 15557293
Schmidt, C., Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. From gene editing to genome engineering: restructuring plant chromosomes via CRISPR/Cas. aBIOTECH 1, 21–31 (2020).
Rönspies, M., Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. CRISPR/Cas-mediated chromosome engineering: opening up a new avenue for plant breeding. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 177–183 (2021).
pubmed: 33258473
Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Chromosomes and cancer cells. Chromosome Res. 19, 433–444 (2011).
pubmed: 21190130
pmcid: 3770937
Park, C.-Y., Sung, J. J. & Kim, D.-W. Genome editing of structural variations: modeling and gene correction. Trends Biotechnol. 34, 548–561 (2016).
pubmed: 27016031
Brunet, E. & Jasin, M. Induction of chromosomal translocations with CRISPR-Cas9 and other nucleases: understanding the repair mechanisms that give rise to translocations. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1044, 15–25 (2018).
pubmed: 29956288
pmcid: 6333474
Hasty, P. & Montagna, C. Chromosomal rearrangements in cancer: detection and potential causal mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Oncol. 1, e29904 (2014).
pubmed: 26203462
pmcid: 4507279
Lakich, D., Kazazian, H. H. Jr, Antonarakis, S. E. & Gitschier, J. Inversions disrupting the factor VIII gene are a common cause of severe haemophilia A. Nat. Genet. 5, 236–241 (1993).
pubmed: 8275087
Bondeson, M. L. et al. Inversion of the IDS gene resulting from recombination with IDS-related sequences is a common cause of the Hunter syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 615–621 (1995).
pubmed: 7633410
Small, K., Iber, J. & Warren, S. T. Emerin deletion reveals a common X-chromosome inversion mediated by inverted repeats. Nat. Genet. 16, 96–99 (1997).
pubmed: 9140403
Park, C.-Y., Lee, D. R., Sung, J. J. & Kim, D.-W. Genome-editing technologies for gene correction of hemophilia. Hum. Genet. 135, 977–981 (2016).
pubmed: 27357631
pmcid: 4999461
Kirkpatrick, M. & Barton, N. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173, 419–434 (2006).
pubmed: 16204214
pmcid: 1461441
Fransz, P. et al. Molecular, genetic and evolutionary analysis of a paracentric inversion in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 88, 159–178 (2016).
pubmed: 27436134
pmcid: 5113708
Harewood, L. & Fraser, P. The impact of chromosomal rearrangements on regulation of gene expression. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, R76–R82 (2014).
pubmed: 24907073
Martin, G. et al. Chromosome reciprocal translocations have accompanied subspecies evolution in bananas. Plant J. 104, 1698–1711 (2020).
pubmed: 33067829
pmcid: 7839431
Wellenreuther, M. & Bernatchez, L. Eco-evolutionary genomics of chromosomal inversions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 427–440 (2018).
pubmed: 29731154
Beying, N., Schmidt, C., Pacher, M., Houben, A. & Puchta, H. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated induction of heritable chromosomal translocations in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 6, 638–645 (2020).
pubmed: 32451449
Schmidt, C. et al. Changing local recombination patterns in Arabidopsis by CRISPR/Cas mediated chromosome engineering. Nat. Commun. 11, 4418 (2020).
pubmed: 32887885
pmcid: 7474074
Schwartz, C. et al. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated 75.5-Mb inversion in maize. Nat. Plants 6, 1427–1431 (2020).
pubmed: 33299151
Taagen, E., Bogdanove, A. J. & Sorrells, M. E. Counting on crossovers: controlled recombination for plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 455–465 (2020).
pubmed: 31959421
Wang, Y. & Copenhaver, G. P. Meiotic recombination: mixing it up in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 577–609 (2018).
pubmed: 29489392
Lambing, C., Franklin, F. C. H. & Wang, C.-J. R. Understanding and manipulating meiotic recombination in plants. Plant Physiol. 173, 1530–1542 (2017).
pubmed: 28108697
pmcid: 5338670
Bergerat, A. et al. An atypical topoisomerase II from archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386, 414–417 (1997).
pubmed: 9121560
Crismani, W. et al. FANCM limits meiotic crossovers. Science 336, 1588–1590 (2012).
pubmed: 22723424
Hartung, F., Suer, S. & Puchta, H. Two closely related RecQ helicases have antagonistic roles in homologous recombination and DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18836–18841 (2007).
pubmed: 18000056
pmcid: 2141863
Séguéla-Arnaud, M. et al. Multiple mechanisms limit meiotic crossovers: TOP3α and two BLM homologs antagonize crossovers in parallel to FANCM. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4713–4718 (2015).
pubmed: 25825745
pmcid: 4403193
Dorn, A. et al. The topoisomerase 3α zinc-finger domain T1 of Arabidopsis thaliana is required for targeting the enzyme activity to Holliday junction-like DNA repair intermediates. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007674 (2018).
pubmed: 30222730
pmcid: 6160208
Séguéla-Arnaud, M. et al. RMI1 and TOP3α limit meiotic CO formation through their C-terminal domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 1860–1871 (2017).
pubmed: 27965412
de Maagd, R. A. CRISPR/Cas inactivation of RECQ4 increases homeologous crossovers in an interspecific tomato hybrid. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 805–813 (2020).
pubmed: 31483929
Girard, C. et al. AAA-ATPase FIDGETIN-LIKE 1 and helicase FANCM antagonize meiotic crossovers by distinct mechanisms. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005369 (2015).
pubmed: 26161528
pmcid: 4498898
Fernandes, J. B. et al. FIGL1 and its novel partner FLIP form a conserved complex that regulates homologous recombination. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007317 (2018).
pubmed: 29608566
pmcid: 5897033
Zhang, P. et al. The rice AAA-ATPase OsFIGNL1 is essential for male meiosis. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1639 (2017).
pubmed: 29021797
pmcid: 5624289
Mieulet, D. et al. Unleashing meiotic crossovers in crops. Nat. Plants 4, 1010–1016 (2018).
pubmed: 30478361
Pyatnitskaya, A., Borde, V. & de Muyt, A. Crossing and zipping: molecular duties of the ZMM proteins in meiosis. Chromosoma 128, 181–198 (2019).
pubmed: 31236671
Ziolkowski, P. A. et al. Natural variation and dosage of the HEI10 meiotic E3 ligase control Arabidopsis crossover recombination. Genes Dev. 31, 306–317 (2017).
pubmed: 28223312
pmcid: 5358726
Serra, H. et al. Massive crossover elevation via combination of HEI10 and recq4a recq4b during Arabidopsis meiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2437–2442 (2018).
pubmed: 29463699
pmcid: 5877939
Wang, K., Wang, C., Liu, Q., Liu, W. & Fu, Y. Increasing the genetic recombination frequency by partial loss of function of the synaptonemal complex in rice. Mol. Plant 8, 1295–1298 (2015).
pubmed: 25936677
Fernandes, J. B., Séguéla-Arnaud, M., Larchevêque, C., Lloyd, A. H. & Mercier, R. Unleashing meiotic crossovers in hybrid plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Ssci. USA 115, 2431–2436 (2018).
Hartung, F., Suer, S., Knoll, A., Wurz-Wildersinn, R. & Puchta, H. Topoisomerase 3α and RMI1 suppress somatic crossovers and are essential for resolution of meiotic recombination intermediates in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000285 (2008).
pubmed: 19096507
pmcid: 2588661
Mannuss, A. et al. RAD5A, RECQ4A, and MUS81 have specific functions in homologous recombination and define different pathways of DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 22, 3318–3330 (2010).
pubmed: 20971895
pmcid: 2990144
Schröpfer, S., Kobbe, D., Hartung, F., Knoll, A. & Puchta, H. Defining the roles of the N-terminal region and the helicase activity of RECQ4A in DNA repair and homologous recombination in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 1684–1697 (2014).
pubmed: 24174542
Knoll, A. et al. The Fanconi anemia ortholog FANCM ensures ordered homologous recombination in both somatic and meiotic cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 1448–1464 (2012).
pubmed: 22547783
pmcid: 3398556
Peciña, A. et al. Targeted stimulation of meiotic recombination. Cell 111, 173–184 (2002).
pubmed: 12408862
Sarno, R. et al. Programming sites of meiotic crossovers using Spo11 fusion proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, e164 (2017).
pubmed: 28977556
pmcid: 5737382
Yelina, N. E., Gonzalez-Jorge, S., Hirsz, D., Yang, Z. & Henderson, I. R. CRISPR targeting of MEIOTIC-TOPOISOMERASE VIB-dCas9 to a recombination hotspot is insufficient to increase crossover frequency in Arabidopsis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.01.429210 (2021).
Filler Hayut, S., Melamed Bessudo, C. & Levy, A. A. Targeted recombination between homologous chromosomes for precise breeding in tomato. Nat. Commun. 8, 15605 (2017).
pubmed: 28548094
pmcid: 5458649
Ben Shlush, I. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 induced somatic recombination at the CRTISO locus in tomato. Genes 12, 59 (2020).
pubmed: 33396568
pmcid: 7824628
Davis, L., Khoo, K. J., Zhang, Y. & Maizels, N. POLQ suppresses interhomolog recombination and loss of heterozygosity at targeted DNA breaks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 22900–22909 (2020).
pubmed: 32873648
pmcid: 7502765
Cheong, T.-C., Blasco, R. B. & Chiarle, R. The CRISPR/Cas9 System as a tool to engineer chromosomal translocation in vivo. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1044, 39–48 (2018).
pubmed: 29956290
Torres-Ruiz, R. et al. Efficient recreation of t(11;22) EWSR1-FLI1
Torres, R. et al. Engineering human tumour-associated chromosomal translocations with the RNA-guided CRISPR–Cas9 system. Nat. Commun. 5, 3964 (2014).
pubmed: 24888982
Lagutina, I. V. et al. Modeling of the human alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma Pax3–Foxo1 chromosome translocation in mouse myoblasts using CRISPR–Cas9 nuclease. PLoS Genet. 11, e1004951 (2015).
pubmed: 25659124
pmcid: 4319822
Choi, P. S. & Meyerson, M. Targeted genomic rearrangements using CRISPR/Cas technology. Nat. Commun. 5, 3728 (2014).
pubmed: 24759083
Luo, J., Sun, X., Cormack, B. P. & Boeke, J. D. Karyotype engineering by chromosome fusion leads to reproductive isolation in yeast. Nature 560, 392–396 (2018).
pubmed: 30069047
pmcid: 8223741
Shao, Y. et al. Creating a functional single-chromosome yeast. Nature 560, 331–335 (2018).
pubmed: 30069045
Fleiss, A. et al. Reshuffling yeast chromosomes with CRISPR/Cas9. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008332–e1008332 (2019).
pubmed: 31465441
pmcid: 6738639
Yadav, V., Sun, S., Coelho, M. A. & Heitman, J. Centromere scission drives chromosome shuffling and reproductive isolation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7917–7928 (2020).
pubmed: 32193338
pmcid: 7149388
Jayakodi, M. et al. The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding. Nature 588, 284–289 (2020).
pubmed: 33239781
pmcid: 7759462
Walkowiak, S. et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 588, 277–283 (2020).
pubmed: 33239791
pmcid: 7759465
Crow, T. et al. Gene regulatory effects of a large chromosomal inversion in highland maize. PLoS Genet. 16, e1009213 (2020).
pubmed: 33270639
pmcid: 7752097
Schmidt, C., Pacher, M. & Puchta, H. Efficient induction of heritable inversions in plant genomes using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant J. 98, 577–589 (2019).
pubmed: 30900787
Fransz, P. F. et al. Integrated cytogenetic map of chromosome arm 4S of A. thaliana: structural organization of heterochromatic knob and centromere region. Cell 100, 367–376 (2000).
pubmed: 10676818
Drouaud, J. et al. Variation in crossing-over rates across chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals the presence of meiotic recombination “hot spots”. Genome Res. 16, 106–114 (2006).
pubmed: 16344568
pmcid: 1356134
Zhang, Y., Cheng, Z., Ma, J., Xian, F. & Zhang, X. Characteristics of a novel male–female sterile watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) mutant. Sci. Horticulturae 140, 107–114 (2012).
Steinert, J., Schiml, S., Fauser, F. & Puchta, H. Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J. 84, 1295–1305 (2015).
pubmed: 26576927
Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. Engineering CRISPR/LbCas12a for highly efficient, temperature-tolerant plant gene editing. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1118–1120, https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13275 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/pbi.13275
pubmed: 31606929
Wolter, F., Klemm, J. & Puchta, H. Efficient in planta gene targeting in Arabidopsis using egg cell-specific expression of the Cas9 nuclease of Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J. 94, 735–746 (2018).
pubmed: 29573495
Mandáková, T. & Lysak, M. A. Post-polyploid diploidization and diversification through dysploid changes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 42, 55–65 (2018).
pubmed: 29567623
Liu, Y. et al. Rapid birth or death of centromeres on fragmented chromosomes in maize. Plant Cell 32, 3113–3123 (2020).
pubmed: 32817254
pmcid: 7534475
Wimmer, E., Mueller, S., Tumpey, T. M. & Taubenberger, J. K. Synthetic viruses: a new opportunity to understand and prevent viral disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 1163–1172 (2009).
pubmed: 20010599
pmcid: 2819212
Coradini, A. L. V., Hull, C. B. & Ehrenreich, I. M. Building genomes to understand biology. Nat. Commun. 11, 6177 (2020).
pubmed: 33268788
pmcid: 7710724
Dawe, R. K. Charting the path to fully synthetic plant chromosomes. Exp. Cell. Res. 390, 111951 (2020).
pubmed: 32151492
Liu, J. et al. Genome-scale sequence disruption following biolistic transformation in rice and maize. Plant Cell 31, 368–383 (2019).
pubmed: 30651345
pmcid: 6447018
Zhang, H. et al. Stable integration of an engineered megabase repeat array into the maize genome. Plant J. 70, 357–365 (2012).
pubmed: 22233334