Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1).
bortezomib
melphalan
multiple myeloma
response criteria
Journal
Japanese journal of clinical oncology
ISSN: 1465-3621
Titre abrégé: Jpn J Clin Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0313225
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2021
01 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
28
01
2021
revised:
14
04
2021
accepted:
19
04
2021
pubmed:
8
5
2021
medline:
8
7
2021
entrez:
7
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib. Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment. Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation. The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib.
METHODS
METHODS
Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33959770
pii: 6271010
doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyab066
pmc: PMC8246272
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bortezomib
69G8BD63PP
Prednisolone
9PHQ9Y1OLM
Melphalan
Q41OR9510P
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1059-1066Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
ID : JP19ck0106348
Organisme : National Cancer Center
ID : 2020-J-3
Pays : Republic of Korea
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.
Références
Br J Haematol. 2021 Feb;192(3):531-541
pubmed: 32583431
N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 28;359(9):906-17
pubmed: 18753647
Blood. 2010 Aug 5;116(5):679-86
pubmed: 20385792
Leukemia. 2006 Sep;20(9):1467-73
pubmed: 16855634
Blood. 2015 May 14;125(20):3059-68
pubmed: 25838346
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):e328-e346
pubmed: 27511158
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):519-527
pubmed: 28017406
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Oct 2;10(10):95
pubmed: 33009363
Br J Haematol. 1998 Sep;102(5):1115-23
pubmed: 9753033
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 8;378(6):518-528
pubmed: 29231133