Extracorporeal support for trauma: A trauma quality improvement project (TQIP) analysis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Abbreviated Injury Scale
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Anticoagulants
/ therapeutic use
Case-Control Studies
Databases, Factual
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Female
Glasgow Coma Scale
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Propensity Score
Proportional Hazards Models
Quality Improvement
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
/ etiology
Retrospective Studies
Thoracic Injuries
/ complications
Treatment Outcome
Wounds and Injuries
/ complications
Young Adult
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Trauma
Trauma quality improvement project
Journal
The American journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1532-8171
Titre abrégé: Am J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
revised:
01
04
2021
accepted:
26
04
2021
pubmed:
8
5
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
7
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in trauma patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) continues to evolve. The objective of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of trauma patients with ARDS who received ECMO to a propensity matched cohort of patients who underwent conventional management. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried from 2013 to 2016 for all patients with ARDS and those who received ECMO. Demographics, as well as clinical, injury, intervention, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Patients with ARDS were divided into two groups, those who received ECMO and those who did not. A propensity score analysis was performed using the following criteria: age, gender, vital signs (HR, SBP) and GCS on admission, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score in several body regions. Outcomes between the groups were subsequently compared using univariate as well as Cox regression analyses. Secondary outcomes such as hospitalization (HLOS), ICU length-of-stay (LOS) and ventilation days stratified for patient demographics, timing of ECMO and anticoagulation status were compared. Over the 3-year study period, 8990 patients with ARDS were identified from the TQIP registry. Following exclusion, 3680 were included in the final analysis, of which 97 (2.6%) received ECMO. On univariate analysis following matching, patients who underwent ECMO had lower overall hospital mortality (23 vs 50%, p < 0.001) with higher rates of complications (p < 0.005), including longer HLOS. In those undergoing ECMO, early initiation (<7 days) was associated with shorter HLOS, ICU LOS, and fewer ventilator days. No difference was observed between the two groups with regard to anticoagulation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in trauma patients with ARDS may be associated with improved survival, especially for young patients with thoracic injuries, early in the course of ARDS. Anticoagulation while on circuit was not associated with increased risk of hemorrhage or mortality, even in the setting of head injuries. The mortality benefit suggested with ECMO comes at the expense of a potential increase in complication rate and prolonged hospitalization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33962131
pii: S0735-6757(21)00369-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.083
pmc: PMC9758480
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
170-176Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):512-9
pubmed: 24164955
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 May;33(5):658-62
pubmed: 25722287
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun 1;189(11):1374-82
pubmed: 24693864
BMJ. 2007 Apr 14;334(7597):779
pubmed: 17383982
Perfusion. 2015 Jul;30(5):407-9
pubmed: 25313096
Injury. 2017 Jan;48(1):121-126
pubmed: 27866648
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1685-93
pubmed: 16236739
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16
pubmed: 20843245
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1648-1659
pubmed: 28936695
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Dec;37(12):1932-41
pubmed: 21997128
Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1351-63
pubmed: 19762075
JAMA. 2011 Oct 19;306(15):1659-68
pubmed: 21976615
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jan;82(1):165-173
pubmed: 27779577
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 May;76(5):1275-81
pubmed: 24747460
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(36):e12223
pubmed: 30200143
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68
pubmed: 23688302
Injury. 2009 Jan;40(1):77-83
pubmed: 19117558
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0148844
pubmed: 26871937
Resuscitation. 2010 Jul;81(7):804-9
pubmed: 20378236
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Feb;11(1):43-9
pubmed: 15659944
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 May;72(5):1444-7
pubmed: 22673280
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 24;378(21):1965-1975
pubmed: 29791822
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):197-207; quiz 208-9
pubmed: 16258347
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Dec;79(6):1049-53; discussion 1053-4
pubmed: 26680141
Chest. 2007 Feb;131(2):554-62
pubmed: 17296661
J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):638-45
pubmed: 10217227
Chest. 1995 Apr;107(4):1083-8
pubmed: 7705120
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1253-1263
pubmed: 28459336