Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Innovative Therapy for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Hormone-Sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer.


Journal

Clinical genitourinary cancer
ISSN: 1938-0682
Titre abrégé: Clin Genitourin Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101260955

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 18 01 2021
revised: 24 03 2021
accepted: 27 03 2021
pubmed: 9 5 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 8 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The optimal therapeutic strategies for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) followed by metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), in terms of cost and effectiveness, remains unknown. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of various potential strategies, from the start of first-line treatment in mHSPC to the death of the patients. Two Markov decision-analysis models were developed, one for cohort A "asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients in mCRPC", and one for cohort B "symptomatic patients in mCRPC". Each strategy reflects daily practice for mHSPC until progression in mCRPC from the start of first treatment regimen with either docetaxel or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) in mHSPC to the death of the patient. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the French public health care system perspective. Only direct medical costs were included. Survival data were extracted from results of published randomized clinical trials. For cohort A, docetaxel followed by AA is the most cost-effective therapeutic strategy (€96,925 for 4.24 life-years). For cohort B, docetaxel followed by docetaxel is the most cost-effective therapeutic strategy (€81,463 for 4.05 life-years). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our results except for a price reduction of 70% for AA or enzalutamide. Our approach is innovative to the extent that our analysis considers various potential strategies for metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Our economic evaluation suggests that a price reduction of AA or enzalutamide impacts on the results. This approach must continue, including new drugs for patients with mPC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The optimal therapeutic strategies for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) followed by metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), in terms of cost and effectiveness, remains unknown. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of various potential strategies, from the start of first-line treatment in mHSPC to the death of the patients.
METHODS
Two Markov decision-analysis models were developed, one for cohort A "asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients in mCRPC", and one for cohort B "symptomatic patients in mCRPC". Each strategy reflects daily practice for mHSPC until progression in mCRPC from the start of first treatment regimen with either docetaxel or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) in mHSPC to the death of the patient. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the French public health care system perspective. Only direct medical costs were included. Survival data were extracted from results of published randomized clinical trials.
RESULTS
For cohort A, docetaxel followed by AA is the most cost-effective therapeutic strategy (€96,925 for 4.24 life-years). For cohort B, docetaxel followed by docetaxel is the most cost-effective therapeutic strategy (€81,463 for 4.05 life-years). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our results except for a price reduction of 70% for AA or enzalutamide.
CONCLUSION
Our approach is innovative to the extent that our analysis considers various potential strategies for metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Our economic evaluation suggests that a price reduction of AA or enzalutamide impacts on the results. This approach must continue, including new drugs for patients with mPC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33962909
pii: S1558-7673(21)00085-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.022
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hormones 0
Docetaxel 15H5577CQD
Abiraterone Acetate EM5OCB9YJ6
Prednisone VB0R961HZT

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e326-e333

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Rémi Pelloux-Prayer (R)

Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Philomène Schiele (P)

Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Stéphane Oudard (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, University of Paris, Paris, France.

Gwenaëlle Gravis (G)

Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Inserm, CNRS, CRCM, Marseille, France.

François Kleinclauss (F)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Gilles Crehange (G)

Curie Institute, Paris, France.

Christophe Hennequin (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France.

Alicia K Morgans (AK)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, United States.

Lionel Geoffrois (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Cancérologie de Lorraine Institute, Nancy, France.

Samuel Limat (S)

Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France; INSERM UMR 1098, University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.

Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France; INSERM UMR 1098, University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.

Virginie Nerich (V)

Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France; INSERM UMR 1098, University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Besançon, France. Electronic address: v1nerich@chu-besancon.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH