Immune cell composition and functional marker dynamics from multiplexed immunohistochemistry to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the WSG-ADAPT-TN trial.
Adult
B7-H1 Antigen
/ metabolism
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ metabolism
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes
/ drug effects
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes
/ drug effects
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Clinical Decision-Making
Female
Germany
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating
/ drug effects
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Predictive Value of Tests
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ metabolism
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Tumor Microenvironment
/ immunology
biomarkers
breast neoplasms
immune evation
programmed cell death 1 receptor
tumor
tumor microenvironment
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
accepted:
24
02
2021
entrez:
8
5
2021
pubmed:
9
5
2021
medline:
6
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The association of early changes in the immune infiltrate during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with pathological complete response (pCR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unexplored. Multiplexed immunohistochemistry was performed in matched tumor biopsies obtained at baseline and after 3 weeks of NACT from 66 patients from the West German Study Group Adjuvant Dynamic Marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy Trial Optimizing Risk Assessment and Therapy Response Prediction in Early Breast Cancer - Triple Negative Breast Cancer (WSG-ADAPT-TN) trial. Association between CD4, CD8, CD73, T cells, PD1-positive CD4 and CD8 cells, and PDL1 levels in stroma and/or tumor at baseline, week 3 and 3-week change with pCR was evaluated with univariable logistic regression. Compared with no change in immune cell composition and functional markers, transition from 'cold' to 'hot' (below-median and above-median marker level at baseline, respectively) suggested higher pCR rates for PD1-positive CD4 (tumor: OR=1.55, 95% CI 0.45 to 5.42; stroma: OR=2.65, 95% CI 0.65 to 10.71) and PD1-positive CD8 infiltrates (tumor: OR=1.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 5.20; stroma: OR=1.25, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.84; tumor+stroma: OR=1.62, 95% CI 0.51 to 5.12). No pCR was observed after 'hot-to-cold' transition in PD1-positive CD8 cells. pCR rates appeared lower after hot-to-cold transitions in T cells (tumor: OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.34; stroma: OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.25; tumor+stroma: OR=0.00, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.04) and PD1-positive CD4 cells (tumor: OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.35; stroma: OR=0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.92; tumor+stroma: OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.94). Higher pCR rates collated with 'altered' distribution (levels below-median and above-median in tumor and stroma, respectively) of T cell (OR=3.50, 95% CI 0.84 to 14.56) and PD1-positive CD4 cells (OR=4.50, 95% CI 1.01 to 20.14). Our exploratory findings indicate that comprehensive analysis of early immune infiltrate dynamics complements currently investigated predictive markers for pCR and may have a potential to improve guidance for individualized de-escalation/escalation strategies in TNBC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The association of early changes in the immune infiltrate during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with pathological complete response (pCR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unexplored.
METHODS
Multiplexed immunohistochemistry was performed in matched tumor biopsies obtained at baseline and after 3 weeks of NACT from 66 patients from the West German Study Group Adjuvant Dynamic Marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy Trial Optimizing Risk Assessment and Therapy Response Prediction in Early Breast Cancer - Triple Negative Breast Cancer (WSG-ADAPT-TN) trial. Association between CD4, CD8, CD73, T cells, PD1-positive CD4 and CD8 cells, and PDL1 levels in stroma and/or tumor at baseline, week 3 and 3-week change with pCR was evaluated with univariable logistic regression.
RESULTS
Compared with no change in immune cell composition and functional markers, transition from 'cold' to 'hot' (below-median and above-median marker level at baseline, respectively) suggested higher pCR rates for PD1-positive CD4 (tumor: OR=1.55, 95% CI 0.45 to 5.42; stroma: OR=2.65, 95% CI 0.65 to 10.71) and PD1-positive CD8 infiltrates (tumor: OR=1.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 5.20; stroma: OR=1.25, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.84; tumor+stroma: OR=1.62, 95% CI 0.51 to 5.12). No pCR was observed after 'hot-to-cold' transition in PD1-positive CD8 cells. pCR rates appeared lower after hot-to-cold transitions in T cells (tumor: OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.34; stroma: OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.25; tumor+stroma: OR=0.00, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.04) and PD1-positive CD4 cells (tumor: OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.35; stroma: OR=0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.92; tumor+stroma: OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.94). Higher pCR rates collated with 'altered' distribution (levels below-median and above-median in tumor and stroma, respectively) of T cell (OR=3.50, 95% CI 0.84 to 14.56) and PD1-positive CD4 cells (OR=4.50, 95% CI 1.01 to 20.14).
CONCLUSION
Our exploratory findings indicate that comprehensive analysis of early immune infiltrate dynamics complements currently investigated predictive markers for pCR and may have a potential to improve guidance for individualized de-escalation/escalation strategies in TNBC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33963012
pii: jitc-2020-002198
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002198
pmc: PMC8108653
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
CD274 protein, human
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):259-71
pubmed: 25214542
Int J Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;146(1):262-271
pubmed: 31162838
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Feb 6;7(1):34
pubmed: 30728081
J Breast Cancer. 2018 Jun;21(2):124-133
pubmed: 29963107
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 12;9(12):e115103
pubmed: 25501357
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3867-3876
pubmed: 29053400
Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):R126
pubmed: 22151962
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Mar;18(3):197-218
pubmed: 30610226
Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1279-1288
pubmed: 31095287
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 27;382(9):810-821
pubmed: 32101663
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;51(2):649-663
pubmed: 30064200
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 May 14;22(1):47
pubmed: 32408905
J Clin Invest. 2011 Jul;121(7):2750-67
pubmed: 21633166
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2108-2121
pubmed: 30345906
Virchows Arch. 2020 Apr;476(4):569-576
pubmed: 31853625
Histopathology. 2018 Feb;72(3):449-459
pubmed: 28851100
J Pathol. 2020 Apr;250(5):667-684
pubmed: 32129476
J Transl Med. 2018 Apr 4;16(1):87
pubmed: 29615063
JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):676-684
pubmed: 32053137
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec;48(18):3342-54
pubmed: 22766518
Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):611-618
pubmed: 24401929
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 04;17:124
pubmed: 26341640
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 May 12;6:16
pubmed: 32411818
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Apr;132(3):793-805
pubmed: 21562709
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804
pubmed: 22508812
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Jan 15;10:91-103
pubmed: 29391830
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Apr 1;21(7):1688-98
pubmed: 25208879
Ann Oncol. 2020 May;31(5):569-581
pubmed: 32278621
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1090-1100
pubmed: 32966830
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):479-489
pubmed: 32259782
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jun 1;110(6):628-637
pubmed: 29228315
Cell. 2018 Sep 6;174(6):1373-1387.e19
pubmed: 30193111
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 20;33(9):983-91
pubmed: 25534375
Nature. 2017 Jan 18;541(7637):321-330
pubmed: 28102259
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72
pubmed: 24529560
Ann Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;30(12):1941-1949
pubmed: 31566659
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Mar 15;22(6):1499-509
pubmed: 26515496