Prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean in women with diabetic disorders and no prior vaginal delivery.
cesarean delivery
diabetes
gestational diabetes mellitus
predictors
trial of labor
vaginal birth
Journal
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
revised:
14
04
2021
received:
11
03
2021
accepted:
07
05
2021
pubmed:
11
5
2021
medline:
25
3
2022
entrez:
10
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To study the factors associated with successful trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) among women with diabetes and no prior vaginal delivery and compare with TOLAC in nondiabetic women. A retrospective study including all women undergoing TOLAC who had no prior vaginal delivery between March 2011 and June 2020 at Sheba Medical Center. Women with diabetic disorders were compared with those without. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with TOLAC success. Of 2144 deliveries with TOLAC, 163 (7.6%) were to women with a diabetic disorder. TOLAC success rate was comparable between diabetic and nondiabetic women (124 [76.1%] vs 1513 [76.4%], respectively; P = 0.931). Uterine rupture rate was 1.1% (23 out of 2144). Among women with diabetes the uterine rupture rate was 0.6% (1 out of 163) and did not differ between the success or fail TOLAC groups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that epidural anesthesia and cervical effacement were the only independent factors associated with TOLAC success in women with diabetes (adjusted OR 3.32; 95% CI, 1.31-8.69, P = 0.011 and aOR 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07, P = 0.007, respectively). TOLAC in women with diabetes with no prior vaginal delivery has a high success rate. Epidural analgesia is the only modifiable independent predictor of TOLAC success.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
165-172Informations de copyright
© 2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Références
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110-e127.
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67(8):1-50.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):e73-e77.
Guise J-M, Berlin M, McDonagh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfand M. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):420-429.
Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581-2589.
Regan J, Keup C, Wolfe K, Snyder C, DeFranco E. Vaginal birth after cesarean success in high-risk women: a population-based study. J Perinatol. 2015;35(4):252-257.
Guise JM, Keup C, Wolfe K, Snyder C, Defranco E. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010;191:1-397.
Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, et al. New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(4):967-981.
Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M. Epidemiology of gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2004;21(2):103-113.
Evers IM, de Valk HW, Visser GH. Risk of complications of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: nationwide prospective study in the Netherlands. BMJ. 2004;328(7445):915.
Hunt KJ, Schuller KL. The increasing prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007;34(2):173-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2007.03.002.
Gonen R, Tamir A, Degani S, Ohel G. Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: a proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score. Am J Perinatol. 2004;21(8):447-453.
Harper LM, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Macones GA. Vaginal birth after cesarean for cephalopelvic disproportion: effect of birth weight difference on success. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):343-348.
Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Sammel MD, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: does maternal age affect safety and success? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):114-120.
Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1016-1023.
Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806-812.
Coleman TL, Randall H, Graves W, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean among women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(6):1104-1107.
Dharan VB, Srinivas SK, Parry S, Ratcliffe SJ, Macones G. Pregestational diabetes: a risk factor for vaginal birth after cesarean section failure? Am J Perinatol. 2010;27(3):265-270.
Cormier CM, Landon MB, Lai Y, et al. White's classification of maternal diabetes and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success in women undergoing a trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(1):60-64.
Ganer Herman H, Kogan Z, Bar J, Kovo M. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery for pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(1):84-88.
Lehmann S, Baghestan E, Børdahl PE, Irgens LM, Rasmussen SA. Trial of labor after cesarean section in risk pregnancies: a population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(7):894-904.
Marchiano D, Elkousy M, Stevens E, Peipert J, Macones G. Diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus does not influence the success rates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(3):790-796.
Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(10):693-701.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(Suppl 1):S11-S61.
Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144(7):768-773.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):e1-e25.
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology. 1984;150(2):535-540.
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181(1):129-133.
Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimouni FB, Gorfein I, Gordon ES. Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7(5):311-314.
Juhasz G, Gyamfi C, Gyamfi P, Tocce K, Stone JL. Effect of body mass index and excessive weight gain on success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(4):741-746.
Biesty LM, Egan AM, Dunne F, et al. Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes and their infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012948
Cousins L. Pregnancy complications among diabetic women: review 1965-1985. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1987;42(3):140-149.
Becker T, Vermeulen MJ, Wyatt PR, Meier C, Ray JG. Prepregnancy diabetes and risk of placental vascular disease. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(10):2496-2498.
Levin G, Mankuta D, Yossef E, et al. Trial of labor after cesarean in older women who never delivered vaginally. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;245:89-93.
Levin G, Meyer M, Mor M, et al. Trial of labor after cesarean in adolescents - a multicenter study. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020;33(4):398-402.
Grisaru-Granovsky S, Bas-Lando M, Drukker L, et al. Epidural analgesia at trial of labor after cesarean (TOLC): a significant adjunct to successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). J Perinat Med. 2018;46(3):261-269.
Maier JT, Metz M, Watermann N, et al. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin. J Perinat Med. 2018;46(3):299-307.