Multitask Learning Based Three-Dimensional Striatal Segmentation of MRI: fMRI and PET Objective Assessments.
MRI
PET
multitask learning
striatal segmentation
Journal
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
ISSN: 1522-2586
Titre abrégé: J Magn Reson Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9105850
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
revised:
22
04
2021
received:
05
03
2021
accepted:
23
04
2021
pubmed:
11
5
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
10
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent studies have established a clear topographical and functional organization of projections to and from complex subdivisions of the striatum. Manual segmentation of these functional subdivisions is labor-intensive and time-consuming, and automated methods are not as reliable as manual segmentation. To utilize multitask learning (MTL) as a method to segment subregions of the striatum consisting of pre-commissural putamen (prePU), pre-commissural caudate (preCA), post-commissural putamen (postPU), post-commissural caudate (postCA), and ventral striatum (VST). Retrospective. Eighty-seven total data sets from patients with schizophrenia and matched controls. 1.5 T and 3.0 T, T MTL-generated segmentations were compared to the Imperial College London Clinical Imaging Center (CIC) atlas. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to compare the automated methods to manual segmentations. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging: 60 minutes of emission data were acquired using [ Pearson correlation and paired t-test. MTL-generated segmentations showed excellent spatial agreement with manual (DSC ≥0.72 across all striatal subregions). BP Across both PET and fMRI task-based assessments, results from MTL-generated segmentations more closely corresponded to results from manually drawn ROIs than CIC-generated segmentations did. Therefore, the proposed MTL approach is a fast and reliable method for three-dimensional striatal subregion segmentation with results comparable to manually segmented ROIs. 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Recent studies have established a clear topographical and functional organization of projections to and from complex subdivisions of the striatum. Manual segmentation of these functional subdivisions is labor-intensive and time-consuming, and automated methods are not as reliable as manual segmentation.
PURPOSE
To utilize multitask learning (MTL) as a method to segment subregions of the striatum consisting of pre-commissural putamen (prePU), pre-commissural caudate (preCA), post-commissural putamen (postPU), post-commissural caudate (postCA), and ventral striatum (VST).
STUDY TYPE
Retrospective.
POPULATION
Eighty-seven total data sets from patients with schizophrenia and matched controls.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE
1.5 T and 3.0 T, T
ASSESSMENT
MTL-generated segmentations were compared to the Imperial College London Clinical Imaging Center (CIC) atlas. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to compare the automated methods to manual segmentations. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging: 60 minutes of emission data were acquired using [
STATISTICAL TESTS
Pearson correlation and paired t-test.
RESULTS
MTL-generated segmentations showed excellent spatial agreement with manual (DSC ≥0.72 across all striatal subregions). BP
DATA CONCLUSION
Across both PET and fMRI task-based assessments, results from MTL-generated segmentations more closely corresponded to results from manually drawn ROIs than CIC-generated segmentations did. Therefore, the proposed MTL approach is a fast and reliable method for three-dimensional striatal subregion segmentation with results comparable to manually segmented ROIs.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33970510
doi: 10.1002/jmri.27682
pmc: PMC9204799
mid: NIHMS1812380
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1623-1635Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K01 MH107763
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K23 MH115291
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : P50 MH086404
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R21 MH099509
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
J Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jun;26(6):794-805
pubmed: 21768159
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 1;73(8):862-70
pubmed: 27145361
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 May 1;69(9):847-56
pubmed: 21195388
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Dec 1;274:146-153
pubmed: 27777000
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jun;35(6):2852-60
pubmed: 24123377
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;173(1):69-77
pubmed: 26315980
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:479-497
pubmed: 26477650
Med Phys. 2020 Oct;47(10):4928-4938
pubmed: 32687608
J Neurosci. 2000 Mar 15;20(6):2369-82
pubmed: 10704511
Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 15;80(8):617-26
pubmed: 27056754
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;69(8):776-86
pubmed: 22474070
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 15;170:456-470
pubmed: 28450139
Neuroimage. 1996 Dec;4(3 Pt 1):153-8
pubmed: 9345505
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 15;170:182-198
pubmed: 28259781
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):264-77
pubmed: 20600980
Neuroimage. 2022 Apr 1;249:118907
pubmed: 35033673
J Neurol. 2000 Sep;247 Suppl 5:V1-15
pubmed: 11081799
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Sep;27(9):520-7
pubmed: 15331233
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003 Mar;23(3):285-300
pubmed: 12621304
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:105-24
pubmed: 23668970
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):85-93
pubmed: 17056276
Cereb Cortex. 2014 May;24(5):1165-77
pubmed: 23283687
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Oct;108(8):2242-63
pubmed: 22832566
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000 Feb;20(2):225-43
pubmed: 10698059
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Aug;82(2):786-795
pubmed: 30957936
Neuroimage. 2020 Dec;223:117287
pubmed: 32853816
Brain. 2008 Apr;131(Pt 4):1046-56
pubmed: 18334537
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001 Sep;21(9):1034-57
pubmed: 11524609
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;23(6):1506-1511
pubmed: 28507321
Magn Reson Med. 1996 Mar;35(3):346-55
pubmed: 8699946
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007 Sep;27(9):1533-9
pubmed: 17519979
Int J Eat Disord. 2015 Mar;48(2):206-14
pubmed: 24634102