The effect of native knee rotation on the tibial-tubercle-trochlear-groove distance in patients with patellar instability: an analysis of MRI and CT measurements.
CT
Knee flexion
Knee rotation
MRI
Patellar instability
TTTG
Tibial-tubercle-trochlear-groove
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
31
03
2021
accepted:
03
05
2021
pubmed:
13
5
2021
medline:
4
10
2022
entrez:
12
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to quantify the effect of lower limb rotational parameters on the difference in the tibial-tubercle-trochlear-groove (TTTG) distance when assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in patients with patellar instability. It was hypothesized that an increased native knee rotation angle significantly contributes to an underestimation of TTTG by MRI. Forty patients with patellar instability who had undergone standard radiographs, MRI and CT scans were included in this retrospective study. A musculoskeletal radiologist assessed all imaging for TTTG, femoral and tibial rotation, knee rotation and flexion angle, and trochlear dysplasia. ΔTTTG was defined as the TTTG measured on MRI subtracted from the TTTG measured on CT. Statistical analysis determined the effect of these parameters on the calculated difference between TTTG when measured on CT and MRI. Equal knee flexion in MRI and CT resulted in a ΔTTTG of 0.1 ± 0.3 mm compared to 4.0 ± 3.3 mm in patients with different knee flexion angles in both imaging acquisitions (p = 0.036). The knee rotation angle measured on CT (native knee rotation angle) was negatively correlated with ΔTTTG (r = - 0.365; p = 0.002), while neither tibial nor femoral rotation showed any associations with TTTG (n.s.). Trochlear dysplasia did not show any significant correlation with ΔTTTG, regardless of classification by Dejour or Lippacher (n.s.). Both the native knee rotation angle and the MRI knee flexion angle were independent predictors of ΔTTTG, yet with an opposing effect (knee rotation: 95% Confidence Interval [CI] for β - 0.468 to - 0.154, p < 0.001; knee flexion 95% CI for β 0.292 to 0.587, p < 0.001). Patients with a native knee rotation angle > 20° showed a ΔTTTG of - 5.8 ± 4.0 mm (MRI rather overestimates TTTG) compared to 0.9 ± 4.1 mm Δ TTTG (MRI rather underestimates TTTG) in patients with < 20° native knee rotation angle. The native knee rotation angle is an independent, inversely correlated predictor of ΔTTTG, thus opposing the effect of knee flexion during MRI acquisition. Consequently, these results suggest that not only knee flexion but also knee rotation should be appreciated when assessing TTTG during patellar instability diagnostic evaluation as it can potentially lead to a false estimation of the TTTG distance on MRI. Level III.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to quantify the effect of lower limb rotational parameters on the difference in the tibial-tubercle-trochlear-groove (TTTG) distance when assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in patients with patellar instability. It was hypothesized that an increased native knee rotation angle significantly contributes to an underestimation of TTTG by MRI.
METHODS
METHODS
Forty patients with patellar instability who had undergone standard radiographs, MRI and CT scans were included in this retrospective study. A musculoskeletal radiologist assessed all imaging for TTTG, femoral and tibial rotation, knee rotation and flexion angle, and trochlear dysplasia. ΔTTTG was defined as the TTTG measured on MRI subtracted from the TTTG measured on CT. Statistical analysis determined the effect of these parameters on the calculated difference between TTTG when measured on CT and MRI.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Equal knee flexion in MRI and CT resulted in a ΔTTTG of 0.1 ± 0.3 mm compared to 4.0 ± 3.3 mm in patients with different knee flexion angles in both imaging acquisitions (p = 0.036). The knee rotation angle measured on CT (native knee rotation angle) was negatively correlated with ΔTTTG (r = - 0.365; p = 0.002), while neither tibial nor femoral rotation showed any associations with TTTG (n.s.). Trochlear dysplasia did not show any significant correlation with ΔTTTG, regardless of classification by Dejour or Lippacher (n.s.). Both the native knee rotation angle and the MRI knee flexion angle were independent predictors of ΔTTTG, yet with an opposing effect (knee rotation: 95% Confidence Interval [CI] for β - 0.468 to - 0.154, p < 0.001; knee flexion 95% CI for β 0.292 to 0.587, p < 0.001). Patients with a native knee rotation angle > 20° showed a ΔTTTG of - 5.8 ± 4.0 mm (MRI rather overestimates TTTG) compared to 0.9 ± 4.1 mm Δ TTTG (MRI rather underestimates TTTG) in patients with < 20° native knee rotation angle.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The native knee rotation angle is an independent, inversely correlated predictor of ΔTTTG, thus opposing the effect of knee flexion during MRI acquisition. Consequently, these results suggest that not only knee flexion but also knee rotation should be appreciated when assessing TTTG during patellar instability diagnostic evaluation as it can potentially lead to a false estimation of the TTTG distance on MRI.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33978809
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03947-4
pii: 10.1007/s00402-021-03947-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3149-3155Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, Silva P, Davis DK, Elias DA et al (2004) Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 32:1114–1121
doi: 10.1177/0363546503260788
Charles MD, Haloman S, Chen L, Ward SR, Fithian D, Afra R (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging-based topographical differences between control and recurrent patellofemoral instability patients. Am J Sports Med 41:374–384
doi: 10.1177/0363546512472441
Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C (1994) Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:19–26
doi: 10.1007/BF01552649
Monk AP, Doll HA, Gibbons CL, Ostlere S, Beard DJ, Gill HS et al (2011) The patho-anatomy of patellofemoral subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1341–1347
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B10.27205
Balcarek P, Jung K, Ammon J, Walde TA, Frosch S, Schuttrumpf JP et al (2010) Anatomy of lateral patellar instability: trochlear dysplasia and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance is more pronounced in women who dislocate the patella. Am J Sports Med 38:2320–2327
doi: 10.1177/0363546510373887
Balcarek P, Jung K, Frosch KH, Sturmer KM (2011) Value of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in patellar instability in the young athlete. Am J Sports Med 39:1756–1761
doi: 10.1177/0363546511404883
Carlson VR, Boden BP, Shen A, Jackson JN, Yao L, Sheehan FT (2017) The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance is greater in patients with patellofemoral pain: implications for the origin of pain and clinical interventions. Am J Sports Med 45:1110–1116
doi: 10.1177/0363546516681002
Goutallier D, Bernageau J, Lecudonnec B (1978) The measurement of the tibial tuberosity. Patella groove distanced technique and results (author’s transl). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 64:423–428
pubmed: 152950
Tan SHS, Lim BY, Chng KSJ, Doshi C, Wong FKL, Lim AKS et al (2020) The difference between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance for patients with or without patellofemoral instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg 33:768–776
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688563
Dietrich TJ, Betz M, Pfirrmann CW, Koch PP, Fucentese SF (2014) End-stage extension of the knee and its influence on tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TTTG) in asymptomatic volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:214–218
doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2357-z
Camp CL, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ, Levy BA, Bond JR, Collins MS et al (2013) CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distances are not equivalent in patients with patellar instability. Am J Sports Med 41:1835–1840
doi: 10.1177/0363546513484895
Wilcox JJ, Snow BJ, Aoki SK, Hung M, Burks RT (2012) Does landmark selection affect the reliability of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove measurements using MRI? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2253–2260
doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2269-8
Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S (2010) MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. Radiographics 30:961–981
doi: 10.1148/rg.304095755
Koeter S, Diks MJ, Anderson PG, Wymenga AB (2007) A modified tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellar maltracking: results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:180–185
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B2.18358
Dornacher D, Trubrich A, Guelke J, Reichel H, Kappe T (2017) Evaluation of a modified knee rotation angle in MRI scans with and without trochlear dysplasia: a parameter independent of knee size and trochlear morphology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2447–2452
doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3919-7
Prakash J, Seon JK, Ahn HW, Cho KJ, Im CJ, Song EK (2018) Factors affecting tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in recurrent patellar dislocation. Clin Orthop Surg 10:420–426
doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.4.420
Tensho K, Akaoka Y, Shimodaira H, Takanashi S, Ikegami S, Kato H et al (2015) What components comprise the measurement of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in a patellar dislocation population? J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1441–1448
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01313
Lippacher S, Dejour D, Elsharkawi M, Dornacher D, Ring C, Dreyhaupt J et al (2012) Observer agreement on the Dejour trochlear dysplasia classification: a comparison of true lateral radiographs and axial magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med 40:837–843
doi: 10.1177/0363546511433028
Schoettle PB, Zanetti M, Seifert B, Pfirrmann CW, Fucentese SF, Romero J (2006) The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. Knee 13:26–31
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2005.06.003
Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT (1987) Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1169–1176
doi: 10.2106/00004623-198769080-00010
Goutallier D, Van Driessche S, Manicom O, Sariali E, Bernageau J, Radier C (2006) Influence of lower-limb torsion on long-term outcomes of tibial valgus osteotomy for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2439–2447
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01130
Duerr RA, Chauhan A, Frank DA, DeMeo PJ, Akhavan S (2016) An algorithm for diagnosing and treating primary and recurrent patellar instability. JBJS Rev. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00102
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00102
pubmed: 27760074
Camathias C, Pagenstert G, Stutz U, Barg A, Muller-Gerbl M, Nowakowski AM (2016) The effect of knee flexion and rotation on the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2811–2817
doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3508-9
Hamai S, Moro-oka TA, Miura H, Shimoto T, Higaki H, Fregly BJ et al (2009) Knee kinematics in medial osteoarthritis during in vivo weight-bearing activities. J Orthop Res 27:1555–1561
doi: 10.1002/jor.20928
Nagao N, Tachibana T, Mizuno K (1998) The rotational angle in osteoarthritic knees. Int Orthop 22:282–287
doi: 10.1007/s002640050261
Piazza SJ, Cavanagh PR (2000) Measurement of the screw-home motion of the knee is sensitive to errors in axis alignment. J Biomech 33:1029–1034
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00056-7