Donor site morbidity after sural nerve grafting: A systematic review.


Journal

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
ISSN: 1878-0539
Titre abrégé: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101264239

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 25 04 2020
revised: 31 12 2020
accepted: 13 03 2021
pubmed: 15 5 2021
medline: 30 11 2021
entrez: 14 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Understanding the morbidity of sural nerve harvest is important when counselling patients regarding nerve grafts. Existing data consist of small studies with varying degrees of follow-up and a wide range of reported donor site outcomes. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature and pool the current data for postoperative outcomes after sural nerve graft harvest. A systematic review of literature was conducted to identify studies that examined donor site outcomes of sural nerve graft harvests. Five-hundred and fourteen studies were identified through a literature search, and nine studies met inclusion criteria. There were 240 patients who underwent sural nerve grafts. The most common methods for sensory evaluation were patient survey (44.4%) and Semmes-Weinstein evaluation (33.3%). Five studies reported surface areas of sensory loss, and this generally decreased over time after sural nerve grafting. Overall, 87.2% of patients (n = 190) reported sensory loss, 25.6% (n = 42) of patients reported pain, 22.2% (n = 28) of patients reported cold sensitivity, and 10% (n = 20) of patients reported functional impairment at follow-up. When the proximal sural nerve was spared during harvest, the extent of sensory loss and pain were less than harvest at the popliteal fossa (87.4% vs 95.7%, p = 0.0407 and 9.1% vs 35.5%, p = 0.0004, respectively). In this study, we present the extent of sensory loss and rates of pain, cold sensitivity, and functional impairment after sural nerve harvest. These data should be discussed prior to surgery in order for patients and surgeons to make an informed decision.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Understanding the morbidity of sural nerve harvest is important when counselling patients regarding nerve grafts. Existing data consist of small studies with varying degrees of follow-up and a wide range of reported donor site outcomes. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature and pool the current data for postoperative outcomes after sural nerve graft harvest.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic review of literature was conducted to identify studies that examined donor site outcomes of sural nerve graft harvests.
RESULTS RESULTS
Five-hundred and fourteen studies were identified through a literature search, and nine studies met inclusion criteria. There were 240 patients who underwent sural nerve grafts. The most common methods for sensory evaluation were patient survey (44.4%) and Semmes-Weinstein evaluation (33.3%). Five studies reported surface areas of sensory loss, and this generally decreased over time after sural nerve grafting. Overall, 87.2% of patients (n = 190) reported sensory loss, 25.6% (n = 42) of patients reported pain, 22.2% (n = 28) of patients reported cold sensitivity, and 10% (n = 20) of patients reported functional impairment at follow-up. When the proximal sural nerve was spared during harvest, the extent of sensory loss and pain were less than harvest at the popliteal fossa (87.4% vs 95.7%, p = 0.0407 and 9.1% vs 35.5%, p = 0.0004, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we present the extent of sensory loss and rates of pain, cold sensitivity, and functional impairment after sural nerve harvest. These data should be discussed prior to surgery in order for patients and surgeons to make an informed decision.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33985927
pii: S1748-6815(21)00201-1
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.096
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3055-3060

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Ravinder Bamba (R)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 232, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.

Scott N Loewenstein (SN)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 232, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.

Joshua M Adkinson (JM)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 232, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States. Electronic address: jadkinso@iu.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH