Evaluation of split-filter dual-energy CT for characterization of urinary stones.
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2021
01 Nov 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
15
5
2021
medline:
30
10
2021
entrez:
14
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from calcium urinary stones in dual-energy split filter Thirty-four urinary stones (volume 89.0 ± 77.4 mm³; 17 calcium stones, 17 uric acid stones) were scanned in a water-filled phantom using a split-filter equipped CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Edge, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) in split-filter mode at 120 kVp and sequential-spiral mode at 80 and 140 kVp. Additional DE scans were acquired at 80 and 140 kVp (tin filter) with a dual-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition FLASH, Siemens Healthineers). Scans were performed with a CTDIvol of 7.3 mGy in all protocols. Urinary stone categorization was based on dual energy ratio (DER) using an automated 3D segmentation. As reference standard, infrared spectroscopy was used to determine urinary stone composition. All three DECT techniques significantly differentiated between uric acid and calcium stones by attenuation values and DERs ( Split-filter DECT, sequential-spiral DECT and dual-source DECT all allow for the acquisition of DER to classify urinary stones. Split-filter DECT enables the differentiation between uric acid and calcium stones despite decreased spectral separation when compared with dual-source and dual-spiral DECT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33989046
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210084
pmc: PMC8553179
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20210084Références
World J Urol. 2016 Sep;34(9):1297-302
pubmed: 26749082
Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):813-20
pubmed: 19244048
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 May;46(5):2079-2089
pubmed: 33159558
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Mar;44(3):1027-1032
pubmed: 30259102
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct;85(10):1843-1848
pubmed: 27666626
Clin Radiol. 2017 Jun;72(6):490-496
pubmed: 28258740
Med Phys. 2017 Jan;44(1):171-179
pubmed: 28070917
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jun;17(6):1510-7
pubmed: 17151859
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Mar;190(3):720-8
pubmed: 18287444
Eur Radiol. 2019 Aug;29(8):4207-4214
pubmed: 30338365
Invest Radiol. 2010 Jan;45(1):1-6
pubmed: 19996763
Acad Radiol. 2007 Dec;14(12):1441-7
pubmed: 18035274
Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):394-401
pubmed: 20807846
Invest Radiol. 2008 Feb;43(2):112-9
pubmed: 18197063
Int J Urol. 2019 Jan;26(1):96-101
pubmed: 30308705
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82
pubmed: 26344917
Acad Radiol. 2016 Aug;23(8):969-76
pubmed: 27212607
Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):402-9
pubmed: 20807847
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):496-500
pubmed: 26183068
Invest Radiol. 2010 Jul;45(7):393-8
pubmed: 20440214
Med Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;102(2):265-277
pubmed: 29406057
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):224-234
pubmed: 29185902
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2001 Nov;30(6):568-72
pubmed: 11817281
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):W172-6
pubmed: 26204304
BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):785-789
pubmed: 27128735
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019 Mar/Apr;43(2):214-219
pubmed: 30540620