Outcome of early stage Merkel carcinoma treated by exclusive radiation: a study of 53 patients.
Exclusive radiation
Merkel cell carcinoma
Skin cancer
Journal
Radiation oncology (London, England)
ISSN: 1748-717X
Titre abrégé: Radiat Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 May 2021
14 May 2021
Historique:
received:
23
10
2020
accepted:
29
04
2021
entrez:
15
5
2021
pubmed:
16
5
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early stage Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive primary skin cancer. The standard of care for MCC is broad excision and adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). However, for some patients, anesthesia is contraindicated, while others run the risk of serious aesthetic sequelae. In such cases, exclusive radiotherapy is an interesting alternative to surgery. Though limited data is available, this study evaluates exclusive radiotherapy for MCC, using data from the largest retrospective study to date. All patients who were followed in our center between 1989 and 2019 for histologically proven early stage MCC were included in the study. They were treated either by surgery with a 2-cm clear margin followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or by exclusive RT. Survival rates with adjuvant and exclusive EBRT were analyzed using Cox model and Fine and Gray model depending on the type of survival. p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Eighty-four patients treated for MCC were included. Fifty-three of them (63.1%) were treated by exclusive RT, and 31 (36.9%) had surgical excision followed by adjuvant RT. Local relapse rate was 13.7% (95% CI 8.0-43.7) in the RT monotherapy group (group A) and 25.8% (95% CI 10.3-56.2) in the surgery + RT group (group B) (p = 0.42). No statistical difference was found for nodal relapse (p = 0.81), metastatic relapse (p = 0.10), disease free survival (p = 0.83) or overall survival (p = 0.98). Our study suggests that exclusive radiotherapy for early Merkel cell carcinoma leads to a similar oncological outcome as combined treatment, with fewer aesthetic sequelae. The approach is interesting for elderly patients with comorbidities or patients for whom surgery would cause significant functional or aesthetic sequelae.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33990201
doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01815-4
pii: 10.1186/s13014-021-01815-4
pmc: PMC8120723
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
90Références
Arch Dermatol. 2003 Dec;139(12):1587-90
pubmed: 14676075
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jan;71:53-69
pubmed: 27984768
Anesthesiology. 2007 Mar;106(3):572-90
pubmed: 17325517
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3929-3934
pubmed: 28174236
Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Sep;86(9):885-93
pubmed: 21878601
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Nov 1;78(3):703-9
pubmed: 19939581
Drugs Aging. 2020 Jan;37(1):1-9
pubmed: 31598909
Int J Dermatol. 2015 Aug;54(8):e287-93
pubmed: 25772131
Biometrics. 1978 Dec;34(4):541-54
pubmed: 373811
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jun;16(6):742-774
pubmed: 29891526
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Sep;26(3):327-43
pubmed: 23040284
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Mar;53(3):424-9
pubmed: 15743284
J Med Life. 2018 Jul-Sep;11(3):231-237
pubmed: 30364615
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62
pubmed: 23395245
Anesthesiology. 2009 Apr;110(4):759-65
pubmed: 19322941
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Mar;68(3):425-32
pubmed: 23200197
Lancet. 2002 Feb 9;359(9305):497-8
pubmed: 11853800
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jan 21;2018:2178469
pubmed: 29581964
Eur J Dermatol. 2012 May-Jun;22(3):375-9
pubmed: 22498750
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(11):3401-5
pubmed: 25001091
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1401-7
pubmed: 7635780
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 Apr;130(4):393-7
pubmed: 26875509
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Nov;65(5):983-90
pubmed: 21641081
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Nov;63(5):751-61
pubmed: 20646783
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jul;6(14):282
pubmed: 30105232