The Role of Clips in Preventing Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Polyp Resection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.


Journal

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
ISSN: 1542-7714
Titre abrégé: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2022
Historique:
received: 22 04 2021
accepted: 02 05 2021
pubmed: 16 5 2021
medline: 16 3 2022
entrez: 15 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Nonpedunculated colorectal polyps are normally endoscopically removed to prevent neoplastic progression. Delayed bleeding is the most common major adverse event. Clipping the resection defect has been suggested to reduce delayed bleedings. Our aim was to determine if prophylactic clipping reduces delayed bleedings and to analyze the contribution of polyp characteristics, extent of defect closure, and antithrombotic use. An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed. Studies on prophylactic clipping in nonpedunculated colorectal polyps were selected from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database (last selection, April 2020). Authors were invited to share original study data. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding ≤30 days. Multivariable mixed models were used to determine the efficacy of prophylactic clipping in various subgroups adjusted for confounders. Data of 5380 patients with 8948 resected polyps were included from 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective, and 8 retrospective studies. Prophylactic clipping reduced delayed bleeding in proximal polyps ≥20 mm (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.88; number needed to treat = 32), especially with antithrombotics (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-0.99; number needed to treat = 23; subgroup of anticoagulants/double platelet inhibitors: n = 226; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-1.01; number needed to treat = 12). Prophylactic clipping did not benefit distal polyps ≥20 mm with antithrombotics (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.79-2.52). Prophylactic clipping reduces delayed bleeding after resection of nonpedunculated, proximal colorectal polyps ≥20 mm, especially in patients using antithrombotics. No benefit was found for distal polyps. Based on this study, patients can be identified who may benefit from prophylactic clipping. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020104317.).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
Nonpedunculated colorectal polyps are normally endoscopically removed to prevent neoplastic progression. Delayed bleeding is the most common major adverse event. Clipping the resection defect has been suggested to reduce delayed bleedings. Our aim was to determine if prophylactic clipping reduces delayed bleedings and to analyze the contribution of polyp characteristics, extent of defect closure, and antithrombotic use.
METHODS
An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed. Studies on prophylactic clipping in nonpedunculated colorectal polyps were selected from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database (last selection, April 2020). Authors were invited to share original study data. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding ≤30 days. Multivariable mixed models were used to determine the efficacy of prophylactic clipping in various subgroups adjusted for confounders.
RESULTS
Data of 5380 patients with 8948 resected polyps were included from 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective, and 8 retrospective studies. Prophylactic clipping reduced delayed bleeding in proximal polyps ≥20 mm (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.88; number needed to treat = 32), especially with antithrombotics (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-0.99; number needed to treat = 23; subgroup of anticoagulants/double platelet inhibitors: n = 226; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-1.01; number needed to treat = 12). Prophylactic clipping did not benefit distal polyps ≥20 mm with antithrombotics (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.79-2.52).
CONCLUSIONS
Prophylactic clipping reduces delayed bleeding after resection of nonpedunculated, proximal colorectal polyps ≥20 mm, especially in patients using antithrombotics. No benefit was found for distal polyps. Based on this study, patients can be identified who may benefit from prophylactic clipping. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020104317.).

Identifiants

pubmed: 33991691
pii: S1542-3565(21)00515-2
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

362-371.e23

Investigateurs

Douglas K Rex (DK)
Brian S Lim (BS)
Karl K Kwok (KK)
Kazutomo Togashi (K)
Romain Coriat (R)
Sarah B Umar (SB)
Chun-Wei Chen (CW)
Jochim Terhaar Sive Droste (J)
Ruud Schrauwen (R)
Gijs Kemper (G)

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ayla S Turan (AS)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: aylaturan@radboudumc.nl.

Heiko Pohl (H)

Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, White River Junction, Vermont.

Mio Matsumoto (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Sapporo, Japan.

Brian S Lee (BS)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California.

Masato Aizawa (M)

Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan.

Federico Desideri (F)

Digestive and Liver Disease Department, Endoscopy Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Gastroenterology Department, San Maurizio Hospital, Bolzano, Italy.

Eduardo Albéniz (E)

Department of Gastroenterology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed Biomedical Research Center, UPNA, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.

Gottumukkala S Raju (GS)

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Daniel Luba (D)

Monterey Bay Gastroenterology Consultants, Monterey, California.

Maximilien Barret (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France.

Suryakanth R Gurudu (SR)

Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.

Francisco C Ramirez (FC)

Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.

Wey-Ran Lin (WR)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Femke Atsma (F)

Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Peter D Siersema (PD)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Erwin J M van Geenen (EJM)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH