The Flexor Pollicis Longus Reflex: Interrater and Intrarater Reliability in Comparison With Established Muscle Stretch Reflexes.
Journal
American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
ISSN: 1537-7385
Titre abrégé: Am J Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8803677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2021
01 06 2021
Historique:
entrez:
17
5
2021
pubmed:
18
5
2021
medline:
28
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the interrater reliability and intrarater reliability of the flexor pollicis longus muscle stretch reflex (FPLR) and compare it with clinically established reflexes. A total of 71 healthy volunteers participated. The FPLR, biceps reflex, brachioradialis reflex, and patellar tendon reflex of each participant were tested bilaterally and rated by eight examiners (four experienced, four inexperienced). For intrarater reliability evaluation, five examiners rated the reflexes of four volunteers at four different points in time. Analysis of the interrater reliability with Gwet's AC1 demonstrated almost perfect agreement for FPLR (Gwet's AC1 = 0.90), biceps reflex (Gwet's AC1 = 0.90), and patellar tendon reflex (Gwet's AC1 = 0.95) when using binary data (reflex present vs. absent). Only fair agreement was found for the brachioradialis reflex (Gwet's AC1 = 0.56). Experienced raters had a higher agreement than inexperienced raters did when rating the biceps reflex and the patellar tendon reflex. The intrarater reliability was almost perfect for the patellar tendon reflex (Gwet's AC1 = 0.94), followed by the FPLR (Gwet's AC1 = 0.83) with substantial agreement and the biceps reflex (Gwet's AC1 = 0.57) with moderate agreement. The FPLR is a reliable diagnostic neuromuscular test and may therefore be useful in the clinical examination for C8/T1 nerve root lesions or pathologies of the interosseous anterior nerve. Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME. Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Elicit the flexor pollicis longus muscle stretch reflex; (2) Discuss the disadvantage of kappa statistics in assessing the interrater reliability when the prevalence of the studied trait is very high or very low; and (3) Name the spinal nerves involved in the innervation of the flexor pollicis longus muscle. Advanced. The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33998607
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001731
pii: 00002060-202106000-00004
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
539-545Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.
Références
Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al.: Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:403–8
Boes CJ: The history of examination of reflexes. J Neurol 2014;261:2264–74
Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, et al.: Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. Brain 1994;117:325–35
Kuijper B, Tans JT, Schimsheimer RJ, et al.: Degenerative cervical radiculopathy: diagnosis and conservative treatment. A review. Eur J Neurol 2009;16:15–20
Levin KH: Electrodiagnostic approach to the patient with suspected radiculopathy. Neurol Clin 2002;20:397–421
Albers JW, Mitz M, Sulaiman AR, et al.: Letters to the editor. Muscle Nerve 1979;2:503–5
Greathouse DG, Joshi A: Radiculopathy of the eighth cervical nerve. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:811–7
Goldfarb CA, Stern PJ: Low ulnar nerve palsy. J Am Soc Surg Hand 2003;3:14–26
Donner A, Rotondi MA: Sample size requirements for interval estimation of the kappa statistic for interobserver agreement studies with a binary outcome and multiple raters. Int J Biostat 2010;6:Article 31. doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1275
doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1275
Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74
Gwet KL: Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters . Washington, DC, Advanced Analytics, LLC, 2014
Litvan I, Mangone CA, Werden W, et al.: Reliability of the NINDS Myotatic Reflex Scale. Neurology 1996;47:969–72
Ertuglu LA, Karacan I, Yilmaz G, et al.: Standardization of the Jendrassik maneuver in Achilles tendon tap reflex. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2017;3:1–5
Walker HK: Deep Tendon Reflexes , 3rd ed. Boston, Butterworths, 1990. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK396/ . Accessed August 28, 2020
Klein D: Implementing a general framework for assessing interrater agreement in Stata. Stata J 2018;18:871–901
Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB: Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:423–9
Braddom RL: The pronator teres reflex unknown and underrated. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:233
Malanga GA, Campagnolo DI: Clarification of the pronator reflex. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:338–40
Shehab D, Butinar D: Pronator teres reflex: Reliability and normal value. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:328–31
Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, et al.: A comparison of Cohen’s kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: A study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:61
Gwet KL: Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2008;61:29–48
Manschot S, van Passel L, Buskens E, et al.: Mayo and NINDS Scales for Assessment of Tendon Reflexes: Between Observer Agreement and Implications for Communication. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:253–5