Preparing for court testimony.
Child abuse
Children
Court
Pediatric radiologist
Preparation
Testimony
Journal
Pediatric radiology
ISSN: 1432-1998
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0365332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
17
07
2020
accepted:
03
12
2020
revised:
26
10
2020
entrez:
17
5
2021
pubmed:
18
5
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pediatric radiologists are frequently summoned to testify in court regarding the imaging of child abuse. This essay provides guidance on how to prepare for trial and what to expect in court. Preparation is paramount and includes meeting with the attorney and reviewing imaging studies, medical records and pertinent reports in anticipation of questioning in court. We also provide guidance to aid in testimony in court. Legal standards for testimony are discussed herein.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33999250
doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04926-4
pii: 10.1007/s00247-020-04926-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1084-1092Références
Coakley M (2015) Child abuse and the law II: the radiologist in court and fundamental legal issues. In: Kleinman PK (ed) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 645–657
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511862366.037
Hanes M, McAuliff T (1997) Preparation for child abuse litigation: perspectives of the prosecutor and pediatrician. Pediatr Ann 26:288–295
doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19970501-06
Chadwick DL (1990) Preparation for court testimony in child abuse cases. Pediatr Clin N Am 37:955–970
doi: 10.1016/S0031-3955(16)36945-0
Leake HC III, Smith DJ (1977) Preparing for and testifying in a child abuse hearing. Clin Pediatr 16:1057–1063
doi: 10.1177/000992287701601118
Kleinman PK (2015) The radiologist’s response to child abuse. In: Kleinman PK (ed) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 658–664
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511862366.038
Andrew LB (2006) Expert witness testimony: the ethics of being a medical expert witness. Emerg Med Clin N Am 24:715–731
doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2006.05.001
Williams C (2002) The role of the expert witness. Arch Dis Child 87:267–268
doi: 10.1136/adc.87.4.267
Oates A, Halliday K, Offiah AC et al (2019) Shortage of paediatric radiologist acting as an expert witness: position statement from the British Society of Paediatric Radiology (BSPR) National Working Group on imaging in suspected physical abuse (SPA). Clin Radiol 74:496–502
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.016
Moreno JA (2013) What do pediatric healthcare experts really need to know about Daubert and the rules of evidence? Pediatr Radiol 43:135–139
doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2539-3
Narang SK, Melville JD (2014) Legal issues in child maltreatment. Pediatr Clin N Am 61:1049–1058
doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2014.06.016
Choudhary AK, Servaes S, Slovis TL et al (2018) Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatr Radiol 48:1048–1065
doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4149-1
Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) (2016) Traumatic shaking — the role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking: a systematic review SBU assessment report No. 255E. http://www.sbu.se/contentassets/09cc34e7666340a59137ba55d6c55bc9/traumatic_shaking_2016.pdf . Accessed 19 June 2020
Debelle GD, Maguire S, Watts P et al (2017) Abusive head trauma and the triad: a critique on behalf of RCPCH of ‘traumatic shaking: the role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking.’ Arch Dis Child 103:606–601
Saunders D, Raissaki M, Servaes S et al (2017) Throwing the baby out with the bath water — response to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) report on traumatic shaking. Pediatr Radiol 47:1386–1389
doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3932-8
Jenny C (2014) Alternate theories of causation in abusive head trauma: what the science tells us. Pediatr Radiol 44:S543–S547
doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3106-x
Lindberg DM, Dubowitz H, Alexander RC, Reece RM (2019) The “new science” of abusive head trauma. Int J Child Maltreat Res Policy Pract 9:1–16
American Association of Neurological Surgeons (2006) Rules for neurosurgical medical/legal expert opinion. Online document. https://www.aans.org/-/media/Images/AANS/Header/Govenance/AANS_Neurosurgical_Medical-Legal_Expert_Opinion_Services_3-22-2006.ashx?la=en&hash=A537337F65481F7C62EC64287BB007C2162F8E80 . Accessed 19 June 2020
Miller AJ, Narang S, Scribano P (2020) Ethical testimony in cases of suspected child maltreatment: the Ray E. Helfer Society guidelines. Acad Pediatr 20:742–745
doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.02.011
Paul ST, Narang SK, Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management (2017) Expert witness participation in civil and criminal proceedings: policy statement. Pediatrics 139:e20163862
doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3862
Narang SK, Paul SR, Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management (2017) Expert witness participation in civil and criminal proceedings: technical report. Pediatrics 139:e20164122
doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4122
American Medical Association (2017) Medical testimony: code of medical ethics opinion 9.7.1. AMA website. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/medical-testimony . Accessed 19 June 2020
American College of Radiology (2017) ACR practice parameter on the physician expert witness in radiology and radiation oncology. Online document. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/ExpertWitness.pdf?la=en . Accessed 19 June 2020
Pelton RM (2004) Medical societies’ self-policing of unprofessional expert testimony. Annals Health L 13:549–562
Muroff JA, Berlin L (2005) Taming the expert: standards and implications of radiologist expert witness testimony. J Am Coll Radiol 2:418–423
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.08.007
AANS Neurosurgeon (2013) Notice of disciplinary actions: member censure. AANS Neurosurg. http://v1archives.aansneurosurgeon.org/210613/8/3268 . Accessed 16 Nov 2020
Dias MS, Boehmer S, Johnston-Walsh L, Levi BH (2015) Defining ‘reasonable medical certainty’ in court: what does it mean to medical experts in child abuse cases? Child Abuse Negl 50:218–227
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.027
Findley KA, Risinger DM, Barnes PD et al (2019) Feigned consensus: usurping the law in shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma prosecutions. Wis L Rev 1461:1211–1268