Seropositivity in blood donors and pregnant women during the first year of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Stockholm, Sweden.
Adult
Antibodies, Neutralizing
/ blood
Antibodies, Viral
/ blood
Blood Donors
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin G
/ blood
Male
Pandemics
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
/ epidemiology
Prospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
/ immunology
Seroepidemiologic Studies
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
/ immunology
Sweden
/ epidemiology
Young Adult
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Sweden
antibody testing
population immunity
serology
seroprevalence
Journal
Journal of internal medicine
ISSN: 1365-2796
Titre abrégé: J Intern Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8904841
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
revised:
25
03
2021
received:
04
02
2021
accepted:
07
04
2021
pubmed:
20
5
2021
medline:
15
9
2021
entrez:
19
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In Sweden, social restrictions to contain SARS-CoV-2 have primarily relied upon voluntary adherence to a set of recommendations. Strict lockdowns have not been enforced, potentially affecting viral dissemination. To understand the levels of past SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Stockholm population before the start of mass vaccinations, healthy blood donors and pregnant women (n = 5,100) were sampled at random between 14 March 2020 and 28 February 2021. In this cross-sectional prospective study, otherwise-healthy blood donors (n = 2,600) and pregnant women (n = 2,500) were sampled for consecutive weeks (at four intervals) throughout the study period. Sera from all participants and a cohort of historical (negative) controls (n = 595) were screened for IgG responses against stabilized trimers of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein and the smaller receptor-binding domain (RBD). As a complement to standard analytical approaches, a probabilistic (cut-off independent) Bayesian framework that assigns likelihood of past infection was used to analyse data over time. Healthy participant samples were randomly selected from their respective pools through Karolinska University Hospital. The study was carried out in accordance with Swedish Ethical Review Authority: registration number 2020-01807. No participants were symptomatic at sampling, and blood donors were all over the age of 18. No additional metadata were available from the participants. Blood donors and pregnant women showed a similar seroprevalence. After a steep rise at the start of the pandemic, the seroprevalence trajectory increased steadily in approach to the winter second wave of infections, approaching 15% of all individuals surveyed by 13 December 2020. By the end of February 2021, 19% of the population tested seropositive. Notably, 96% of seropositive healthy donors screened (n = 56) developed neutralizing antibody responses at titres comparable to or higher than those observed in clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccination, supporting that mild infection engenders a competent B-cell response. These data indicate that in the first year since the start of community transmission, seropositivity levels in metropolitan in Stockholm had reached approximately one in five persons, providing important baseline seroprevalence information prior to the start of vaccination.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In Sweden, social restrictions to contain SARS-CoV-2 have primarily relied upon voluntary adherence to a set of recommendations. Strict lockdowns have not been enforced, potentially affecting viral dissemination. To understand the levels of past SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Stockholm population before the start of mass vaccinations, healthy blood donors and pregnant women (n = 5,100) were sampled at random between 14 March 2020 and 28 February 2021.
METHODS
In this cross-sectional prospective study, otherwise-healthy blood donors (n = 2,600) and pregnant women (n = 2,500) were sampled for consecutive weeks (at four intervals) throughout the study period. Sera from all participants and a cohort of historical (negative) controls (n = 595) were screened for IgG responses against stabilized trimers of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein and the smaller receptor-binding domain (RBD). As a complement to standard analytical approaches, a probabilistic (cut-off independent) Bayesian framework that assigns likelihood of past infection was used to analyse data over time.
SETTING
Healthy participant samples were randomly selected from their respective pools through Karolinska University Hospital. The study was carried out in accordance with Swedish Ethical Review Authority: registration number 2020-01807.
PARTICIPANTS
No participants were symptomatic at sampling, and blood donors were all over the age of 18. No additional metadata were available from the participants.
RESULTS
Blood donors and pregnant women showed a similar seroprevalence. After a steep rise at the start of the pandemic, the seroprevalence trajectory increased steadily in approach to the winter second wave of infections, approaching 15% of all individuals surveyed by 13 December 2020. By the end of February 2021, 19% of the population tested seropositive. Notably, 96% of seropositive healthy donors screened (n = 56) developed neutralizing antibody responses at titres comparable to or higher than those observed in clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccination, supporting that mild infection engenders a competent B-cell response.
CONCLUSIONS
These data indicate that in the first year since the start of community transmission, seropositivity levels in metropolitan in Stockholm had reached approximately one in five persons, providing important baseline seroprevalence information prior to the start of vaccination.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34008203
doi: 10.1111/joim.13304
pmc: PMC8242905
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Neutralizing
0
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
0
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
666-676Subventions
Organisme : Swedish Research Council
ID : 2017-00968
Organisme : National Institutes of Health, USA
ID : 400 SUM1A44462-02
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00002/4
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council, UK
ID : MC_UP_1302/5
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : WT107881
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Internal Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Publication of The Journal of Internal Medicine.
Références
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;25(10):1868-1877
pubmed: 31423970
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 29;383(18):1724-1734
pubmed: 32871063
Lancet. 2020 Aug 1;396(10247):313-319
pubmed: 32534626
Nat Immunol. 2021 Jan;22(1):25-31
pubmed: 33154590
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 12;11(1):5744
pubmed: 33184284
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):589-593
pubmed: 32785213
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 21;15(10):e0241104
pubmed: 33085715
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):758-759
pubmed: 32330441
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987
pubmed: 32497510
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):812-817
pubmed: 32434946
Trends Immunol. 2009 Jul;30(7):313-8
pubmed: 19540810
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Oct;13(10):1562-4
pubmed: 18258008
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):437-442
pubmed: 32555388
Science. 2020 Mar 13;367(6483):1260-1263
pubmed: 32075877
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):203-212
pubmed: 33091374
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):818-823
pubmed: 32616673
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11):
pubmed: 32826322
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 8;11(1):5064
pubmed: 33033249
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1920-1931
pubmed: 32663912
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Feb;147(2):545-557.e9
pubmed: 33221383
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204
pubmed: 32555424
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 6;11(1):3436
pubmed: 32632160
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Dec;5(12):1598-1607
pubmed: 33106674
Cell. 2020 Aug 20;182(4):812-827.e19
pubmed: 32697968
Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1691-1693
pubmed: 32929268
Sci Immunol. 2020 Dec 7;5(54):
pubmed: 33288645
Science. 2020 Nov 27;370(6520):
pubmed: 32994364
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 11;384(6):533-540
pubmed: 33369366
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jul;146(1):35-43
pubmed: 32479758
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Nov 14;10(467):
pubmed: 30429354
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7819):115-119
pubmed: 32454513
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jun;25(24):
pubmed: 32583766
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 5;370(23):2211-8
pubmed: 24897084
J Clin Virol. 2006 Feb;35(2):179-84
pubmed: 16112612
Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):452-455
pubmed: 33515491
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7851):639-644
pubmed: 33461210
Science. 2020 Dec 4;370(6521):1227-1230
pubmed: 33115920
Science. 2021 Jan 15;371(6526):288-292
pubmed: 33293339
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jul;25(28):
pubmed: 32700672
Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529):
pubmed: 33408181
Euro Surveill. 2021 Feb;26(5):
pubmed: 33541486
J Intern Med. 2021 Sep;290(3):666-676
pubmed: 34008203
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1454-1460
pubmed: 32255183
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 4;11(1):4420
pubmed: 32887876
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7844):146-150
pubmed: 33142304
Cell Host Microbe. 2021 Jun 9;29(6):917-929.e4
pubmed: 33984285
J Clin Virol. 2021 Mar;136:104754
pubmed: 33601153
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):3063-3066
pubmed: 32737790
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005 Nov;12(11):1317-21
pubmed: 16275947
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):
pubmed: 33050983
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Nov;12(11):1638-43
pubmed: 17283611
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):331-340
pubmed: 33228974
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 22;12(1):1813
pubmed: 33753738
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160
pubmed: 32559451
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 10;383(11):1085-1087
pubmed: 32706954
J Biol Rhythms. 2021 Feb;36(1):35-54
pubmed: 33491541
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):535-544
pubmed: 32645347