Be Part of the Conversation: Audiology Messaging During a Hearing Screening.


Journal

Ear and hearing
ISSN: 1538-4667
Titre abrégé: Ear Hear
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8005585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 20 5 2021
medline: 16 4 2022
entrez: 19 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The moment patients learn the results from a hearing assessment can be a critical juncture on their journey to rehabilitation. Message framing (e.g., the positive or negative manner in which information is presented) has been explored in a wide range of health contexts as a method for shaping patients' decision-making. This study investigated whether attitudes toward hearing loss treatment varied as a function of how messages about treatment were framed, and whether such attitudes differed as a function of participants being led to believe they had failed a hearing screening. Sixty-four participants (18 to 39 years of age) took the Hearing in Noise Test. In the sound booth, participants saw a poster bearing either a gain-framed or loss-framed message about hearing loss treatment. During the test, half the participants were interrupted by the researcher who stated that their performance appeared to suggest a hearing loss, with the caveat that it might be due to an equipment malfunction. While the researcher investigated the problem, the participants completed an 11-item questionnaire asking about their attitudes toward help seeking for hearing loss. Participants in the control group completed the same questionnaire with no interruption. Statistical analyses revealed no significant interaction effect between message type and experimenter feedback condition, though a significant main effect was present for message type. Post hoc testing showed medium to large effect sizes as a function of message type on five of the 11-questionnaire items. These data indicated that participants were more likely to endorse health-positive responses (i.e., greater interest in hearing treatment) when exposed to the gain-framed message than the loss-framed message. The greater likelihood of health-positive responses in the presence of the gain-framed message suggests that this framing strategy may have a positive influence on attitudes toward hearing health behaviors among individuals under 40 years of age with no history of hearing loss.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34010246
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001056
pii: 00003446-202111000-00018
pmc: PMC8542081
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1680-1686

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Amieva H., Ouvrard C., Giulioli C., Meillon C., Rullier L., Dartigues J. F. (Self-reported hearing loss, hearing aids, and cognitive decline in elderly adults: A 25-year study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2015). 63, 2099–2104.
Apanovitch A. M., McCarthy D., Salovey P. (Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychol, 2003). 22, 60–67.
Banks S. M., Salovey P., Greener S., Rothman A. J., Moyer A., Beauvais J., Epel E. (The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychol, 1995). 14, 178–184.
Cohen J. (Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 1988). 2nd edErlbaum.
de Bruijn G. J., Spaans P., Jansen B., van’t Riet J. (Testing the effects of a message framing intervention on intentions towards hearing loss prevention in adolescents. Health Educ Res, 2016). 31, 161–170.
Detweiler J. B., Bedell B. T., Salovey P., Pronin E., Rothman A. J. (Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychol, 1999). 18, 189–196.
Eyal T., Liberman N., Trope Y. (Wänke M. (Ed.), Psychological distance and consumer behavior: A construal level theory perspective. In The Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior (pp. 2009). Psychology Press.61–83).
Gallagher K. M., Updegraff J. A., Rothman A. J., Sims L. (Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychol, 2011). 30, 145–152.
Gallagher K. M., Updegraff J. A. (Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med, 2012). 43, 101–116.
Hartley D., Rochtchina E., Newall P., Golding M., Mitchell P. (Use of hearing AIDS and assistive listening devices in an older Australian population. J Am Acad Audiol, 2010). 21, 642–653.
Hodgetts B., Ostevik A., Aalto D., Cummine J. (Don’t fade into the background: A randomized trial exploring the effects of message framing in audiology. Can J Speech Pathol Audiol, 2017). 41, 175–202.
Jansen T., Rademakers J., Waverijn G., Verheij R., Osborne R., Heijmans M. (The role of health literacy in explaining the association between educational attainment and the use of out-of-hours primary care services in chronically ill people: A survey study. BMC Health Serv Res, 2018). 18, 394.
Jenstad L., Moon J. (Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to hearing aid uptake in older adults. Audiol Res, 2011). 1, e25.
Kahneman D., Tversky A. (Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979). 47, 263–291.
Lin F. R., Yaffe K., Xia J., Xue Q. L., Harris T. B., Purchase-Helzner E., Satterfield S., Ayonayon H. N., Ferrucci L., Simonsick E. M.; Health ABC Study Group. (Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med, 2013). 173, 293–299.
Livingston G., Sommerlad A., Orgeta V., Costafreda S. G., Huntley J., Ames D., Ballard C., Banerjee S., Burns A., Cohen-Mansfield J., Cooper C., Fox N., Gitlin L. N., Howard R., Kales H. C., Larson E. B., Ritchie K., Rockwood K., Sampson E. L., Samus Q., et al.Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet, 2017). 390, 2673–2734.
Maheswaran D., Meyers-Levy J. (The influence of message framing and issue involvement. J Mark Res, 1990). 27, 361–367.
McCormack A., Fortnum H. (Why do people fitted with hearing aids not wear them? Int J Audiol, 2013). 52, 360–368.
Meade A. W., Craig S. B. (Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychol Methods, 2012). 17, 437–455.
Millar M. G., Millar K. U. (Promoting safe driving behaviors: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. J Appl Soc Psychol, 2000). 30, 853–866.
Nan X., Xie B., Madden K. (Acceptability of the H1N1 vaccine among older adults: The interplay of message framing and perceived vaccine safety and efficacy. Health Commun, 2012). 27, 559–568.
Nilsson M., Soli S. D., Sullivan J. A. (Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 1994). 95, 1085–1099.
Öberg M., Marcusson J., Nägga K., Wressle E. (Hearing difficulties, uptake, and outcomes of hearing aids in people 85 years of age. Int J Audiol, 2012). 51, 108–115.
O’Keefe D. J., Jensen J. D. (The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. J Health Commun, 2007). 12, 623–644.
Orji A., Kamenov K., Dirac M., Davis A., Chadha S., Vos T. (Global and regional needs, unmet needs and access to hearing aids. Int J Audiol, 2020). 59, 166–172.
Rothman A. J., Salovey P. (Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychol Bull, 1997). 121, 3–19.
Saunders G. H., Dann S. M., Griest S. E., Frederick M. T. (Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards hearing loss prevention. Int J Audiol, 2014). 53, 209–218.
Schneider T. R., Salovey P., Pallonen U., Mundorf N., Smith N. F., Steward W. T. (Visual and auditory message framing effects on tobacco smoking. J Appl Soci Psychol, 2001). 31, 667–682.
Shamaskin A. M., Mikels J. A., Reed A. E. (Getting the message across: Age differences in the positive and negative framing of health care messages. Psychol Aging, 2010). 25, 746–751.
Toll B. A., Salovey P., O’Malley S. S., Mazure C. M., Latimer A., McKee S. A. (Message framing for smoking cessation: The interaction of risk perceptions and gender. Nicotine Tob Res, 2008). 10, 195–200.
Trope Y., Liberman N. (Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2000). 79, 876–889.
Trope Y., Liberman N. (Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev, 2010). 117, 440–463.
Wallhagen M. I. (The stigma of hearing loss. Gerontologist, 2010). 50, 66–75.

Auteurs

Craig Richard St Jean (CR)

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Jacqueline Cummine (J)

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Gurjit Singh (G)

Phonak Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

William E Hodgetts (WE)

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Institute for Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH