Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of oral rimegepant versus placebo, erenumab, and galcanezumab examining monthly migraine days and health-related quality of life in the treatment of migraine.
Administration, Oral
Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Migraine Disorders
/ drug therapy
Piperidines
/ administration & dosage
Placebos
Pyridines
/ administration & dosage
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
health-related quality of life
matching-adjusted indirect comparison
migraine
monthly migraine days
Journal
Headache
ISSN: 1526-4610
Titre abrégé: Headache
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985091R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
revised:
09
03
2021
received:
01
12
2020
accepted:
01
04
2021
pubmed:
23
5
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
22
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rimegepant is an orally administered small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, with demonstrated efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. Recent estimates from a single-arm trial (BHV3000-201) have also shown evidence of long-term preventive effects in monthly migraine days (MMDs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to compare MMDs and HRQoL data for oral rimegepant to those obtained in placebo-controlled trials for injectable anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) galcanezumab and erenumab. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were conducted using rimegepant subject-level data and published aggregate-level results from mAb trials. Rimegepant baseline characteristics were matched to the pooled subject characteristics from EVOLVE-I/II (galcanezumab vs. placebo; n = 1773) and STRIVE (ereumab vs. placebo; n = 955) by reweighting the rimegepant subjects to more closely match the distributions observed in these trials. To align with inclusion criteria of the mAb trials, only the subset of rimegepant subjects with a history of 4-14 MMDs were included (n = 257). Weighted mean differences were used to calculate adjusted change in MMDs, Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS) score, and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2 (MSQv2) scores from baseline to week 12. When matched to the EVOLVE trials, rimegepant was superior to placebo with a mean difference in MMD change from baseline [95% confidence interval] of -1.16 [-1.80, -0.52] and was not statistically significantly different from galcanezumab 0.59 [-0.13, 1.32]. When matched to the STRIVE trial, rimegepant was superior to placebo -1.59 [-2.15, -1.03] and was not statistically significantly different from erenumab -0.06 [-0.61, 0.50]. Rimegepant showed superior MIDAS and MSQv2 results compared with placebo in both EVOLVE trials and in the STRIVE trial, no statistically significant differences from galcanezumab and erenumab regarding MIDAS, and favorable results compared with erenumab across all MSQv2 domains, while being generally similar to galcanezumab across all MSQv2 domains. When adjustments were made to reflect baseline characteristics in published literature, supporting data from BHV3000-201 suggest that rimegepant every other day is an effective therapy in reducing disability and MMDs and enhancing migraine-specific HRQoL. These data support the preventive benefit observed in randomized trials of rimegepant and further validate its efficacy for both acute and preventive treatment of migraine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34021585
doi: 10.1111/head.14128
pmc: PMC8361942
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Piperidines
0
Placebos
0
Pyridines
0
rimegepant sulfate
1383NM3Q0H
galcanezumab
55KHL3P693
erenumab
I5I8VB78VT
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide
JHB2QIZ69Z
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
906-915Informations de copyright
© 2021 American Headache Society.
Références
JAMA. 2019 Nov 19;322(19):1887-1898
pubmed: 31742631
J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Jan;53(1):74-81
pubmed: 21187794
Neurology. 2009 Feb 3;72(5 Suppl):S3-7
pubmed: 19188564
Cephalalgia. 2020 Mar;40(3):241-254
pubmed: 32075406
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jun;38(7):1374-1386
pubmed: 28920448
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):1080-1088
pubmed: 29813147
Lancet. 2021 Jan 2;397(10268):51-60
pubmed: 33338437
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Sep;18(9):891-902
pubmed: 31174999
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):142-149
pubmed: 31291516
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 5;381(23):2230-2241
pubmed: 31800988
J Headache Pain. 2020 Jun 1;21(1):61
pubmed: 32487102
Headache. 2008 Sep;48(8):1157-68
pubmed: 18808500
Eur Respir J. 2018 Nov 29;52(5):
pubmed: 30309978
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 30;377(22):2123-2132
pubmed: 29171821
Headache. 2020 Oct;60(9):2014-2025
pubmed: 32920850
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):940-7
pubmed: 22999145
Neurology. 2019 Dec 10;93(24):e2224-e2236
pubmed: 31690685
Headache. 2015 Jan;55(1):21-34
pubmed: 25600719
J Headache Pain. 2017 Oct 6;18(1):102
pubmed: 28986900
Headache. 2001 Jul-Aug;41(7):646-57
pubmed: 11554952
Headache. 2019 Jan;59(1):1-18
pubmed: 30536394
Lancet. 2019 Aug 31;394(10200):737-745
pubmed: 31311674
Neurology. 2007 Jan 30;68(5):343-9
pubmed: 17261680
JAMA. 2018 May 15;319(19):1999-2008
pubmed: 29800211
Cephalalgia. 2018 Sep;38(10):1622-1631
pubmed: 30086681
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Sep;19(9):727-737
pubmed: 32822633
J Headache Pain. 2020 Jun 9;21(1):69
pubmed: 32517693
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):954-976
pubmed: 30353868
J Headache Pain. 2018 May 24;19(1):38
pubmed: 29797100
J Headache Pain. 2017 Oct 4;18(1):101
pubmed: 28980171
Headache. 2012 Mar;52(3):409-21
pubmed: 21929662