Within-Couple Associations Between Communication and Relationship Satisfaction Over Time.
communication
couples
longitudinal
relationship satisfaction
Journal
Personality & social psychology bulletin
ISSN: 1552-7433
Titre abrégé: Pers Soc Psychol Bull
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7809042
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
25
5
2021
medline:
18
3
2022
entrez:
24
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Relationship science contends that the quality of couples' communication predicts relationship satisfaction over time. Most studies testing these links have examined between-person associations, yet couple dynamics are also theorized at the within-person level: For a given couple, worsened communication is presumed to predict deteriorations in future relationship satisfaction. We examined within-couple associations between satisfaction and communication in three longitudinal studies. Across studies, there were some lagged within-person links between deviations in negative communication to future changes in satisfaction (and vice versa). But the most robust finding was for concurrent within-person associations between negative communication and satisfaction: At times when couples experienced less negative communication than usual, they were also more satisfied with their relationship than was typical. Positive communication was rarely associated with relationship satisfaction at the within-person level. These findings indicate that within-person changes in negative communication primarily covary with, rather than predict, relationship satisfaction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34027722
doi: 10.1177/01461672211016920
pmc: PMC8915221
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
534-549Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD047564
Pays : United States
Références
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Jun;24(3):289-98
pubmed: 20545402
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Dec;21(4):572-83
pubmed: 18179329
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Sep;34(6):676-686
pubmed: 32077736
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Apr;116(4):582-597
pubmed: 30321045
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Jun;26(3):348-58
pubmed: 22545935
J Marriage Fam. 2016 Jun 1;78(3):680-694
pubmed: 27152050
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):19061-19071
pubmed: 32719123
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Aug;109(2):262-75
pubmed: 26098586
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Jun;25(3):325-35
pubmed: 21553964
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Oct;63(5):797-801
pubmed: 7593873
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):904-17
pubmed: 17059309
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Oct;82(5):879-94
pubmed: 24364798
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):543-50
pubmed: 20954764
Psychol Assess. 2005 Mar;17(1):15-27
pubmed: 15769225
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Dec;42(6):802-11
pubmed: 4436466
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Jun;32(4):445-455
pubmed: 29723003
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989 Feb;57(1):47-52
pubmed: 2487031
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Feb;80(2):237-52
pubmed: 11220443
Child Dev. 2017 Jul;88(4):1186-1206
pubmed: 27878996
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1979 Aug;47(4):743-9
pubmed: 500910
Dev Psychol. 2019 Dec;55(12):2692-2700
pubmed: 31512890
Psychol Methods. 2015 Mar;20(1):102-16
pubmed: 25822208
Psychol Assess. 2001 Mar;13(1):5-35
pubmed: 11281039
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):100-116
pubmed: 34108739
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;96(3):620-39
pubmed: 19254108
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 May;72(5):1075-92
pubmed: 9150586
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981 Aug;49(4):554-67
pubmed: 7264037
Psychol Bull. 1990 Jan;107(1):3-33
pubmed: 2404292
Psychol Bull. 1995 Jul;118(1):3-34
pubmed: 7644604
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Apr;98(4):587-604
pubmed: 20307131