Multi-echo gradient-recalled-echo phase unwrapping using a Nyquist sampled virtual echo train in the presence of high-field gradients.


Journal

Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
revised: 23 04 2021
received: 28 01 2021
accepted: 23 04 2021
pubmed: 25 5 2021
medline: 3 8 2021
entrez: 24 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To develop a spatio-temporal approach to accurately unwrap multi-echo gradient-recalled echo phase in the presence of high-field gradients. Using the virtual echo-based Nyquist sampled (VENyS) algorithm, the temporal unwrapping procedure is modified by introduction of one or more virtual echoes between the first lower and the immediate higher echo, so as to reinstate the Nyquist condition at locations with high-field gradients. An iterative extension of the VENyS algorithm maintains spatial continuity by adjusting the phase rotations to make the neighborhood phase differences less than π. The algorithm is evaluated using simulated data, Gadolinium contrast-doped phantom, and in vivo brain, abdomen, and chest data sets acquired at 3 T and 9.4 T. The unwrapping performance is compared with the standard temporal unwrapping algorithm used in the morphology-enabled dipole inversion-QSM pipeline as a benchmark for validation. Quantitative evaluation using numerical phantom showed significant reduction in unwrapping errors in regions of large field gradients, and the unwrapped phase revealed an exact match with the linear concentration profile of vials in a gadolinium contrast-doped phantom data acquired at 9.4 T. Without the need for additional spatial unwrapping, the iterative VENyS algorithm was able to generate spatially continuous phase images. Application to in vivo data resulted in better unwrapping performance, especially in regions with large susceptibility changes such as the air/tissue interface. The iterative VENyS algorithm serves as a robust unwrapping method for multi-echo gradient-recalled echo phase in the presence of high-field gradients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34028899
doi: 10.1002/mrm.28841
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2220-2233

Subventions

Organisme : Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB) of India
ID : GRG/2019/002060

Informations de copyright

© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Références

Bilgic B, Pfefferbaum A, Rohlfing T, Sullivan EV, Adalsteinsson E. MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2625-2635.
de Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, et al. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using Bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63:194-206.
Liu T, Liu J, de Rochefort L, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66:777-783.
Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Li TQ, Dodd SJ, Duyn JH. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62:1510-1522.
Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? Neuroimage. 2011;54:2789-2807.
Deistung A, Schweser F, Wiestler B, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping differentiates between blood depositions and calcifications in patients with glioblastoma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57924.
Barhoum S, Rodgers ZB, Langham M, Magland JF, Li C, Wehrli FW. Comparison of MRI methods for measuring whole-brain venous oxygen saturation. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:2122-2128.
Ward PGD, Fan AP, Raniga P, et al. Improved quantification of cerebral vein oxygenation using partial volume correction. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:89.
Wehrli FW, Fan AP, Rodgers ZB, Englund EK, Langham MC. Susceptibility-based time-resolved whole-organ and regional tissue oximetry. NMR Biomed. 2017;30:e3495.
Ma J. Breath-hold water and fat imaging using a dual-echo two-point Dixon technique with an efficient and robust phase-correction algorithm. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:415-419.
Wang Y, Li D, Haacke EM, Brown JJ. A three-point Dixon method for water and fat separation using 2D and 3D gradient-echo techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8:703-710.
Poorman ME, Braškutė I, Bartels LW, Grissom WA. Multi-echo MR thermometry using iterative separation of baseline water and fat images. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81:2385-2398.
Bernstein MA, Ikezaki Y. Comparison of phase-difference and complex-difference processing in phase-contrast MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;1:725-729.
Dagher J, Reese T, Bilgin A. High-resolution, large dynamic range field map estimation. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:105-117.
Itoh K. Analysis of the phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt. 1982;21:2470.
Goldstein RM, Zebker HA, Werner CL. Satellite radar interferometry: two-dimensional phase unwrapping. Radio Sci. 1988;23:713-720.
Robinson S, Schödl H, Trattnig S. A method for unwrapping highly wrapped multi-echo phase images at very high field: UMPIRE. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:80-92.
Windischberger C, Robinson S, Rauscher A, Barth M, Moser E. Robust field map generation using a triple-echo acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:730-734.
Loureiro JR, Himmelbach M, Ethofer T, et al. In-vivo quantitative structural imaging of the human midbrain and the superior colliculus at 9.4 T. Neuroimage. 2018;177:117-128.
Shajan G, Kozlov M, Hoffmann J, Turner R, Scheffler K, Pohmann R. A 16-channel dual-row transmit array in combination with a 31-element receive array for human brain imaging at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:870-879.
Wang Y, Liu T. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:82-101.
Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2560-2568.
Liu T, Wisnieff C, Lou M, Chen W, Spincemaille P, Wang Y. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:467-476.
Kressler B, De Rochefort L, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Jiang Q, Wang Y. Nonlinear regularization for per voxel estimation of magnetic susceptibility distributions from MRI field maps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;29:273-281.
Ghiglia DC, Pritt MD. Two-Dimensional Phase Unwrapping: Theory, Algorithms, and Software. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley InterScience; 1998.
Liu J, Drangova M. Intervention-based multidimensional phase unwrapping using recursive orthogonal referring. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68:1303-1316.
Schofield MA, Zhu Y. Fast phase unwrapping algorithm for interferometric applications. Opt Lett. 2003;28:1194-1196.
Marques J, Bowtell R. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng. 2005;25:65-78.
Eckstein K, Dymerska B, Bachrata B, et al. Computationally efficient combination of multi-channel phase data from multi-echo acquisitions (ASPIRE). Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:2996-3006.
Robinson SD, Bredies K, Khabipova D, Dymerska B, Marques JP, Schweser F. An illustrated comparison of processing methods for MR phase imaging and QSM: combining array coil signals and phase unwrapping. NMR Biomed. 2017;30:e3601.

Auteurs

Sreekanth Madhusoodhanan (S)

Medical Image Computing and Signal Processing Laboratory, Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

Gisela E Hagberg (GE)

High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karl's University and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

Klaus Scheffler (K)

High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karl's University and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

Joseph Suresh Paul (JS)

Medical Image Computing and Signal Processing Laboratory, Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
School of Electronic Systems and Automation, The Kerala University of Digital Sciences Innovation and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

Articles similaires

Humans Ketamine Propofol Pulmonary Atelectasis Female

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature

Classifications MeSH