Measurement-based range evaluation for quality assurance of CBCT-based dose calculations in adaptive proton therapy.


Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
revised: 08 04 2021
received: 17 07 2020
accepted: 10 05 2021
pubmed: 26 5 2021
medline: 19 8 2021
entrez: 25 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The implementation of volumetric in-room imaging for online adaptive radiotherapy makes extensive testing of this image data for treatment planning necessary. Especially for proton beams the higher sensitivity to stopping power properties of the tissue results in more stringent requirements. Current approaches mainly focus on recalculation of the plans on the new image data, lacking experimental verification, and ignoring the impact on the plan re-optimization process. The aim of this study was to use gel and film dosimetry coupled with a three-dimensional (3D) printed head phantom (based on the planning CT of the patient) for 3D range verification of intensity-corrected cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image data for adaptive proton therapy. Single field uniform dose pencil beam scanning proton plans were optimized for three different patients on the patients' planning CT (planCT) and the patients' intensity-corrected CBCT (scCBCT) for the same target volume using the same optimization constraints. The CBCTs were corrected on projection level using the planCT as a prior. The dose optimized on planCT and recalculated on scCBCT was compared in terms of proton range differences (80% distal fall-off, recalculation). Moreover, the dose distribution resulting from recalculation of the scCBCT-optimized plan on the planCT and the original planCT dose distribution were compared (simulation). Finally, the two plans of each patient were irradiated on the corresponding patient-specific 3D printed head phantom using gel dosimetry inserts for one patient and film dosimetry for all three patients. Range differences were extracted from the measured dose distributions. The measured and the simulated range differences were corrected for range differences originating from the initial plans and evaluated. The simulation approach showed high agreement with the standard recalculation approach. The median values of the range differences of these two methods agreed within 0.1 mm and the interquartile ranges (IQRs) within 0.3 mm for all three patients. The range differences of the film measurement were accurately matching with the simulation approach in the film plane. The median values of these range differences deviated less than 0.1 mm and the IQRs less than 0.4 mm. For the full 3D evaluation of the gel range differences, the median value and IQR matched those of the simulation approach within 0.7 and 0.5 mm, respectively. scCBCT- and planCT-based dose distributions were found to have a range agreement better than 3 mm (median and IQR) for all considered scenarios (recalculation, simulation, and measurement). The results of this initial study indicate that an online adaptive proton workflow based on scatter-corrected CBCT image data for head irradiations is feasible. The novel presented measurement- and simulation-based method was shown to be equivalent to the standard literature recalculation approach. Additionally, it has the capability to catch effects of image differences on the treatment plan optimization. This makes the measurement-based approach particularly interesting for quality assurance of CBCT-based online adaptive proton therapy. The observed uncertainties could be kept within those of the registration and positioning. The proposed validation could also be applied for other alternative in-room images, e.g. for MR-based pseudoCTs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34032301
doi: 10.1002/mp.14995
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4148-4159

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Yan D, Vicini F, Wong J, Martinez A. Adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42(1):123-132.
Klüter S. Technical design and concept of a 0.35 T MR-Linac. Clin Transl. Radiat Oncol. 2019;18:98-101.
Lagendijk JJW, Raaymakers BW, Raaijmakers AJE, et al. MRI/linac integration. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:25-29.
Yan D, Georg D. Adaptive radiation therapy. Z Med Phys. 2018;28:173-174.
Lim-Reinders S, Keller BM, Al-Ward S, Sahgal A, Kim A. Online adaptive radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99:994-1003.
Schulze R, Heil U, Groβ D, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:265-273.
Arai K, Kadoya N, Kato T, et al. Feasibility of CBCT-based proton dose calculation using a histogram-matching algorithm in proton beam therapy. Phys Med. 2017;33:68-76.
Hansen DC, Landry G, Kamp F, et al. ScatterNet: a convolutional neural network for cone-beam CT intensity correction. Med Phys. 2018;45:4916-4926.
Kurz C, Dedes G, Resch A, et al. Comparing cone-beam CT intensity correction methods for dose recalculation in adaptive intensity-modulated photon and proton therapy for head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:1651-1657.
Kurz C, Kamp F, Park Y-K, et al. Investigating deformable image registration and scatter correction for CBCT-based dose calculation in adaptive IMPT. Med Phys. 2016;43:5635.
Kurz C, Nijhuis R, Reiner M, et al. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:64.
Landry G, Dedes G, Zöllner C, et al. Phantom based evaluation of CT to CBCT image registration for proton therapy dose recalculation. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:595-613.
Landry G, Hansen D, Kamp F, et al. Corrigendum: Comparing Unet training with three different datasets to correct CBCT images for prostate radiotherapy dose calculations (2019 Phys. Med. Biol 64 035011). Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:89501.
Landry G, Nijhuis R, Dedes G, et al. Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation. Med Phys. 2015;42:1354-1366.
Park Y-K, Sharp GC, Phillips J, Winey BA. Proton dose calculation on scatter-corrected CBCT image: feasibility study for adaptive proton therapy. Med Phys. 2015;42:4449-4459.
Thummerer A, Zaffino P, Meijers A, et al. Comparison of CBCT based synthetic CT methods suitable for proton dose calculations in adaptive proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65:95002.
Veiga C, Alshaikhi J, Amos R, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography and deformable registration-based “dose of the day” calculations for adaptive proton therapy. Int J Part Ther. 2015;2:404-414.
Veiga C, Janssens G, Baudier T, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of CBCT and deformable registration based dose calculation in lung proton therapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2017;3:15003.
Veiga C, Janssens G, Teng C-L, et al. First clinical investigation of cone beam computed tomography and deformable registration for adaptive proton therapy for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95:549-559.
Zhao L, Das IJ. Gafchromic EBT film dosimetry in proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:N291-301.
Hillbrand M, Landry G, Ebert S, et al. Gel dosimetry for three dimensional proton range measurements in anthropomorphic geometries. Z Med Phys. 2019;29:162-172.
Niu T, Sun M, Star-Lack J, Gao H, Fan Q, Zhu L. Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images. Med Phys. 2010;37:5395-5406.
Zöllner C, Rit S, Kurz C, et al. Decomposing a prior-CT-based cone-beam CT projection correction algorithm into scatter and beam hardening components. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;3:49-52.
Makris DN, Pappas EP, Zoros E, et al. Characterization of a novel 3D printed patient specific phantom for quality assurance in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery applications. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:105009.
Pappas E, Seimenis I, Angelopoulos A, et al. Narrow stereotactic beam profile measurements using N-vinylpyrrolidone based polymer gels and magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2001;46:783-797.
van Abbema JK, van Goethem M-J, Mulder J, et al. High accuracy proton relative stopping power measurement. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2018;436:99-106.
Hillbrand M, Georg D. Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity-modulated proton therapy planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11:3219.
Pappas E, Maris T, Angelopoulos A, et al. A new polymer gel for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44:2677-2684.
Maris TG, Damilakis J, Sideri L, et al. Assessment of the skeletal status by MR relaxometry techniques of the lumbar spine: comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50:245-256.
Micke A, Lewis DF, Yu X. Multichannel film dosimetry with nonuniformity correction. Med Phys. 2011;38:2523-2534.
Seroul P, Sarrut D. VV: a viewer for the evaluation of 4D image registration. Midas, 2008; 1-8
Zaffino P, Raudaschl P, Fritscher K, Sharp GC, Spadea MF. Technical Note: plastimatch mabs, an open source tool for automatic image segmentation. Med Phys. 2016;43:5155.
Niebuhr NI, Johnen W, Echner G, et al. The ADAM-pelvis phantom-an anthropomorphic, deformable and multimodal phantom for MRgRT. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:04NT05.

Auteurs

Sebastian Neppl (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 85748, Garching bei München, Germany.

Christopher Kurz (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 85748, Garching bei München, Germany.

Daniel Köpl (D)

Rinecker Proton Therapy Center, 81371, Munich, Germany.

Indra Yohannes (I)

Rinecker Proton Therapy Center, 81371, Munich, Germany.

Moritz Schneider (M)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377, Munich, Germany.

David Bondesson (D)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377, Munich, Germany.

Moritz Rabe (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 85748, Garching bei München, Germany.

Claus Belka (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Olaf Dietrich (O)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Guillaume Landry (G)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 85748, Garching bei München, Germany.

Katia Parodi (K)

Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 85748, Garching bei München, Germany.

Florian Kamp (F)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH