Utilizing a responsive web portal for studying disc tracing agreement in retinal images.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
23
07
2020
accepted:
02
05
2021
entrez:
25
5
2021
pubmed:
26
5
2021
medline:
25
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide whose detection is based on multiple factors, including measuring the cup to disc ratio, retinal nerve fiber layer and visual field defects. Advances in image processing and machine learning have allowed the development of automated approached for segmenting objects from fundus images. However, to build a robust system, a reliable ground truth dataset is required for proper training and validation of the model. In this study, we investigate the level of agreement in properly detecting the retinal disc in fundus images using an online portal built for such purposes. Two Doctors of Optometry independently traced the discs for 159 fundus images obtained from publicly available datasets using a purpose-built online portal. Additionally, we studied the effectiveness of ellipse fitting in handling misalignments in tracing. We measured tracing precision, interobserver variability, and average boundary distance between the results provided by ophthalmologists, and optometrist tracing. We also studied whether ellipse fitting has a positive or negative impact on properly detecting disc boundaries. The overall agreement between the optometrists in terms of locating the disc region in these images was 0.87. However, we found that there was a fair agreement on the disc border with kappa = 0.21. Disagreements were mainly in fundus images obtained from glaucomatous patients. The resulting dataset was deemed to be an acceptable ground truth dataset for training a validation of models for automatic detection of objects in fundus images.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34032798
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251703
pii: PONE-D-20-22689
pmc: PMC8148353
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0251703Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Sep;36(9):1930-1938
pubmed: 28499992
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32435
pubmed: 22427837
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Apr 27;33(22):e152
pubmed: 29805337
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jun 1;57(7):3103-11
pubmed: 27294804
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Jun;30(6):1192-205
pubmed: 21536531
Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90
pubmed: 24974815
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 18;10(2):e0117401
pubmed: 25692287
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019 Dec;78:101657
pubmed: 31675645
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Aug 08;33(43):e239
pubmed: 30344460
Med Image Anal. 2019 May;54:280-296
pubmed: 30959445
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Sep;5(9):e888-e897
pubmed: 28779882
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Sep 21;5(5):6
pubmed: 27668130
Comput Biol Med. 2014 Apr;47:27-35
pubmed: 24530536
Fam Med. 2005 May;37(5):360-3
pubmed: 15883903
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015 Dec;38(4):643-55
pubmed: 26399880
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026