Strengthening Nutrition Interventions in Antenatal Care Services Affects Dietary Intake, Micronutrient Intake, Gestational Weight Gain, and Breastfeeding in Uttar Pradesh, India: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Program Evaluation.
India
breastfeeding
diet quality
interpersonal counseling
maternal nutrition
micronutrient intake
Journal
The Journal of nutrition
ISSN: 1541-6100
Titre abrégé: J Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0404243
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 08 2021
07 08 2021
Historique:
received:
18
11
2020
revised:
19
01
2021
accepted:
16
04
2021
pubmed:
27
5
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
entrez:
26
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Maternal nutrition interventions are inadequately integrated into antenatal care (ANC). Alive & Thrive aimed to strengthen delivery of micronutrient supplements and intensify interpersonal counseling and community mobilization through government ANC services. We compared nutrition-intensified ANC (I-ANC) with standard ANC (S-ANC) on coverage of nutrition interventions and maternal nutrition practices. We used a cluster-randomized design with cross-sectional baseline (2017) and endline (2019) surveys (n ∼660 pregnant and 1800 recently delivered women per survey) and a repeated-measures longitudinal study in 2018-2019 (n = 400). We derived difference-in-difference effect estimates (DIDs) for diet diversity, consumption of micronutrient supplements, weight monitoring, and early breastfeeding practices. Despite substantial secular improvements in service coverage from India's national nutrition program, women in the I-ANC arm received more home visits [DID: 7-14 percentage points (pp)] and counseling on core nutrition messages (DID: 10-23 pp) than in the S-ANC arm. One-third of women got ≥3 home visits and one-fourth received ≥4 ANC check-ups in the I-ANC arm. Improvements were greater in the I-ANC arm than in the S-ANC arm for any receipt and consumption of iron-folic acid (DID: 7.5 pp and 9.5 pp, respectively) and calcium supplements (DID: 14.1 pp and 11.5 pp, respectively). Exclusive breastfeeding improved (DID: 7.5 pp) but early initiation of breastfeeding did not. Maternal food group consumption (∼4 food groups) and probability of adequacy of micronutrients (∼20%) remained low in both arms. Repeated-measures longitudinal analyses showed similar results, with additional impact on consumption of vitamin A-rich foods (10 pp, 11 g/d), other vegetables and fruits (22-29 g/d), and gestational weight gain (0.4 kg). Intensifying nutrition in government ANC services improved maternal nutrition practices even with strong secular trends in service coverage. Dietary diversity, supplement consumption, and breastfeeding practices remained suboptimal. Achieving greater behavior changes will require strengthening the delivery and use of maternal nutrition services integrated into ANC services in the health system. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03378141.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Maternal nutrition interventions are inadequately integrated into antenatal care (ANC). Alive & Thrive aimed to strengthen delivery of micronutrient supplements and intensify interpersonal counseling and community mobilization through government ANC services.
OBJECTIVES
We compared nutrition-intensified ANC (I-ANC) with standard ANC (S-ANC) on coverage of nutrition interventions and maternal nutrition practices.
METHODS
We used a cluster-randomized design with cross-sectional baseline (2017) and endline (2019) surveys (n ∼660 pregnant and 1800 recently delivered women per survey) and a repeated-measures longitudinal study in 2018-2019 (n = 400). We derived difference-in-difference effect estimates (DIDs) for diet diversity, consumption of micronutrient supplements, weight monitoring, and early breastfeeding practices.
RESULTS
Despite substantial secular improvements in service coverage from India's national nutrition program, women in the I-ANC arm received more home visits [DID: 7-14 percentage points (pp)] and counseling on core nutrition messages (DID: 10-23 pp) than in the S-ANC arm. One-third of women got ≥3 home visits and one-fourth received ≥4 ANC check-ups in the I-ANC arm. Improvements were greater in the I-ANC arm than in the S-ANC arm for any receipt and consumption of iron-folic acid (DID: 7.5 pp and 9.5 pp, respectively) and calcium supplements (DID: 14.1 pp and 11.5 pp, respectively). Exclusive breastfeeding improved (DID: 7.5 pp) but early initiation of breastfeeding did not. Maternal food group consumption (∼4 food groups) and probability of adequacy of micronutrients (∼20%) remained low in both arms. Repeated-measures longitudinal analyses showed similar results, with additional impact on consumption of vitamin A-rich foods (10 pp, 11 g/d), other vegetables and fruits (22-29 g/d), and gestational weight gain (0.4 kg).
CONCLUSIONS
Intensifying nutrition in government ANC services improved maternal nutrition practices even with strong secular trends in service coverage. Dietary diversity, supplement consumption, and breastfeeding practices remained suboptimal. Achieving greater behavior changes will require strengthening the delivery and use of maternal nutrition services integrated into ANC services in the health system. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03378141.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34038529
pii: S0022-3166(22)00287-5
doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab131
pmc: PMC8349122
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03378141']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2282-2295Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.
Références
J Nutr. 2010 Nov;140(11):2059S-69S
pubmed: 20881077
Br J Nutr. 2009 Jul;101 Suppl 2:S6-11
pubmed: 19594965
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):452-477
pubmed: 23746776
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 18;16(12):e1002990
pubmed: 31851685
J Nutr. 2020 Apr 1;150(4):945-957
pubmed: 31858128
Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Jul;1(1):e16-25
pubmed: 25103581
J Nutr. 2017 Dec;147(12):2326-2337
pubmed: 29021370
Food Nutr Bull. 2009 Dec;30(4):355-69
pubmed: 20496626
BMJ. 2020 Jan 26;368:l6911
pubmed: 31983682
PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 25;13(10):e1002159
pubmed: 27780198
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;26 Suppl 1:191-204
pubmed: 22742611
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(15):2818-28
pubmed: 27181394
Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):243-60
pubmed: 18207566
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):427-451
pubmed: 23746772
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Oct;15(4):e12839
pubmed: 31066195
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 02;(6):CD000032
pubmed: 26031211
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 19;3(5):e001010
pubmed: 30397516
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Dec;3(12):855-870
pubmed: 31542357
JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315(4):407-8
pubmed: 26813213
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;26 Suppl 1:285-301
pubmed: 22742616
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 12;18(1):281
pubmed: 29650002
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 13;11 Suppl 3:S24
pubmed: 21501442
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1830-1841
pubmed: 29673873
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Mar;19(4):732-42
pubmed: 26022914
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Nov 13;4(12):nzaa169
pubmed: 33313474
Health Policy Plan. 2006 Nov;21(6):459-68
pubmed: 17030551
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1853-1864
pubmed: 29673875
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S20
pubmed: 24564836
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Jul;17(3):e13153
pubmed: 33554434