Poor performance of open incisional biopsy for the microbiological diagnosis of periprosthetic knee joint infection.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 05 2021
26 05 2021
Historique:
received:
16
02
2021
accepted:
10
05
2021
entrez:
27
5
2021
pubmed:
28
5
2021
medline:
30
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The accurate preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be difficult despite the use of a combination of serum and synovial markers. In such inconclusive cases, incisional open biopsy might be considered. This study investigates the usefulness of biopsies in patients with inconclusive diagnostic findings. We retrospectively identified 63 patients who underwent incisional biopsy for chronic PJI in the operation theatre following TKA revision between 2010 and 2018 after inconclusive preoperative diagnostics for PJI. In all cases, 5 independent biopsies were taken. Results from open biopsy for PJI were analyzed for diagnostic accuracy using the intraoperative results from following revision surgery as gold standard. 27 patients (43%) had a positive culture taken during biopsy. 15 cases (24%) met the diagnostic criteria for a chronic PJI. Most common organisms were Coagulase-negative staphylococci (67%) and Cutibacterium acnes (30%). Compared to the findings during revision surgery, biopsies showed a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 77% for PJI. Open incisional biopsy following inconclusive serum- and synovial diagnostics for low grade PJI may be considered for identification of microorganisms. Due to its low sensitivity and moderate specificity found in the present cohort, microbiological analysis should be combined with additional diagnostic markers and histological investigation.Level of Evidence. Retrospective cohort study (Level III).
Identifiants
pubmed: 34040084
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90475-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-90475-1
pmc: PMC8155057
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
10989Références
BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 22;2(1):e000435
pubmed: 22357571
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2663-2668
pubmed: 28456561
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3783-3788
pubmed: 30224099
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201
pubmed: 28573549
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jan 23;4(1):10-13
pubmed: 30800475
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Jul-Aug;135(4):292-6
pubmed: 9381764
Bone Joint J. 2020 Mar;102-B(3):329-335
pubmed: 32114807
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Dec;29(8):1781-1788
pubmed: 31350652
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Apr;46(4):971-988
pubmed: 30683987
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 12;2018:6278012
pubmed: 30112408
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 1;61(3):332-41
pubmed: 25870326
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):521-526
pubmed: 29033158
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3257-3262
pubmed: 29887359
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Sep;11(3):428-438
pubmed: 30062484
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2
pubmed: 29551303
J Infect Public Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;9(4):494-8
pubmed: 26829894
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jun 1;100-B(6):749-754
pubmed: 29855250
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Jul;86(5):688-91
pubmed: 15274264
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Feb;138(2):165-171
pubmed: 29103074
J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Mar;16(1):1-7
pubmed: 24821631
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 May;468(5):1410-7
pubmed: 20131022
Z Orthop Unfall. 2019 Dec;157(6):684-694
pubmed: 31658475
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jul;90(7):874-8
pubmed: 18591595
Bone Joint J. 2019 May;101-B(5):589-595
pubmed: 31038988
Am J Med. 2004 Oct 15;117(8):556-62
pubmed: 15465503
J Bone Jt Infect. 2019 Aug 2;4(4):167-173
pubmed: 31555502
Int Orthop. 2017 Jul;41(7):1355-1359
pubmed: 28091766
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):956-64
pubmed: 22806261
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jul;475(7):1827-1836
pubmed: 28290115