Health Information Seeking Behaviors on Social Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among American Social Networking Site Users: Survey Study.
COVID-19
United States
communication
information seeking
internet
mistrust
public health
social media
survey
usage
web-based health information
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 06 2021
11 06 2021
Historique:
received:
20
04
2021
accepted:
26
05
2021
revised:
26
05
2021
pubmed:
28
5
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
27
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In recent years, medical journals have emphasized the increasingly critical role that social media plays in the dissemination of public health information and disease prevention guidelines. However, platforms such as Facebook and Twitter continue to pose unique challenges for clinical health care providers and public health officials alike. In order to effectively communicate during public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, it is increasingly critical for health care providers and public health officials to understand how patients gather health-related information on the internet and adjudicate the merits of such information. With that goal in mind, we conducted a survey of 1003 US-based adults to better understand how health consumers have used social media to learn and stay informed about the COVID-19 pandemic, the extent to which they have relied on credible scientific information sources, and how they have gone about fact-checking pandemic-related information. A web-based survey was conducted with a sample that was purchased through an industry-leading market research provider. The results were reported with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 3. Participants included 1003 US-based adults (aged ≥18 years). Participants were selected via a stratified quota sampling approach to ensure that the sample was representative of the US population. Balanced quotas were determined (by region of the country) for gender, age, race, and ethnicity. The results showed a heavy reliance on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic; more than three-quarters of respondents (762/1003, 76%) reported that they have relied on social media at least "a little," and 59.2% (594/1003) of respondents indicated that they read information about COVID-19 on social media at least once per week. According to the findings, most social media users (638/1003, 63.6%) were unlikely to fact-check what they see on the internet with a health professional, despite the high levels of mistrust in the accuracy of COVID-19-related information on social media. We also found a greater likelihood of undergoing vaccination among those following more credible scientific sources on social media during the pandemic (χ The findings suggest that health professionals will need to be both strategic and proactive when engaging with health consumers on social media if they hope to counteract the deleterious effects of misinformation and disinformation. Effective training, institutional support, and proactive collaboration can help health professionals adapt to the evolving patterns of health information seeking.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In recent years, medical journals have emphasized the increasingly critical role that social media plays in the dissemination of public health information and disease prevention guidelines. However, platforms such as Facebook and Twitter continue to pose unique challenges for clinical health care providers and public health officials alike. In order to effectively communicate during public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, it is increasingly critical for health care providers and public health officials to understand how patients gather health-related information on the internet and adjudicate the merits of such information.
OBJECTIVE
With that goal in mind, we conducted a survey of 1003 US-based adults to better understand how health consumers have used social media to learn and stay informed about the COVID-19 pandemic, the extent to which they have relied on credible scientific information sources, and how they have gone about fact-checking pandemic-related information.
METHODS
A web-based survey was conducted with a sample that was purchased through an industry-leading market research provider. The results were reported with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 3. Participants included 1003 US-based adults (aged ≥18 years). Participants were selected via a stratified quota sampling approach to ensure that the sample was representative of the US population. Balanced quotas were determined (by region of the country) for gender, age, race, and ethnicity.
RESULTS
The results showed a heavy reliance on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic; more than three-quarters of respondents (762/1003, 76%) reported that they have relied on social media at least "a little," and 59.2% (594/1003) of respondents indicated that they read information about COVID-19 on social media at least once per week. According to the findings, most social media users (638/1003, 63.6%) were unlikely to fact-check what they see on the internet with a health professional, despite the high levels of mistrust in the accuracy of COVID-19-related information on social media. We also found a greater likelihood of undergoing vaccination among those following more credible scientific sources on social media during the pandemic (χ
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest that health professionals will need to be both strategic and proactive when engaging with health consumers on social media if they hope to counteract the deleterious effects of misinformation and disinformation. Effective training, institutional support, and proactive collaboration can help health professionals adapt to the evolving patterns of health information seeking.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34043526
pii: v23i6e29802
doi: 10.2196/29802
pmc: PMC8202660
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e29802Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
©Stephen Neely, Christina Eldredge, Ron Sanders. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 11.06.2021.
Références
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;28(2):172-183
pubmed: 33263357
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):5976-5981
pubmed: 28533396
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2021 Apr 26;:1-15
pubmed: 33936931
Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):99-112
pubmed: 25038200
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 13;22(11):e22205
pubmed: 33048825
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):
pubmed: 33097547
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 May;166:120600
pubmed: 34876758
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 11;23(2):e26570
pubmed: 33523825
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e19684
pubmed: 33006940
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 11;16(2):e13
pubmed: 24518354
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Nov 1;16(11):2586-2593
pubmed: 32693678
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):620-7
pubmed: 23579867
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1621-1629
pubmed: 32783794
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):223-224
pubmed: 33393964
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;27(2):396-403
pubmed: 33395379
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):e23
pubmed: 33406324
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 8;6(4):e21071
pubmed: 32936775
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 28;365(4):289-91
pubmed: 21793742
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2417-2418
pubmed: 30428002
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 30;21(4):561-564
pubmed: 33388000
JAMA. 2020 Feb 4;323(5):411-412
pubmed: 31922532
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 9;16(3):e0248160
pubmed: 33690685
Cureus. 2020 Mar 13;12(3):e7255
pubmed: 32292669
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):311-317
pubmed: 28669661