Hydroxychloroquine in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: rationale and results of an observational study of refractory cases.


Journal

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
ISSN: 1476-4954
Titre abrégé: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101136916

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 29 5 2021
medline: 24 11 2022
entrez: 28 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The current recommended therapy of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a long-term anticoagulant therapy that affects the final event, namely, when the thrombosis has already occurred. Unfortunately, this schedule is not always effective and fails despite the correct risk stratification and an adequate adjusted dose. From 2013 to 2020 we observed 217 women with antiphospholipid antibodies and obstetric morbidities who were treated with conventional treatment protocol (aspirin low doses ± LMWH). Among them 150 (69.1%) successfully completed pregnancy with delivery and live birth on the background of LMWH and aspirin therapy and in 67 (30.9%) women despite a traditional therapy regimen, obstetric complications were noted. Later, 56 of these 67 women became pregnant again and were offered traditional therapy plus hydroxychloroquine. Fifteen women refused HCQ treatment due to possible potential side effects. The final cohort consisted of 41 women with positive antiphospholipid antibodies and obstetric and thrombotic complications who received LMWH, aspirin low doses and HCQ at a dose of 200-400mg per day from the beginning of pregnancy. Forty-one aPL women treated with HCQ after failed previous anticoagulant therapy had live births in 32 cases (78%). Adding of HCQ to the combination of LMWH and LDA showed good overall obstetric results and increased the number of live births in another 32 women. So, a total of 182 (83.8%) of initial 217 aPL-women ended their pregnancies with live birth after adding the HCQ to the traditional therapy with LMWH and low doses of aspirin. In 20-30% of cases the live birth despite anticoagulation cannot be achieved. Perhaps APS is not just anticoagulation. The study of pathophysiological mechanisms suggests that some patients will benefit from other therapy (in addition to anticoagulant). Therapy that affects the early effects of aPL on target cells (monocytes, endothelial cells, etc.) or before binding to receptors-this therapy will be preferable and potentially less harmful than the officially accepted one to date. From this point of view, HCQ looks promising and can be used as an alternative candidate for women with refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. Adding HCQ should be considered in some selected patients with failed pregnancy after treatment with anticoagulants.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
The current recommended therapy of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a long-term anticoagulant therapy that affects the final event, namely, when the thrombosis has already occurred. Unfortunately, this schedule is not always effective and fails despite the correct risk stratification and an adequate adjusted dose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS UNASSIGNED
From 2013 to 2020 we observed 217 women with antiphospholipid antibodies and obstetric morbidities who were treated with conventional treatment protocol (aspirin low doses ± LMWH). Among them 150 (69.1%) successfully completed pregnancy with delivery and live birth on the background of LMWH and aspirin therapy and in 67 (30.9%) women despite a traditional therapy regimen, obstetric complications were noted. Later, 56 of these 67 women became pregnant again and were offered traditional therapy plus hydroxychloroquine. Fifteen women refused HCQ treatment due to possible potential side effects. The final cohort consisted of 41 women with positive antiphospholipid antibodies and obstetric and thrombotic complications who received LMWH, aspirin low doses and HCQ at a dose of 200-400mg per day from the beginning of pregnancy.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Forty-one aPL women treated with HCQ after failed previous anticoagulant therapy had live births in 32 cases (78%). Adding of HCQ to the combination of LMWH and LDA showed good overall obstetric results and increased the number of live births in another 32 women. So, a total of 182 (83.8%) of initial 217 aPL-women ended their pregnancies with live birth after adding the HCQ to the traditional therapy with LMWH and low doses of aspirin.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
In 20-30% of cases the live birth despite anticoagulation cannot be achieved. Perhaps APS is not just anticoagulation. The study of pathophysiological mechanisms suggests that some patients will benefit from other therapy (in addition to anticoagulant). Therapy that affects the early effects of aPL on target cells (monocytes, endothelial cells, etc.) or before binding to receptors-this therapy will be preferable and potentially less harmful than the officially accepted one to date. From this point of view, HCQ looks promising and can be used as an alternative candidate for women with refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. Adding HCQ should be considered in some selected patients with failed pregnancy after treatment with anticoagulants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34044735
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1908992
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hydroxychloroquine 4QWG6N8QKH
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight 0
Antibodies, Antiphospholipid 0
Aspirin R16CO5Y76E
Anticoagulants 0

Types de publication

Observational Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6157-6164

Auteurs

Jamilya Khizroeva (J)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Victoria Bitsadze (V)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Angela Tincani (A)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Unit of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Alexander Makatsariya (A)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Madina Arslanbekova (M)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Nigar Babaeva (N)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Valentina Tsibizova (V)

Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Saint Petersburg, Health Ministry of Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Andrei Shkoda (A)

Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia.

Natalya Makatsariya (N)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Maria Tretyakova (M)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Antonina Solopova (A)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Zumrad Gadaeva (Z)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Alexander Vorobev (A)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Inessa Khamani (I)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Zamilya Aslanova (Z)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Inga Nakaidze (I)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Alexander Mischenko (A)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Kristina Grigoreva (K)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Nart Kunesko (N)

Moscow's Department of Health, Center for family planning and reproduction (CPSIR), Moscow, Russia.

Elena Egorova (E)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Tamara Mashkova (T)

The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH