Induction Chemotherapy Followed by either Chemoradiotherapy or Bioradiotherapy in Laryngeal Cancer.
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Carboplatin
/ administration & dosage
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ drug therapy
Cetuximab
/ administration & dosage
Chemoradiotherapy
/ mortality
Cisplatin
/ administration & dosage
Docetaxel
/ administration & dosage
Female
Fluorouracil
/ administration & dosage
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Induction Chemotherapy
/ mortality
Laryngeal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Chemotherapy
cetuximab
laryngeal cancer
radiotherapy
Journal
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
ISSN: 2476-762X
Titre abrégé: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
Pays: Thailand
ID NLM: 101130625
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2021
01 May 2021
Historique:
received:
27
10
2019
entrez:
28
5
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In loco regionally advanced head and neck cancer, the superiority of concomitant cetuximab with radiation over radiation alone has been proven previously. But comparison between chemo radiation and bioradiation has not been well studied. Between October 2013 and August 2017, 38 patients with locoregionally advanced laryngeal cancer and more than 50% response to 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy (docetaxel and cisplatin: both with a dose of 75 mg/m2 on the first day and 5-flurouracil: 750 mg/m2 during days 1to 3; repeated every 21 days) were selected to receive either carboplatin (18 patients, AUC 1.5 , weekly) or cetuximab (20 patients, with loading dose of 400 mg/m2 and weekly dose of 250 mg/m2) with radiation. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression free survival and overall survival rates. The log-rank test was used to compare overall survival between treatment groups. The median follow up time was 36 months. The 2-year organ preservation rate of 78.9% was achieved. The 3- year progression-free survival rates of 65.2%, 72.7% and 58.2% were observed for all patients, carboplatin group and cetuximab group, respectively (p=0.4). The 3-year estimates of overall survival were 67.8%, 69.2 %, and 66.3 % for all patients, carboplatin group and cetuximab group, respectively (p=0.47). Concomitant carboplatin was discontinued in 3 patients due to toxicity Conclusion: Concomitant cetuximab is a reasonable alternative to concomitant chemotherapy. But the difference in treatment outcome between bioradiation and chemoradiation remains to be defined.<br />.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34048195
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.5.1633
pmc: PMC8408382
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
Carboplatin
BG3F62OND5
Cetuximab
PQX0D8J21J
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1633-1637Références
Oral Oncol. 2015 Jul;51(7):704-8
pubmed: 25936651
Oncology. 2013;85(5):290-6
pubmed: 24217231
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4133-6
pubmed: 23098530
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Feb 1;94(2):289-96
pubmed: 26675064
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 1;31(7):853-9
pubmed: 23341517
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;34(5):427-35
pubmed: 26644536
Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 Sep;190(9):823-31
pubmed: 24638267
Med Oncol. 2012 Dec;29(4):2481-91
pubmed: 22252310
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Apr 04;9:1927-43
pubmed: 27110122
Oral Oncol. 2014 Oct;50(10):947-55
pubmed: 25132089
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2008 Oct;6(10):742-50
pubmed: 18997665
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;39(1):27-31
pubmed: 24401670
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):915-22
pubmed: 20947269
Head Neck. 2015 Mar;37(3):386-92
pubmed: 24431011
Ann Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(10):2036-2041
pubmed: 25009013
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):21-8
pubmed: 19897418
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):8-14
pubmed: 19917840
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 20;28(36):5294-300
pubmed: 21079141
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;6(2):106-10
pubmed: 20565422
Head Neck. 2010 Oct;32(10):1412-21
pubmed: 20848399