Camidanlumab tesirine in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma: a phase 1, open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study.
Administration, Intravenous
Adult
Aged
Drug Administration Schedule
Exanthema
/ etiology
Female
Fever
/ etiology
Hodgkin Disease
/ drug therapy
Humans
Immunoconjugates
/ adverse effects
Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit
/ immunology
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lymphoma
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Recurrence
Severity of Illness Index
Treatment Outcome
Journal
The Lancet. Haematology
ISSN: 2352-3026
Titre abrégé: Lancet Haematol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101643584
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
revised:
17
03
2021
accepted:
18
03
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
5
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Novel approaches are required to improve outcomes in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We aimed to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine, an anti-CD25 antibody-drug conjugate, in this patient population. This was a phase 1, dose-escalation (part 1), dose-expansion (part 2), multicentre trial done in 12 hospital sites (seven in the USA and five in the UK). Adults (≥18 years old) with pathologically confirmed relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, who had no therapies available to them with established clinical benefit for their disease stage were enrolled. Camidanlumab tesirine was administered intravenously (3-150 μg/kg) once every 3 weeks. Primary objectives were to assess dose-limiting toxicity, determine maximum tolerated dose and recommended expansion dose(s), and assess safety of camidanlumab tesirine. Safety was assessed in all treated patients; antitumour activity was assessed in patients with one or more valid baseline and post-baseline disease assessment and in those who had disease progression or died after first study-drug dose. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02432235. Between Oct 5, 2015, and Jun 30, 2019, 133 patients were enrolled (77 [58%] had classical Hodgkin lymphoma and 56 (42%) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma). Median follow-up was 9·2 months (IQR 4·2-14·3). Eight dose-limiting toxicities were reported in five (6%) of 86 patients who were evaluable; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended doses for expansion were 30 μg/kg and 45 μg/kg for patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma and 80 μg/kg for patients with T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. No recommended doses for expansion were defined for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events (reported by ≥10% of the 133 patients) included increased γ-glutamyltransferase (20 [15%] patients), maculopapular rash (16 [12%]), and anaemia (15 [11%]); 74 (56%) patients had serious treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly pyrexia (16 [12%]). One (1%) fatal treatment-emergent adverse event and two (2%) deaths outside the reporting period were considered at least possibly study-drug related. Antitumoural activity was seen in classical Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas; notably in all patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma, the overall response was 71% (95% CI 60-81). These results warrant evaluation of camidanlumab tesirine as a potential treatment option for relapsed or refractory lymphoma, particularly in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. ADC Therapeutics.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Novel approaches are required to improve outcomes in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We aimed to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine, an anti-CD25 antibody-drug conjugate, in this patient population.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a phase 1, dose-escalation (part 1), dose-expansion (part 2), multicentre trial done in 12 hospital sites (seven in the USA and five in the UK). Adults (≥18 years old) with pathologically confirmed relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, who had no therapies available to them with established clinical benefit for their disease stage were enrolled. Camidanlumab tesirine was administered intravenously (3-150 μg/kg) once every 3 weeks. Primary objectives were to assess dose-limiting toxicity, determine maximum tolerated dose and recommended expansion dose(s), and assess safety of camidanlumab tesirine. Safety was assessed in all treated patients; antitumour activity was assessed in patients with one or more valid baseline and post-baseline disease assessment and in those who had disease progression or died after first study-drug dose. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02432235.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Between Oct 5, 2015, and Jun 30, 2019, 133 patients were enrolled (77 [58%] had classical Hodgkin lymphoma and 56 (42%) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma). Median follow-up was 9·2 months (IQR 4·2-14·3). Eight dose-limiting toxicities were reported in five (6%) of 86 patients who were evaluable; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended doses for expansion were 30 μg/kg and 45 μg/kg for patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma and 80 μg/kg for patients with T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. No recommended doses for expansion were defined for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events (reported by ≥10% of the 133 patients) included increased γ-glutamyltransferase (20 [15%] patients), maculopapular rash (16 [12%]), and anaemia (15 [11%]); 74 (56%) patients had serious treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly pyrexia (16 [12%]). One (1%) fatal treatment-emergent adverse event and two (2%) deaths outside the reporting period were considered at least possibly study-drug related. Antitumoural activity was seen in classical Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas; notably in all patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma, the overall response was 71% (95% CI 60-81).
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
These results warrant evaluation of camidanlumab tesirine as a potential treatment option for relapsed or refractory lymphoma, particularly in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
ADC Therapeutics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34048682
pii: S2352-3026(21)00103-4
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00103-4
pmc: PMC9241579
mid: NIHMS1793873
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
IL2RA protein, human
0
Immunoconjugates
0
Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02432235']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e433-e445Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA151899
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests MH reports grants from Takeda, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma; and personal fees from Janssen, Incyte Corporation, ADC Therapeutics, Celgene Corporation, Pharmacyclics, Omeros, AbGenomics, Verastem, TeneoBio, Sanofi Genzyme, BeiGene, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. GPC reports personal fees from ADC Therapeutics, during the study; personal fees from Roche, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Celleron, BeiGene, Gilead, Novartis, Celgene, and Amgen, outside the submitted work. PFC reports grants from ADC Therapeutics, during the the study; grants from Genentech, outside the submitted work; and personal fees from ADC Therapeutics, Kite Therapeutics, Amgen, Bayer, Verastem, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, and Celgene, outside the submitted work. FS reports personal fees from Imbrium Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. AS reports personal fees from ADC Therapeutics, during the study. AD reports grants from ADC Therapeutics; grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche/Genentech, Celgene; grants and personal fees from Gilead/Kite, Accerta Pharma/AstraZeneca, Karyopharma; and personal fees from Janssen, MorphoSys, and Takeda, during the conduct of the study. JR reports personal fees from Takeda, ADC Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Kite Pharma, Seattle Genetics; and reports his spouse holds stocks in AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and ADC Therapeutics, outside of the submitted work. TM reports personal fees and non-financial support from Amgen; non-financial support from Jazz, Pfizer, Bayer, Kyowa Kirin, and Celgene; personal fees and non-financial support from Gilead/Kite; and personal fees from Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Atara, Takeda, Janssen, Roche, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. JMZ reports personal fees from Seattle Genetics, Kyowa Kirin, and Verastem, outside the submitted work. PF reports personal fees from ADC Therapeutics, Takeda, Roche, and Merck, outside the submitted work. KH reports personal fees from ADC Therapeutics, during the study. HGC reports personal fees from, employment with, and stocks in ADC Therapeutics, during the study. ShH reports personal fees from ADC Therapeutics, during the study. JB reports personal fees from, employment with, and stocks in ADC Therapeutics, during the study. JF reports personal fees from ADC Therapeutics, during the study. JW reports personal fees from, employment with, and stocks in ADC Therapeutics, during the study. StH reports grants and personal fees from ADC Therapeutics, Celgene, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Seattle Genetics, Millennium/Takeda, Verastem and Secura Bio, Aileron, Forty Seven, Trillium Therapeutics, and Affimed; personal fees from C4 Therapeutics, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Myeloid Therapeutics, Vividion Therapeutics, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Acrotech, Astex, BeiGene, Miragen, Merck, Innate Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mundipharma, and ONO Pharma; and grants from Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work. AK declares no competing interests.
Références
Leuk Res. 2020 Aug;95:106385
pubmed: 32521310
Blood. 2021 May 13;137(19):2634-2645
pubmed: 33211842
Am J Hematol. 2016 Jun;91(4):434-42
pubmed: 27001163
Cancer Res. 2012 May 1;72(9):2162-71
pubmed: 22549946
Lancet. 2017 Jul 15;390(10091):298-310
pubmed: 28153383
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2598-607
pubmed: 21576639
Expert Rev Hematol. 2017 Mar;10(3):239-249
pubmed: 28133975
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Sep;8(2):
pubmed: 32912922
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):47-70
pubmed: 31815293
Leuk Lymphoma. 2013 Jan;54(1):69-75
pubmed: 22738414
Blood. 2017 Oct 19;130(16):1800-1808
pubmed: 28774879
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv19-iv29
pubmed: 29796651
J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 10;36(14):1428-1439
pubmed: 29584546
J R Soc Med. 1994 Sep;87(9):526-30
pubmed: 7932460
Blood. 2018 Jan 25;131(4):387-396
pubmed: 29196412
Invest New Drugs. 2019 Apr;37(2):297-306
pubmed: 30132271
Cancer. 1989 Jun 1;63(11):2083-7
pubmed: 2566368
Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1853-62
pubmed: 25796459
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68
pubmed: 25113753
Br J Haematol. 2017 Oct;179(1):20-35
pubmed: 28556984
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 20;112(42):13045-50
pubmed: 26438866
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 20;30(18):2183-9
pubmed: 22454421
Mol Cancer Ther. 2016 Nov;15(11):2709-2721
pubmed: 27535974
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;34(31):3733-3739
pubmed: 27354476
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;17(11):3794-802
pubmed: 21346148