Prediction of right heart failure after left ventricular assist implantation: external validation of the EUROMACS right-sided heart failure risk score.
Mechanical circulatory support
Right ventricular failure
Risk prediction
Score
Journal
European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care
ISSN: 2048-8734
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101591369
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2021
01 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
10
01
2021
revised:
21
03
2021
pubmed:
30
5
2021
medline:
25
11
2021
entrez:
29
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prediction of right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant remains a challenge. The EUROMACS right-sided heart failure (EUROMACS-RHF) risk score was proposed as a prediction tool for post-LVAD RHF but lacks from large external validation. The aim of our study was to externally validate the score. From January 2007 to December 2017, 878 continuous-flow LVADs were implanted at three tertiary centres. We calculated the EUROMACS-RHF score in 662 patients with complete data. We evaluated its predictive performance for early RHF defined as either (i) need for short- or long-term right-sided circulatory support, (ii) continuous inotropic support for ≥14 days, or (iii) nitric oxide for ≥48 h post-operatively. Right heart failure occurred in 211 patients (32%). When compared with non-RHF patients, pre-operatively they had higher creatinine, bilirubin, right atrial pressure, and lower INTERMACS class (P < 0.05); length of stay and in-hospital mortality were higher. Area under the ROC curve for RHF prediction of the EUROMACS-RHF score was 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.68]. Reclassification of patients with RHF was significantly better when applying the EUROMACS-RHF risk score on top of previous published scores. Patients in the high-risk category had significantly higher in-hospital and 2-year mortality [hazard ratio: 1.64 (95% CI 1.16-2.32) P = 0.005]. In an external cohort, the EUROMACS-RHF had limited discrimination predicting RHF. The clinical utility of this score remains to be determined.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34050652
pii: 6288109
doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab029
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
723-732Subventions
Organisme : Sociedad Española de Cardiología. S.S. received funding from NIH
ID : R01MD011307
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.