Comparison of shunt types in the neonatal Norwood procedure for single ventricle.

The ideal shunt for pulmonary blood flow, modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBTS) or right ventricular-pulmonary artery conduit (RVPAC) is yet to be determined. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes after the Norwood procedure according to the type of shunt. A total of 322 neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and related anomalies who underwent the Norwood procedure at our institution between 2001 and 2019 were divided into MBTS and RVPAC groups and the outcomes after the Norwood procedure were compared between the groups with respect to mortality after each staged procedure. We identified 322 consequent patients who underwent neonatal Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (271 patients, 84.2%) and its variant (51 patients, 15.8%). RVPAC was performed in 163 (50.6%) patients and MBTS was performed in 159 (49.4%). There were no differences in the rate of early death (11.0% vs 12.6%, P = 0.69) or late death (7.4% vs 6.9%, P = 0.87) between the 2 groups after the Norwood procedure, and no significant difference in the number of patients who reached bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (77.9% vs 76.1%, P = 0.69), and there was no difference in mortality after bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (12.3% vs 7.5%, P = 0.15) or Fontan completion rate (54.0% vs 52.2%, P = 0.42) between the 2 groups. Survival at 0.5, 1, 3 and 6 years after the Norwood procedure was 81.0%, 73.8%, 67.9% and 67.0% in patients with RVPAC and 77.1%, 73.3%, 69.1% and 67.9% in patients with MBTS. There was no significant difference in the survival between the 2 groups during the median follow-up of 2.6 (interquartile ranges: 0.3-8.4, maximal 18.8) years (P = 0.97). In neonates undergoing the Norwood procedure, our available data of maximal 18.8 years follow-up showed no significant difference in early mortality, inter-stage attritions, or overall survival, between MBTS and RVPAC.

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.