Performance of plasma kisspeptin as a biomarker for miscarriage improves with gestational age during the first trimester.
Abortion, Spontaneous
/ blood
Biomarkers
/ blood
Case-Control Studies
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human
/ blood
Down-Regulation
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Kisspeptins
/ blood
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
/ blood
Prospective Studies
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Kisspeptin
miscarriage
pregnancy
Journal
Fertility and sterility
ISSN: 1556-5653
Titre abrégé: Fertil Steril
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372772
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
25
10
2020
revised:
17
04
2021
accepted:
20
04
2021
pubmed:
1
6
2021
medline:
6
10
2021
entrez:
31
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the performance of kisspeptin and beta human chorionic gonadotropin (βhCG), both alone and in combination, as biomarkers for miscarriage throughout the first trimester. Prospective, nested case-control study. Tertiary Centre, Queen Charlotte Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Adult women who had miscarriages (n = 95, 173 samples) and women with healthy pregnancies (n = 265, 557 samples). The participants underwent serial ultrasound scans and blood sampling for measurement of plasma kisspeptin and βhCG levels during the first trimester. The ability of plasma kisspeptin and βhCG levels to distinguish pregnancies complicated by miscarriage from healthy pregnancies unaffected by miscarriage. Gestation-adjusted levels of circulating kisspeptin and βhCG were lower in samples from women with miscarriages than in women with healthy pregnancies by 79% and 70%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for identifying miscarriage during the first trimester was 0.874 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.844-0.904) for kisspeptin, 0.859 (95% CI 0.820-0.899) for βhCG, and 0.916 (95% CI 0.886-0.946) for the sum of the two markers. The performance of kisspeptin in identifying miscarriage improved with increasing length of gestation, whereas that of βhCG worsened. A decision matrix incorporating kisspeptin, βhCG, and gestational age had 83% to 87% accuracy for the prediction of miscarriage. Plasma kisspeptin is a promising biomarker for miscarriage and provides additional value to βhCG alone, especially during later gestational weeks of the first trimester.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34053677
pii: S0015-0282(21)00305-8
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.031
pmc: PMC8445632
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human
0
Kisspeptins
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
809-819Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T006242/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-2014-05-001
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R000484/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : CS-2018-18-ST2-002
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Nov;187(5):1416-23
pubmed: 12439541
Endocrinology. 2014 Aug;155(8):3065-78
pubmed: 24877624
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 27;9:115
pubmed: 29662466
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99680
pubmed: 24923321
BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):e107-e113
pubmed: 30402915
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Dec 1;103(12):4482-4490
pubmed: 30124894
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jan;109(1):67
pubmed: 29129377
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Dec;90(12):6609-15
pubmed: 16174713
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1 Suppl):S1-S46
pubmed: 26972897
Hum Reprod. 2005 Aug;20(8):2330-3
pubmed: 15860494
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Aug;23(4):463-77
pubmed: 19502113
Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Nov-Dec;12(6):747-55
pubmed: 16682385
Pathol Res Pract. 2014 Jan;210(1):47-54
pubmed: 24225150
Placenta. 2015 Jan;36(1):52-8
pubmed: 25468546
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1159-61
pubmed: 22992082
BJOG. 2008 Sep;115(10):1273-8
pubmed: 18715413
J Biol Chem. 2001 Sep 14;276(37):34631-6
pubmed: 11457843
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012 Jun;94(6):417-23
pubmed: 22511535
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Dec;99(12):E2652-60
pubmed: 25127195
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006 Jul 25;254-255:70-7
pubmed: 16757106
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun 1;177(11):1271-8
pubmed: 23558353
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Nov;87(11):5336-9
pubmed: 12414911
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4):367.e1-367.e22
pubmed: 31953115
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66(4):257-67
pubmed: 18679035
PLoS One. 2013 May 16;8(5):e63574
pubmed: 23696833
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):480.e1-480.e17
pubmed: 30707968
J Endocrinol. 2012 Jul;214(1):79-85
pubmed: 22526494
Placenta. 2012 May;33(5):408-15
pubmed: 22349353
J Cell Sci. 2004 Mar 15;117(Pt 8):1319-28
pubmed: 15020672
BMJ. 2015 Sep 23;351:h4579
pubmed: 26400869
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004 Sep;7(3):169-74
pubmed: 15590570
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Feb;88(2):914-9
pubmed: 12574233
Clin Chem. 2008 Mar;54(3):615-7
pubmed: 18310154
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2017;152(2):81-89
pubmed: 28662500
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012 Feb;67(2):132-9
pubmed: 21996032
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Jun;25(3):301-11
pubmed: 21109492
BMJ. 2013 Jun 19;346:f3676
pubmed: 23783355
Endocrinology. 2010 Dec;151(12):5927-34
pubmed: 20926586
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;17(6):510-2
pubmed: 11422973
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;38(5):497-502
pubmed: 21997898
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 May;65(5):613-20
pubmed: 3885105
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;49(4):1259-1276
pubmed: 30205368
Nature. 2001 May 31;411(6837):613-7
pubmed: 11385580
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jan;109(1):137-141.e2
pubmed: 29307393
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 9;380(19):1815-1824
pubmed: 31067371
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Nov;291(5):E878-84
pubmed: 16757546
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jul 8;34(7):1291-1301
pubmed: 31188433
Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):121-41
pubmed: 17068222
J Clin Ultrasound. 1991 May;19(4):221-3
pubmed: 1646226
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Dec 4;88(23):1731-7
pubmed: 8944003
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Mar;38(3):465-471
pubmed: 30718048
N Engl J Med. 1988 Jul 28;319(4):189-94
pubmed: 3393170
Hum Reprod. 2009 Aug;24(8):1811-7
pubmed: 19363041